How is this fucking legal

I mean the kid isn't naked or performing a sexual act, still a weird thing to post online though
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
I mean the kid isn't naked or performing a sexual act, still a weird thing to post online though
What if the child made you horny tho
 
  • JFL
Reactions: pentamogged9000
If you think im really going to click that you are surely mistaken!
 
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall and Deleted member 23558
Do you self insert as the child
 
ARTICLE 227-23
(Act no. 98-468 of 17 June 1998 Article 17 Official Journal of 18 June 1998)
(Ordinance no. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September 2000 in force 1 January 2002)
(Act No. 2002-305 of 4 March 2002 Article 14 Official Journal of 5 March 2002)
(Act no. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 article 6 VII Official Journal of 10 March 2004)

Taking, recording or transmitting a picture or representation of a minor with a view to circulating it, where that image
or representation has a pornographic character
, is punished by three years' imprisonment and a fine of €45,000.
Attempting to do so is subject to the same penalties.

The same penalty applies to offering or distributing such a picture or representation by any means, and to importing
or exporting it, or causing it to be imported or exported.

The penalties are increased to five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 where use was made of a
communication network for the circulation of messages to an unrestricted public in order to circulate the image or
representation of a minor.

Possessing such an image or representation is punished by two years' imprisonment and a fine of €30,000.
The offences set out in the second, third and fourth paragraphs are punished by ten years' imprisonment and by a
fine of €500,000 where they are committed by an organised gang.

The provisions of the present article also apply to the pornographic images of a person whose physical appearance
is that of a minor unless it is proved that the person was over eighteen on the day his picture was taken or recorded.

because of this (took Code pénal for example, but these provisions are nearly identical everywhere in the first world)

a solid place for the police to find potential pedos in the comments, because these fetishes have a high positive correlation with pedophilia
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
So mom's who breastfeed in public do CP?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
a solid place for the police to find potential pedos in the comments, because these fetishes have a high positive correlation with pedophilia
Exactly what I was thinking.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 41079
because of this (took Code pénal for example, but these provisions are nearly identical everywhere in the first world)

a solid place for the police to find potential pedos in the comments, because these fetishes have a high positive correlation with pedophilia
The provisions of the present article also apply to the pornographic images of a person whose physical appearance
is that of a minor unless it is proved that the person was over eighteen on the day his picture was taken or recorded.


This is so insane
 

Similar threads

Sasukecel
Serious Legal Action
Replies
25
Views
532
chadhamed
chadhamed
Brus Wane
Replies
7
Views
130
Primalsplit
Primalsplit
auitistsurvior
Replies
8
Views
136
spermium
spermium
Alexanderr
Replies
45
Views
823
klip11
klip11
StraightHeadJames
Replies
10
Views
112
h111
h111

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top