Z
Zygomaticangle
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2025
- Posts
- 21
- Reputation
- 3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
JFL , there’s literally 0 doctors that would do lefort 3 for aesthetics purposesHey man,
From the front-facing photo alone, I can already tell that your mandible seems underdeveloped and your maxilla appears quite narrow. There’s definitely potential for improvement.
If you’re aiming for a solid transformation, BiMax (LeFort I + BSSO) could work well for you.
But if you’re chasing the most dramatic, high-impact result, you might want to look into LeFort III — it’s a more advanced surgery that shifts the entire midface structure forward and can create a much stronger, more masculine look.
If you don’t mind, could you upload a side profile photo? That would help a lot in evaluating your facial projection and overall harmony.
full facial implants, trimax
wtf is this formatHey man
copeWait until 21 before you get any surgeries.
burakJFL , there’s literally 0 doctors that would do lefort 3 for aesthetics purposes
I recommended BiMax in this case not just randomly — but because his midface clearly lacks depth and projection. The maxilla appears recessed, and there’s very little forward support under the eyes. That kind of structural issue doesn’t get fixed by BSSO alone.People on this site dont even see the side and recommend bimax, good old niggers
Holy chatgpt go kysI recommended BiMax in this case not just randomly — but because his midface clearly lacks depth and projection. The maxilla appears recessed, and there’s very little forward support under the eyes. That kind of structural issue doesn’t get fixed by BSSO alone.
BiMax brings the midface forward, supports the infraorbital area, and can even improve eye depth — sometimes giving more “hunter eyes” if done right.
And no offense, bro, but if you can’t spot obvious midface deficiencies even from a frontal photo, that’s not a “photo angle” problem — that’s just your eye not being trained.
Everyone loves to cry “show profile first” like it’s some holy rule — but truth is, some of us can read bone structure in 2D just fine. If you can’t, maybe don’t talk down to people who can.
KkHoly chatgpt go kys
unluckily a simple lf1/bsso wont do shit to his midfaceI recommended BiMax in this case not just randomly — but because his midface clearly lacks depth and projection. The maxilla appears recessed, and there’s very little forward support under the eyes. That kind of structural issue doesn’t get fixed by BSSO alone.
BiMax brings the midface forward, supports the infraorbital area, and can even improve eye depth — sometimes giving more “hunter eyes” if done right.
And no offense, bro, but if you can’t spot obvious midface deficiencies even from a frontal photo, that’s not a “photo angle” problem — that’s just your eye not being trained.
Everyone loves to cry “show profile first” like it’s some holy rule — but truth is, some of us can read bone structure in 2D just fine. If you can’t, maybe don’t talk down to people who can.
You throw a tantrum about side profiles like it’s the holy grail of diagnostics, meanwhile missing textbook midface recession staring you dead in the face.unluckily a simple lf1/bsso wont do shit to his midfacemy guy didnt even see his side profile but suggested orthognatic surgery, which would still be the wrong procedure for a flat/recessed midface. u might be in my top 3 most retarded users on this forum
why do you think infra,paranasal,... implants exist and people combine them with bimax to get rid of that type of recession. just think about itYou throw a tantrum about side profiles like it’s the holy grail of diagnostics, meanwhile missing textbook midface recession staring you dead in the face.
Paranasal flatness, hollow infraorbital area, negative vector — all obvious from the front if you know what to look for.
And no, BiMax which I mentioned, try reading isn’t some random surgery — it’s literally designed to bring forward a recessed midface. But sure, keep acting like it’s the wrong procedure while showing zero surgical literacy.
If you’re seriously this rattled over someone pointing out basic bone structure, maybe forums aren’t for you. Go back, learn to read a face before barking orthognathic takes
You are talking about leforte 3, leforte 1 cuts is done at the paranasal. So your advice sucks, sure if you said to make the midface and chin vertically longer i would have taken it but you obv dont know jack poop and should ropeI recommended BiMax in this case not just randomly — but because his midface clearly lacks depth and projection. The maxilla appears recessed, and there’s very little forward support under the eyes. That kind of structural issue doesn’t get fixed by BSSO alone.
BiMax brings the midface forward, supports the infraorbital area, and can even improve eye depth — sometimes giving more “hunter eyes” if done right.
And no offense, bro, but if you can’t spot obvious midface deficiencies even from a frontal photo, that’s not a “photo angle” problem — that’s just your eye not being trained.
Everyone loves to cry “show profile first” like it’s some holy rule — but truth is, some of us can read bone structure in 2D just fine. If you can’t, maybe don’t talk down to people who can.
PFL is fucking law.