
dakchuh
Master
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2021
- Posts
- 1,702
- Reputation
- 2,943
what criteria do they use and how do you not get fucked by them? because its pretty clear that many before and afters seem pretty unimpressive and that many patients look like they could've had bigger movements.
from what i understand from my research there are two main components to a bimax and its the occlusal plane angle (CCW in my case) and advancement. optimal occlusal plane angle is around 3-7 degrees? and the lower the angle the better to maximize mandible length for aesthetics. in that case, why don't surgeons reduce the angle as much as possible? stability concerns especially with posterior downgraft? secondly the advancement. what landmarks do you use to determine the mm of advancement for an aesthetical outcome?
@RealSurgerymax @SixCRY
from what i understand from my research there are two main components to a bimax and its the occlusal plane angle (CCW in my case) and advancement. optimal occlusal plane angle is around 3-7 degrees? and the lower the angle the better to maximize mandible length for aesthetics. in that case, why don't surgeons reduce the angle as much as possible? stability concerns especially with posterior downgraft? secondly the advancement. what landmarks do you use to determine the mm of advancement for an aesthetical outcome?
@RealSurgerymax @SixCRY