D
Deleted member 6380
Af jooga looma adeego
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 12,157
- Reputation
- 14,130
Title
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
depends, there's 2 types of hypertrophy, myofribillar (hypertrophy of the muscle fibers, think powerlifters) and sarcoplasmic (more fluid, bigger muscles like bodybuilders but not necessarily stronger)Title
basically sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is a pump, imo higher reps at lower weight is better for itdepends, there's 2 types of hypertrophy, myofribillar (hypertrophy of the muscle fibers, think powerlifters) and sarcoplasmic (more fluid, bigger muscles like bodybuilders but not necessarily stronger)
It's not bullshit at all, fast twitch muscle fibres are much easier to build and grow faster in response to strength training which in turns makes you stronger.All that fast vs slow etc is bullshit, sure slow fibers are weaker but they are also smaller which means you can have more of them in the same volume compared to fast twitch muscles.
In the end strength is mostly determined by leverage, leverage can be improved by hypertrophying muscle and tendons at certain places.
Bruh what about the argument that fast-twitch fibers are bulky and they take a lot of space, while slow-twitch fibers are denser? Sure on a fiber per fiber basis, fast twitch fibers are much stronger, but I think on a volume per volume basis they were only 10% stronger.It's not bullshit at all, fast twitch muscle fibres are much easier to build and grow faster in response to strength training which in turns makes you stronger.
This is why powerlifters do low high explosive reps or explosive reps in generally.
But in response to OP, yes its collerated but other things such as bone density, muscle balance, body weight, limbs ratio (leverage), tendons and ligaments also have big impact on strength.