How far would YOU go to save the planet? Mothers reveal what they'd do if they 'ruled the world' - from a one child policy to a BAN on meat and an ai

[dat feel]

How far would YOU go to save the planet? Mothers reveal what they'd do if they 'ruled the world' - from a one child policy to a BAN on meat and an air miles cap - but some claim it's an 'impractical communist nightmare' ​

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

Actually was gonna make fun of them, but I have a certain level of respect for mothers

They're out there nurturing the future of this world (be it incel or a high IQ pretty boy)

 

[spyspy]

that's why women shouldn't rule, emotional creatures that would just speed up the world's demise

 

[Magical Apple]

How far would YOU go to save the planet? Mothers reveal what they'd do if they 'ruled the world' - from a one child policy to a BAN on meat and an air miles cap - but some claim it's an 'impractical communist nightmare' ​

My strategy would be to increase available energy and fight the problems of climate change through radical adaptation. Once humanity achieves fusion power we will literally have so much energy we will be able to suck co2 out of the air and turn it into rubber or fuel. People are too short sited about climate change. With more advanced technology it will be easy to deal with. I believe the benefits of heavy industry massively outweigh the costs of a changing environment. These people are absolute idiots.



- I would start with large scale production of thorium nuclear power plants. Build as many nuclear power plants as possible. You can literally never have "too much" energy.
- Invest very heavily into nuclear fusion research.
- Invest in space based power beaming.
- Work on reducing fossil fuel scarcity with offshore drilling.
- fight rising sea levels by building massive dykes.
- do everything possible to increase long term food production.
- Begin a forrest planting campaign to fight desertification.

 

[Magical Apple]

Actually was gonna make fun of them, but I have a certain level of respect for mothers

They're out there nurturing the future of this world (be it incel or a high IQ pretty boy)

Yea these fucktards are nurturing the next generation of fucktards whose incompetence will lead to WW3.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Here is my plan

1. reduce human population to at most 1 billion people
2. reduce economic output to early 1900s European and American levels.

 

[Magical Apple]

Here is my plan

1. reduce human population to at most 1 billion people
2. reduce economic output to early 1900s European and American levels.

Absolutely horrible plan. Why tf would you want to go back to one of the most violent and chaotic eras in human history?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Absolutely horrible plan.

why? Population is simply too high, we're forced to degrade our farmable land. Kill 7 billion people, simply reduce the demand for resources. Anything else is faggot reddit cope.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Absolutely horrible plan. Why tf would you want to go back to one of the most violent and chaotic eras in human history?

I said return the economic productivity to that level, not return exactly to what it was like. read my post again.

 

[Deleted member 20891]

How far would YOU go to save the planet? Mothers reveal what they'd do if they 'ruled the world' - from a one child policy to a BAN on meat and an air miles cap - but some claim it's an 'impractical communist nightmare' ​

Here is my plan:
- Kick out the WEF and Bilderberg from our parliaments
- Abolish the climate agreement
- Don't work with Agenda 2030
- Reduce faggots - they create a lot of CO2
- End all manufacturing of modern technology
- End all mask manufacturing
- End all MRNA genetherapy production

 

[Magical Apple]

why? Population is simply too high, we're forced to degrade our farmable land. Kill 7 billion people.

Our population is not too high. In the developed world, it is getting too low. What we need to do is increase our productivity to eliminate scarcity.

 

[Magical Apple]

I said return the economic productivity to that level, not return exactly to what it was like. read my post again.

Return to an economic productivity where mass starvation was common? Tf

 

[Magical Apple]

Here is my plan:
- Kick out the WEF and Bilderberg from our parliaments
- Abolish the climate agreement
- Don't work with Agenda 2030
- Reduce faggots - they create a lot of CO2
- End all manufacturing of modern technology
- End all mask manufacturing
- End all MRNA genetherapy production

so you want to destroy humanity?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Our population is not too high. In the developed world, it is getting too low. What we need to do is increase our productivity to eliminate scarcity.

Most of these developed nations require huge amounts of fertilizer, it's extremely wasteful. Every country should have their population reduced to the point that they can sustain themselves without artificially increasing yields.

post scarcity is cope. We have a hard limit with how efficient we can use resources sustainably and we are way over the limit of sustainability.

Obliterate 6/7th of all human life.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Return to an economic productivity where mass starvation was common? Tf

not in Europe and America. Again you don't read my fucking posts. I never said 1900s as a whole.

 

[Deleted member 20891]

so you want to destroy humanity?

No, i want to save society from this bs as we have damaged society and the world enough now. Climate bullcrp will only make things more expensive and only the jewish globalists profit from it. Imo we should return to a village-based society, maybe even a primitive society like in 3000BC however this is very unrealistic as we damaged the world too much.

Also, i made a thread on how i want to rebuild society, it's on my profile you can check it out

 

[Magical Apple]

Most of these developed nations require huge amounts of fertilizer, it's extremely wasteful. Every country should have their population reduced to the point that they can sustain themselves without artificially increasing yields.

post scarcity is cope. We have a hard limit with how efficient we can use resources sustainably and we are way over the limit of sustainability.

Obliterate 6/7th of all human life.

We are currently limited by our energy. With enough energy we could recycle almost anything with brute force and we are not using even a fraction of the energy we theoretically could. Fission, fusion and space based solar could easily supply enough power to run our current civilization 10 times over at near post scarcity levels. We need to think in terms of centuries, not decades.

 

[Magical Apple]

not in Europe and America. Again you don't read my fucking posts. I never said 1900s as a whole.

That wouldn't work as intended. What would happen is you would have economic and societal collapse. Very bad idea.

 

[Magical Apple]

No, i want to save society from this bs as we have damaged society and the world enough now. Climate bullcrp will only make things more expensive and only the jewish globalists profit from it. Imo we should return to a village-based society, maybe even a primitive society like in 3000BC however this is very unrealistic as we damaged the world too much.

Also, i made a thread on how i want to rebuild society, it's on my profile you can check it out

luddite lunacy

 

[Deleted member 17791]

We are currently limited by our energy. With enough energy we could recycle almost anything with brute force and we are not using even a fraction of the energy we theoretically could. Fission, fusion and space based solar could easily supply enough power to run our current civilization 10 times over at near post scarcity levels. We need to think in terms of centuries, not decades.

Just rely on impractical and extremely inefficient use of energy theory.

I prefer not to hope for infinite growth. This progressive idea of endless growth of productivity is the very reason the earth's ecosystem is collapsing.

Just create solar panels orbiting the sun and beam the energy down to earth bro!

 

[Deleted member 17791]

That wouldn't work as intended. What would happen is you would have economic and societal collapse. Very bad idea.

no.

 

[Deleted member 20891]

luddite lunacy

Cope retard go suck Klaus Schwabs jewish cock faggot

 

[Dog]

you shall see hell clear in the sky

 

[Magical Apple]

Just rely on impractical and extremely inefficient use of energy theory.

I prefer not to hope for infinite growth. This progressive idea of endless growth of proclivity is the very reason the earth's ecosystem is collapsing.

Just create solar panels orbiting the sun and beam the energy down to earth bro!

Compared to the amount of energy that is regularly used up in the cosmos our civilization is completely insignificant. Managing a planet is a very easy task for a sophisticated civiliation. There is so much energy out there just waiting to be used.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Compared to the amount of energy that is regularly used up in the cosmos our civilization is completely insignificant. Managing a planet is a very easy task for a sophisticated civiliation. There is so much energy out there just waiting to be used.

That energy can't be used efficiently. You'll use more energy setting up mining stations on asteroids then you'll be able to extract. It's a fantasy.

 

[Magical Apple]

That energy can't be used efficiently. You'll use more energy setting up mining stations on asteroids then you'll be able to extract. It's a fantasy.

It doesnt matter if you use it efficiently when you have so much.

 

[ConspiracyTheory]