How is it even possible for God to exist

[Chad69]

Give me one explanation
Just one lol

 

[Deleted member 11414]

God is a concept not a being

 

[Deleted member 4430]

he does not

 

[Kekee]

Because your family worshipped him and so he made you the tallest an actual human being can be. Like Napoleon.

Everyone above 5'8" is Nephilim genes aka subhuman.

 

[Kekee]

And God exists within your mind. Just like I have over 100 virgin trad wives who I have sex with each time I fap.

 

[Looks234]

He’s answered my prayers before. No cap.

 

[Haven]

Give me one explanation
Just one lol

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

Learn the Contingency Argument, it is impossible to debunk

The argument is pretty straight forward

There are 3 types of existences:
• Impossible existences: Something which cannot be like a squared circle
• Possible existences: It has 3 characteristics, 1-It's dependant (The thing relies on something else in order for it to exist). 2-It could have been any other way. (Some determinists say it couldn't. It could be any other way if you exclude it's dependance of the Necessary Being. A determinist is someone who believes in a causal chain of events, however if you delete the causal chain and you have just this thing in isolation by itself, then this thing could be in any other way, so there is no requirement for it to be in any other way.) 3-If you take it out of existence absurdities don't happen (In other words, existence does not depend on it. For example 23 years ago i wasn't born, which means all of existence doesn't require me to exist for it's own existence)
• Necessary existences: Something which all Possible Existences depends upon, and it depends upon nothing (if you don't have this, you will not have existence)

The contingency argument is: There cannot be a world of only Possible Existences. Therefore, there must be a Necessary Existence

Analogy: If i go to the sea, i know there must be a sea floor. I know that because i realize that water cannot continously balance upon itself and hold itself up without there being a foundational thing which holds it up, mantains it, sustains it.

• The Necessary Existence must be always existing (Post-Eternal and Pre-Eternal). If there was a time where the Neccesary Existence is not an existence then there could not be any existence.

• The Necessary Existence must be Uncaused. Someone might not believe in causation, that doesn't matter because if it was Caused, then what it is Caused by? It leads to Infinite Regression.

• It must be Self Suficient. Everything depends upon it and it depends upon nothing. Otherwise it would be a Possible Existence. Everything goes back to it.

Quick Resume: Either things are Dependant, or they are Independent, and you cannot have Regress of Dependent things, therefore there must be One Thing that is Independent.

 

[Chad69]

Learn the Contingency Argument, it is impossible to debunk

The argument is pretty straight forward

There are 3 types of existences:
• Impossible existences: Something which cannot be like a squared circle
• Possible existences: It has 3 characteristics, 1-It's dependant (The thing relies on something else in order for it to exist). 2-It could have been any other way. (Some determinists say it couldn't. It could be any other way if you exclude it's dependance of the Necessary Being. A determinist is someone who believes in a causal chain of events, however if you delete the causal chain and you have just this thing in isolation by itself, then this thing could be in any other way, so there is no requirement for it to be in any other way.) 3-If you take it out of existence absurdities don't happen (In other words, existence does not depend on it. For example 23 years ago i wasn't born, which means all of existence doesn't require me to exist for it's own existence)
• Necessary existences: Something which all Possible Existences depends upon, and it depends upon nothing (if you don't have this, you will not have existence)

The contingency argument is: There cannot be a world of only Possible Existences. Therefore, there must be a Necessary Existence

Analogy: If i go to the sea, i know there must be a sea floor. I know that because i realize that water cannot continously balance upon itself and hold itself up without there being a foundational thing which holds it up, mantains it, sustains it.

• The Necessary Existence must be always existing (Post-Eternal and Pre-Eternal). If there was a time where the Neccesary Existence is not an existence then there could not be any existence.

• The Necessary Existence must be Uncaused. Someone might not believe in causation, that doesn't matter because if it was Caused, then what it is Caused by? It leads to Infinite Regression.

• It must be Self Suficient. Everything depends upon it and it depends upon nothing. Otherwise it would be a Possible Existence. Everything goes back to it.

Quick Resume: Either things are Dependant, or they are Independent, and you cannot have Regress of Dependent things, therefore there must be One Thing that is Independent.

Dn rd he doesn’t exist

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

Dn rd he doesn’t exist

Then what is the matter in your case, you want an argument for the existence of a Creator or you just want a justification for the Creator not existing?

The vast majority (if not every) atheists i know are atheists because of emotional reasons, not because of intellectual reasons. "I was a muslim or a christian but my practicing father striked me, therefore God doesn't exist", or "I am LGBT and the main religions don't like it, therefore God doesn't exist" or "My mother told me to ask God when i was a kid to heal my grandfather, yet he didn't heal, therefore God doesn't exist"

Or the analogy of the rent: I rent a house, but i want to make reforms and change somethings, yet the house has an Owner. Therefore what i can do is to deny the Owner and then proceed to do whatever i want. It doesn't matter whether one denies it or not, matter of fact He allows you to do that, but he is still the owner of the house.

The only difference among believers and atheists is that the average atheist has some words to hide behind at the beggining of a conversation that may sound intellectual, but when you get into it's philosophy you find it is illogical. They start asking old philosophical questions which some believers don't know how to respond even tho they are easy like "Who created God?" and the conversation ends there.

 

[animo123]

Dn rd he doesn’t exist

0+0=1