D
Deleted member 23558
God make my neurotransmitters great inc
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2022
- Posts
- 64,842
- Reputation
- 91,247
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What if the child made you horny thoI mean the kid isn't naked or performing a sexual act, still a weird thing to post online though
It didn't because I'm not a nonceWhat if the child made you horny tho
Find God or something
The irony “milk enjoyer “Find God or something
ARTICLE 227-23
(Act no. 98-468 of 17 June 1998 Article 17 Official Journal of 18 June 1998)
(Ordinance no. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September 2000 in force 1 January 2002)
(Act No. 2002-305 of 4 March 2002 Article 14 Official Journal of 5 March 2002)
(Act no. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 article 6 VII Official Journal of 10 March 2004)
Taking, recording or transmitting a picture or representation of a minor with a view to circulating it, where that image
or representation has a pornographic character, is punished by three years' imprisonment and a fine of €45,000.
Attempting to do so is subject to the same penalties.
The same penalty applies to offering or distributing such a picture or representation by any means, and to importing
or exporting it, or causing it to be imported or exported.
The penalties are increased to five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 where use was made of a
communication network for the circulation of messages to an unrestricted public in order to circulate the image or
representation of a minor.
Possessing such an image or representation is punished by two years' imprisonment and a fine of €30,000.
The offences set out in the second, third and fourth paragraphs are punished by ten years' imprisonment and by a
fine of €500,000 where they are committed by an organised gang.
The provisions of the present article also apply to the pornographic images of a person whose physical appearance
is that of a minor unless it is proved that the person was over eighteen on the day his picture was taken or recorded.
Exactly what I was thinking.a solid place for the police to find potential pedos in the comments, because these fetishes have a high positive correlation with pedophilia
The provisions of the present article also apply to the pornographic images of a person whose physical appearancebecause of this (took Code pénal for example, but these provisions are nearly identical everywhere in the first world)
a solid place for the police to find potential pedos in the comments, because these fetishes have a high positive correlation with pedophilia