Wombles
Everything I have/will post on here is a joke
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2024
- Posts
- 1,526
- Reputation
- 5,042
Well well well gentleman which nigga predicted .org members would get arrested months ago? This nigga did.
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
Basically I knew looksmax.org users would have got arrested for stuff they posted online and made a thread a month and a bit ago talking about it
I then made subsequent threads about this topic (see above they are in order). And how soon users would find themselves arrested. Well my prophecy has come to fruition.
looksmax.org
won't link article but all statements were from it
How manletmachine got caught and arrested (i blocked out all names):
Well firstly we all knew he posted incessantly about this Tik tok woman that was his avi and he made comments about "I think about rape and murder 24/7" and also how he wanted to "murder and rape" this tik tok woman. Firstly obviously these are wrong.
these messages were seen as threats and he got a stalker charge.
But how was manletmachine caught?
written in bold and quotes is what an article I can't link states:
"Police were initially alerted last June after the complaint, an active TikTok user, became aware that sexual fantasies about her had allegedly been posted on a men’s self-improvement website." Ok so Niamharina herself made a complaint to police so that's why they tried to investigate.
"the woman provided police with screenshots of a series of messages on the forum allegedly linked to manlet, the court heard". She showed proof he was harassing her so police took notice.
"At that stage the investigation was closed due to issues with identifying any perpetrator."
This is where things get interesting the police couldn't have done anything because they didn't know manletmachines identity but why? Obviously if law enforcement asked moderators his iP because they are concerned. they could have found out way sooner and then Niamharina wouldn't have needed to pretend to get close to him and found out his identity herself.
So there are a few theories here:
one moderators got contacted by law enforcement and gave his entire post history so it would have been easier for them to find messages incriminating him. Two moderators refused to comply and police are going off posts they themselves found and the ones Niamharina showed.
The big question is when First contacted by Niamharina did the police then message .org mods and ask for more details? Or did they not. This is a big deal because if .org moderation is working with law enforcement which does seem likely then local police (especially in europe) can be given users data and be arrested for there "misogynistic threatening messages" they have posted.
Response by mods from my "incoming raid on .org users:
and a response by a clueless .org member:
Let's keep looking at what happened next in the article and interview.
During police questioning manlet allegedly stated “I wished death on her and I said in a song I hope she gets raped.”
He told interviewing officers that he wanted the woman to see the messages to “piss her off”, but insisted it was merely a platform for posting extreme comments which were not serious.
Asked his intention in publishing the photograph, he replied: “I get that it looks like me trying to be a threat, but it was just me and this other guy from Lithuania from the forum.”
Analysing what manlet machine said:
Firstly this nigga, stupid fucking nigga I assume didn't talk to and get a lawyer. He says in the interview "i wished death on her and I said in a song I hope she gets raped.”
This is stupid if given a lawyer she would have advised him to stay silent and give a no comment, but it appears he thought he could talk his way out of it and so incriminate himself further.
He told interviewing officers that he wanted the woman to see the messages to “piss her off”, but insisted it was merely a platform for posting extreme comments which were not serious.
Asked his intention in publishing the photograph, he replied: “I get that it looks like me trying to be a threat, but it was just me and this other guy from Lithuania from the forum.”
so he continues to talk without a lawyer and says he just wanted to "piss her off". Whats wrong with this message is the fact he admits that he wanted to make her annoyed or uncomfortable so his thoughts behind what he posted weren't a joke and were malicious.
Now who is this guy from Lithuania mentioned?
His identity will be easily found if u check manletmachines post history and check who he consistently tags and who consistently reps and replies to his comments about this tik tok woman. Also they most likely had conversations so if a mod checked them they'd probably know also mods know ips so they can check all the Lithuanian ones they have and found out.
Manletmachines lawyer:
Defence counsel (female lawyer) confirmed her client accepted making “totally unacceptable and horrible” comments.
She argued that manlet, who is studying at (a place wont dox where), has an attention deficit disorder and no history of aggression.
Referring to the photo outside the woman’s house, Ms lawyer submitted: “He says it was done in a poor attempt at humour, there was no attempted threat.”
Manlet was refused bail and remanded in custody until May 7.
Firstly it's so fucking ironic the man who's sent thousands of messages hating woman is getting represented by a woman AHAHAHAHA. Anyways, this is maybe bad. Firstly, the woman lawyer could secretly try and get my nigga a longer jail sentence as she simply doesn't like his views. She could do this by presenting a sloppy defence case and thus he'll get fucked more. Hopefully, she could just give him a good defense and defend him well regardless of what he's said and hopefully he won't be charged with anything (very unlikely).
So the defense the lawyer gave was basically it was a joke guys: Ms lawyer submitted: “He says it was done in a poor attempt at humour, there was no attempted threat.” this is a weak fucking defence. other more viable defences could have been.
Now let me give you help as to what manletmachines legal defence could be:
Challenging the Legal Elements of the Offense
- Lack of "Course of Conduct": Argue that the defendant’s actions (e.g., reposting videos and comments) do not meet the threshold of a "course of conduct" (at least two incidents). If posts were isolated or spread over a long period, this could weaken the claim.
- No Intent or Reasonable Perception of Harm: Contest whether the defendant intended to cause distress or whether a reasonable person would foresee the harm. For example, claim the comments were misguided criticism rather than targeted harassment.
2. Evidentiary Challenges
- Disputing Responsibility: Challenge digital evidence linking the defendant to the posts (e.g., IP address inaccuracies, account sharing, or hacking claims).
- Questioning the Victim’s Distress: Scrutinize the evidence of the victim’s distress (e.g., inconsistent testimony, lack of medical/psychological reports).
3. Free Expression Arguments
- Article 10 ECHR (Freedom of Expression): Argue that the posts, while offensive, were lawful expressions of opinion. This is a high bar given the UK’s balancing of free speech against harassment, but context (e.g., public interest in the videos) might be raised.
4. Contextual or Procedural Defenses
- Publicly Available Material: If the videos were already public (e.g., on social media), argue the defendant merely shared existing content without malicious intent.
- Procedural Errors: Highlight improper evidence collection (e.g., breaches of data protection laws) to exclude key evidence.
5. Reasonableness and Legitimate Purpose
- Legitimate Motive: Claim the posts served a lawful purpose (e.g., exposing wrongdoing, satire), though this is speculative unless supported by evidence.
- Reasonable Conduct" Defense: Assert the defendant’s actions were reasonable in context (e.g., responding to provocation, though UK law rarely accepts this for harassment).
6. Mental Health or Mitigating Factors
- Mental State:While not a full defense, evidence of mental health issues might reduce culpability or influence sentencing (e.g., arguing diminished capacity).
7. Jurisdictional or Temporal Issues
- Timing of Incidents: If incidents occurred far apart, argue they do not form a coherent "course of conduct."
Key Considerations:
-Prosecution Burden: The prosecution must prove both the conduct and its impact. Defense strategies often focus on creating reasonable doubt in these areas.
He could use some of these defences like mental health or show she wasn't in fact distressed this is probably how it will go. But it looks bad
What manletmachines fate will be:
Manlet was refused bail and remanded in custody until May 7.
Deputy District (female judge) ruled: “The real concerns relate to the potential for re-offending and interference with the witness.”
It looks bad he was refused bail so the judge thinks he's a threat. If seen this way he'll get many years behind bars as they don't want a threat to safety outside. Also what really fucked this guy over was obviously the rape and murder threats but mainly taking a picture outside her home. When you go out of ur way and take a picture outside her house you are showing that you are capable of going out of your way to cause harm and potentially this could lead to him causing harm to Niamharina.
How other users can avoid arrest:
Firstly don't be like manletmachine don't incessantly post tik toks of women in your local area and make rape or murder comments on them. Don't then visit her house and take a pic. Also as for opsec what you would want to do is not have a apple as the uk government has a backdoor for all apple devices. So don't use apple. even though its against the rules you could (not that I recommend it because it breaks the rules) login with cafe WiFi far away from your actual home and use a encrypted email like proton. So they can't use ur email address to find your address.
The ultimate option to protect yourself (again I don't support this) you could ask someone from a third world country or one with lax laws like Brazil and Iraq to make you an account so there ip and WiFi will be in the websites history then ask them to give u the details for the login to his account and use it how you want. However this website logs every ip you have when u login so you'd have to also use a vpn before u login everytime. This is high effort but probably the best way.
Finally stay safe guys don't post weird messages like rape or murder and never attempt to harass anybody. And manlet machine we wish u the best.
disclaimer:
Mods I'm not doxxing manletmachine by revealing revealing the police statement and I didn't show the article. Also I blocked out all names and places and this is very informative to help others on what not to do
Also mods tell me did u help law enforcement and give a public response to one of our members getting arrested:
@Master
@NumbThePain
@Gargantuan
@highinhibcel
Everything I post, or have posted, on this site are source of parody, satire, humour and for entertainment purposes only. I am not liable for any emotional or physical damage caused by my posts, nor is that my intention. I do not intend to influence any other users' posts, nor do I adhere to politically incorrect or illegal posts on this site. When I post here I'm playing a character one that fits the bill of this forum this isn't the real me this is a purely fictional character. I support each and every attempt from law enforcement to bring anyone breaking the law into custody and jail.
The incoming raid of .org members in europe
Europe is cucked it isn't like America where you have some based orange oldcel who'd protect your rights to shitpost and be racist. There's no freedom of speech there's freedom of expression and "It is important to note that while freedom of expression is a fundamental right, individuals have a...
looksmax.org
Incels.is posts on daily mail news article (W/PROOF HOW I PREDICTED THIS)
See past threads for more context: https://looksmax.org/threads/the-incoming-raid-of-org-members-in-europe.1353998/ https://looksmax.org/threads/incels-is-user-apprehended-by-police-and-how-i-predicted-this-w-prophetic-thread.1368284/ Basically I predicted that europe will crack down more on...
looksmax.org
Incels.is user apprehended by police and how i predicted this (W/PROPHETIC THREAD)
Another day another 24 hours I'm proven right. I made a thread like 11 days ago talking about how europecels are fucked and how you'll get tracked and apprehended in due time: https://looksmax.org/threads/the-incoming-raid-of-org-members-in-europe.1353998/ A lot of you didn't believe me well...
looksmax.org
Uk law enforcement tries to take down s@nctioned suicide also counter terrorism group created for "online violence by men" (W/PROOF HOW I SAW THIS)
See past threads for more context: https://looksmax.org/threads/the-incoming-raid-of-org-members-in-europe.1353998/ https://looksmax.org/threads/incels-is-user-apprehended-by-police-and-how-i-predicted-this-w-prophetic-thread.1368284/...
looksmax.org
Basically I knew looksmax.org users would have got arrested for stuff they posted online and made a thread a month and a bit ago talking about it
I then made subsequent threads about this topic (see above they are in order). And how soon users would find themselves arrested. Well my prophecy has come to fruition.
MANLETMACHINE GOT ARRESTED
Holy shit, get the fuck in here. https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern-ireland/belfast-student-charged-with-stalking-woman-made-rape-and-murder-comments-on-incel-forums-court-told-C7UDWIYZEFCMBB4ZMQRWSVFZZM/ @Volksstaffel @RXnd @loyolaxavvierretard @ey88 @BimaxLaser
looksmax.org
won't link article but all statements were from it
How manletmachine got caught and arrested (i blocked out all names):
Well firstly we all knew he posted incessantly about this Tik tok woman that was his avi and he made comments about "I think about rape and murder 24/7" and also how he wanted to "murder and rape" this tik tok woman. Firstly obviously these are wrong.
these messages were seen as threats and he got a stalker charge.
But how was manletmachine caught?
written in bold and quotes is what an article I can't link states:
"Police were initially alerted last June after the complaint, an active TikTok user, became aware that sexual fantasies about her had allegedly been posted on a men’s self-improvement website." Ok so Niamharina herself made a complaint to police so that's why they tried to investigate.
"the woman provided police with screenshots of a series of messages on the forum allegedly linked to manlet, the court heard". She showed proof he was harassing her so police took notice.
"At that stage the investigation was closed due to issues with identifying any perpetrator."
This is where things get interesting the police couldn't have done anything because they didn't know manletmachines identity but why? Obviously if law enforcement asked moderators his iP because they are concerned. they could have found out way sooner and then Niamharina wouldn't have needed to pretend to get close to him and found out his identity herself.
So there are a few theories here:
one moderators got contacted by law enforcement and gave his entire post history so it would have been easier for them to find messages incriminating him. Two moderators refused to comply and police are going off posts they themselves found and the ones Niamharina showed.
The big question is when First contacted by Niamharina did the police then message .org mods and ask for more details? Or did they not. This is a big deal because if .org moderation is working with law enforcement which does seem likely then local police (especially in europe) can be given users data and be arrested for there "misogynistic threatening messages" they have posted.
Response by mods from my "incoming raid on .org users:
and a response by a clueless .org member:
Let's keep looking at what happened next in the article and interview.
During police questioning manlet allegedly stated “I wished death on her and I said in a song I hope she gets raped.”
He told interviewing officers that he wanted the woman to see the messages to “piss her off”, but insisted it was merely a platform for posting extreme comments which were not serious.
Asked his intention in publishing the photograph, he replied: “I get that it looks like me trying to be a threat, but it was just me and this other guy from Lithuania from the forum.”
Analysing what manlet machine said:
Firstly this nigga, stupid fucking nigga I assume didn't talk to and get a lawyer. He says in the interview "i wished death on her and I said in a song I hope she gets raped.”
This is stupid if given a lawyer she would have advised him to stay silent and give a no comment, but it appears he thought he could talk his way out of it and so incriminate himself further.
He told interviewing officers that he wanted the woman to see the messages to “piss her off”, but insisted it was merely a platform for posting extreme comments which were not serious.
Asked his intention in publishing the photograph, he replied: “I get that it looks like me trying to be a threat, but it was just me and this other guy from Lithuania from the forum.”
so he continues to talk without a lawyer and says he just wanted to "piss her off". Whats wrong with this message is the fact he admits that he wanted to make her annoyed or uncomfortable so his thoughts behind what he posted weren't a joke and were malicious.
Now who is this guy from Lithuania mentioned?
His identity will be easily found if u check manletmachines post history and check who he consistently tags and who consistently reps and replies to his comments about this tik tok woman. Also they most likely had conversations so if a mod checked them they'd probably know also mods know ips so they can check all the Lithuanian ones they have and found out.
Manletmachines lawyer:
Defence counsel (female lawyer) confirmed her client accepted making “totally unacceptable and horrible” comments.
She argued that manlet, who is studying at (a place wont dox where), has an attention deficit disorder and no history of aggression.
Referring to the photo outside the woman’s house, Ms lawyer submitted: “He says it was done in a poor attempt at humour, there was no attempted threat.”
Manlet was refused bail and remanded in custody until May 7.
Firstly it's so fucking ironic the man who's sent thousands of messages hating woman is getting represented by a woman AHAHAHAHA. Anyways, this is maybe bad. Firstly, the woman lawyer could secretly try and get my nigga a longer jail sentence as she simply doesn't like his views. She could do this by presenting a sloppy defence case and thus he'll get fucked more. Hopefully, she could just give him a good defense and defend him well regardless of what he's said and hopefully he won't be charged with anything (very unlikely).
So the defense the lawyer gave was basically it was a joke guys: Ms lawyer submitted: “He says it was done in a poor attempt at humour, there was no attempted threat.” this is a weak fucking defence. other more viable defences could have been.
Now let me give you help as to what manletmachines legal defence could be:
Challenging the Legal Elements of the Offense
- Lack of "Course of Conduct": Argue that the defendant’s actions (e.g., reposting videos and comments) do not meet the threshold of a "course of conduct" (at least two incidents). If posts were isolated or spread over a long period, this could weaken the claim.
- No Intent or Reasonable Perception of Harm: Contest whether the defendant intended to cause distress or whether a reasonable person would foresee the harm. For example, claim the comments were misguided criticism rather than targeted harassment.
2. Evidentiary Challenges
- Disputing Responsibility: Challenge digital evidence linking the defendant to the posts (e.g., IP address inaccuracies, account sharing, or hacking claims).
- Questioning the Victim’s Distress: Scrutinize the evidence of the victim’s distress (e.g., inconsistent testimony, lack of medical/psychological reports).
3. Free Expression Arguments
- Article 10 ECHR (Freedom of Expression): Argue that the posts, while offensive, were lawful expressions of opinion. This is a high bar given the UK’s balancing of free speech against harassment, but context (e.g., public interest in the videos) might be raised.
4. Contextual or Procedural Defenses
- Publicly Available Material: If the videos were already public (e.g., on social media), argue the defendant merely shared existing content without malicious intent.
- Procedural Errors: Highlight improper evidence collection (e.g., breaches of data protection laws) to exclude key evidence.
5. Reasonableness and Legitimate Purpose
- Legitimate Motive: Claim the posts served a lawful purpose (e.g., exposing wrongdoing, satire), though this is speculative unless supported by evidence.
- Reasonable Conduct" Defense: Assert the defendant’s actions were reasonable in context (e.g., responding to provocation, though UK law rarely accepts this for harassment).
6. Mental Health or Mitigating Factors
- Mental State:While not a full defense, evidence of mental health issues might reduce culpability or influence sentencing (e.g., arguing diminished capacity).
7. Jurisdictional or Temporal Issues
- Timing of Incidents: If incidents occurred far apart, argue they do not form a coherent "course of conduct."
Key Considerations:
-Prosecution Burden: The prosecution must prove both the conduct and its impact. Defense strategies often focus on creating reasonable doubt in these areas.
He could use some of these defences like mental health or show she wasn't in fact distressed this is probably how it will go. But it looks bad
What manletmachines fate will be:
Manlet was refused bail and remanded in custody until May 7.
Deputy District (female judge) ruled: “The real concerns relate to the potential for re-offending and interference with the witness.”
It looks bad he was refused bail so the judge thinks he's a threat. If seen this way he'll get many years behind bars as they don't want a threat to safety outside. Also what really fucked this guy over was obviously the rape and murder threats but mainly taking a picture outside her home. When you go out of ur way and take a picture outside her house you are showing that you are capable of going out of your way to cause harm and potentially this could lead to him causing harm to Niamharina.
How other users can avoid arrest:
Firstly don't be like manletmachine don't incessantly post tik toks of women in your local area and make rape or murder comments on them. Don't then visit her house and take a pic. Also as for opsec what you would want to do is not have a apple as the uk government has a backdoor for all apple devices. So don't use apple. even though its against the rules you could (not that I recommend it because it breaks the rules) login with cafe WiFi far away from your actual home and use a encrypted email like proton. So they can't use ur email address to find your address.
The ultimate option to protect yourself (again I don't support this) you could ask someone from a third world country or one with lax laws like Brazil and Iraq to make you an account so there ip and WiFi will be in the websites history then ask them to give u the details for the login to his account and use it how you want. However this website logs every ip you have when u login so you'd have to also use a vpn before u login everytime. This is high effort but probably the best way.
Finally stay safe guys don't post weird messages like rape or murder and never attempt to harass anybody. And manlet machine we wish u the best.
disclaimer:
Mods I'm not doxxing manletmachine by revealing revealing the police statement and I didn't show the article. Also I blocked out all names and places and this is very informative to help others on what not to do
Also mods tell me did u help law enforcement and give a public response to one of our members getting arrested:
@Master
@NumbThePain
@Gargantuan
@highinhibcel
Everything I post, or have posted, on this site are source of parody, satire, humour and for entertainment purposes only. I am not liable for any emotional or physical damage caused by my posts, nor is that my intention. I do not intend to influence any other users' posts, nor do I adhere to politically incorrect or illegal posts on this site. When I post here I'm playing a character one that fits the bill of this forum this isn't the real me this is a purely fictional character. I support each and every attempt from law enforcement to bring anyone breaking the law into custody and jail.
Last edited:
