HOW MANY OF YOU MANLETS ARE ON THIS REDDIT SUB?!

[Deleted member 22780]

That doesn't make a lot of sense due to the sole fact that the average height is increasing and has been increasing for the past millennia
Now sure you could maybe try to attribute this to the factor of the environment improving thus making it easier for people to fulfil their genetic potential

But we know that height is highly heritable, having a heritability rate of around 0.8. Meaning, tall people have tall children, small people have small children etc
Put 1+1 together and you come the conclusion that the average height is increasing because people who are taller than average are having more children

This theory has also been proved by multiple studies, one being this which explains why the dutch are so tall

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.0211

- For men, there was a curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success, with taller than average men producing both a larger number of ever born children and more surviving children

No denying that

 

[Deleted member 21661]

better than slaying in USA, women are hypergamous and ethnic tax is real and even if women in europe are also hypergamous they have less fatties, uglies and ethnics so even just getting 5% match rate would yield success, about to install every dating app and post my best pics

The women in Europe seem far better looking tbh

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Don’t you always slurp white cocks though? Have you seen the European birthrates vs. African, or is it somehow invalid now or muh jews

The major increase we currently see in African birth rates aren't sustainable
Sure you could pass your genes on for one generation but it doesn't really matter when the child dies at 4 due to starvation, thats your entire lineage finished

Passing on your genes also encompasses having your genes passed on for a multitude of generations subsequently

 

[Deleted member 18522]

That doesn't make a lot of sense due to the sole fact that the average height is increasing and has been increasing for the past millennia
Now sure you could maybe try to attribute this to the factor of the environment improving thus making it easier for people to fulfil their genetic potential

But we know that height is highly heritable, having a heritability rate of around 0.8. Meaning, tall people have tall children, small people have small children etc
Put 1+1 together and you come the conclusion that the average height is increasing because people who are taller than average are having more children

This theory has also been proved by multiple studies, one being this which explains why the dutch are so tall

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.0211

- For men, there was a curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success, with taller than average men producing both a larger number of ever born children and more surviving children

Nah, if you look at the median it doesn't change.

Only super short or super tall people have less children than the rest(2 sd from mean)

Meaning a 5'8 man on average has more children than a 6'4" man

Being a manlet has zero correlation with reproductive success

For the Dutch the height "studies" could just as easily be attributed to socioeconomic status when comparing a country that rapidly develops. Which makes sense as height equalized between children after 1980.

I could just as easily say the world is populated by manlets in india and asia to say short people have better genes

 

[Deleted member 18522]

No denying that

Height increase happens 95% because of diet and if this were the case women who are short would also have less children for it to make a substantial difference

 

[Jason Voorhees]

My god. That sub is funny. Haha

 

[Deleted member 4362]

The major increase we currently see in African birth rates aren't sustainable
Sure you could pass your genes on for one generation but it doesn't really matter when the child dies at 4 due to starvation, thats your entire lineage finished

Passing on your genes also encompasses having your genes passed on for a multitude of generations subsequently

Yeah ok, the people who have been on the earth the longest out of everyone jfl.

What about in their own countries though? Like the USA where they are projected to be a minority to a growing minority pop. or even some Western European countries

 

[Chinacurry]

better than slaying in USA, women are hypergamous and ethnic tax is real and even if women in europe are also hypergamous they have less fatties, uglies and ethnics so even just getting 5% match rate would yield success, about to install every dating app and post my best pics

Jfl there is no ethnic tax in Europe at all (possibly in Spain cos swarthy dark looks are seen as less refined than fully white visigoth Iberian looks, they would prefer Sergio Ramos over Madrid legend Raul, for example).

Aside from that there's no ethnic tax if ur GL, robust, broad, not short, forward grown face, and not low T.

There's minimal ethnic tax in large USA or UK cities too, same ID say for Australia despite people saying it's most racist country by fat.

Prob only place there is ethnic tax would be, IMO, Honk Kong, Korea, and poss Singapore but can't say for sure.

 

[Deleted member 22780]

My god. That sub is funny. Haha

It’s like blackpill vs bluepill. No one gets banned no matter what u say jfl

 

[Deleted member 18522]

Jfl there is no ethnic tax in Europe at all (possibly in Spain cos swarthy dark looks are seen as less refined than fully white visigoth Iberian looks, they would prefer Sergio Ramos over Madrid legend Raul, for example).

Aside from that there's no ethnic tax if ur GL, robust, broad, not short, forward grown face, and not low T.

There's minimal ethnic tax in large USA or UK cities too, same ID say for Australia despite people saying it's most racist country by fat.

Prob only place there is ethnic tax would be, IMO, Honk Kong, Korea, and poss Singapore but can't say for sure.

USA has a massive ethnic tax. Especially for Curries or Asians but contrary to popular belief, most black americans are also incel with nonblack women. Latinos and lightskins have the minimal ethnic tax but white looks are extremely legit here

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Nah, if you look at the median it doesn't change.

Only super short or super tall people have less children than the rest(2 sd from mean)

Meaning a 5'8 man on average has more children than a 6'4" man

Being a manlet has zero correlation with reproductive success

For the Dutch the height "studies" could just as easily be attributed to socioeconomic status when comparing a country that rapidly develops. Which makes sense as height equalized between children after 1980.

I could just as easily say the world is populated by manlets in india and asia to say short people have better genes

I'm talking primarily in the west here, we don't live in india or china so theyre irrelevant
Literally every study shows men that are taller than average (not substantially taller bc then it becomes a failo) have higher rates of reproductive success so yes being a manlet does correlate with not being able to pass on your genes or having a harder time to do so
It's also extremely common knowledge that women find men that are tall/taller than them, more physically attractive

Being taller than average = indicator of genetic superiority
Being smaller than average = indicator of genetic inferiority

Simply put, being small makes you less attractive to the opposite sex, which is water idek why im having to explain this

 

[Chinacurry]

USA has a massive ethnic tax. Especially for Curries or Asians but contrary to popular belief, most black americans are also incel with nonblack women. Latinos and lightskins have the minimal ethnic tax but white looks are extremely legit here

Ok, I never experienced it in USA, so different experience all together.

I identify as Indian

 

[Deleted member 22780]

I'm talking primarily in the west here, we don't live in india or china so theyre irrelevant
Literally every study shows men that are taller than average (not substantially taller bc then it becomes a failo) have higher rates of reproductive success so yes being a manlet does correlate with not being able to pass on your genes or having a harder time to do so
It's also extremely common knowledge that women find men that are tall/taller than them, more physically attractive

Being taller than average = indicator of genetic superiority
Being smaller than average = indicator of genetic inferiority

Simply put, being small makes you less attractive to the opposite sex, which is water idek why im having to explain this

They’re being weird. It’s literally so water

 

[Deleted member 18522]

I'm talking primarily in the west here, we don't live in india or china so theyre irrelevant
Literally every study shows men that are taller than average (not substantially taller bc then it becomes a failo) have higher rates of reproductive success so yes being a manlet does correlate with not being able to pass on your genes or having a harder time to do so
It's also extremely common knowledge that women find men that are tall/taller than them, more physically attractive

Being taller than average = indicator of genetic superiority
Being smaller than average = indicator of genetic inferiority

Simply put, being small makes you less attractive to the opposite sex, which is water idek why im having to explain this

if its the west then wouldn't that mean its cultural/social like the redditor said?

And if it were a genetic thing then wouldn't it not matter if India or China

Also fucking lmfao at this low iq black pill metaphysics, women with big butt have more men wanting to fuck them but that doesnt mean small butt woman are genetically inferior, they're just less dimorphic so give less tingles but then again there are men who get tingles for small boob just like for women and shorter men

 

[Deleted member 18522]

They’re being weird. It’s literally so water

Nah you can say short men are less attractive on average but you can't say their genes are inferior

Literally two different things entirely, like saying rich men have superior genes because more women want to fuck them than poor niggas

 

[Deleted member 22780]

Nah you can say short men are less attractive on average but you can't say their genes are inferior

Literally two different things entirely, like saying rich men have superior genes because more women want to fuck them than poor niggas

Rich isn’t entirely due to genetics tho. Height is literally like 80-90 percent genetics. African niggas r dying of starvation yet still 6’4

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Yeah ok, the people who have been on the earth the longest out of everyone jfl.

What about in their own countries though? Like the USA where they are projected to be a minority to a growing minority pop. or even some Western European countries

Well what do you think happens when you have a population of 500 million and the average citizen can barely do their times tables correctly thanks to an inefficient education system, low average iq and abysmal standards of living/poverty rates

Societal collapse and a population bottleneck

Africas current birth rates and surplus in population size are by no means sustainable
Its a recipe for disaster


As for whites becoming minorities in their own nations, that's also them being retarded

 

[Deleted member 18522]

Rich isn’t entirely due to genetics tho. Height is literally like 80-90 percent genetics. African niggas r dying of starvation yet still 6’4

would women with small butts have worse genetics?

height is only 50% genetics max and even if were 100% genetics it wouldn't matter across sexes, men would be chasing 6'4" women.

attractiveness/dimorphism aren't the same thing as genetic quality stop being low IQ and read a biology book

 

[Deleted member 22780]

would women with small butts have worse genetics?

height is only 50% genetics max and even if were 100% genetics it wouldn't matter across sexes, men would be chasing 6'4" women.

attractiveness/dimorphism aren't the same thing as genetic quality stop being low IQ and read a biology book

But height also dictates fighting success in primal times when food was scarce fighting was necessary. Big butts are irrelevant in that sense.

 

[Deleted member 4362]

African niggas r dying of starvation yet still 6’4

@PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[Deleted member 18522]

But height also dictates fighting success in primal times when food was scarce fighting was necessary. Big butts are irrelevant in that sense.

humans evolved to have worse fighting success, bigger heads and higher IQs.

big butts are a sign of estrogen at least 50%

 

[Deleted member 21340]

if its the west then wouldn't that mean its cultural/social like the redditor said?

And if it were a genetic thing then wouldn't it not matter if India or China

Also fucking lmfao at this low iq black pill metaphysics, women with big butt have more men wanting to fuck them but that doesnt mean small butt woman are genetically inferior, they're just less dimorphic so give less tingles but then again there are men who get tingles for small boob just like for women and shorter men

Youre not understanding the concept of genetic inferiority
As I said prior
Genetic inferiority = failure to have ones genes passed on
Not being able to cause those little tingles which deem physical attraction is a sign of genetic inferiority
Being physically unattractive = genetically inferior - Your chances of passing on your genes have been decreased sustainably thanks to your genetic makeup being worse than the average populous

 

[Deleted member 22099]

Yup. Women r so surprised when their sons turn out manlets despite being 5’1 themselves

This is why I'm never wifing up a girl under 5'10 like Dwight said in the office "I want a large family. I mean a physically large, tall family".

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Rich isn’t entirely due to genetics tho. Height is literally like 80-90 percent genetics. African niggas r dying of starvation yet still 6’4

@PrinceLuenLeoncur

Depends on the African, some are lanky fuckers even when starving and others do rely on nutrition to be tall. Southern Nigerians are manlets but in the west (raised/born) most are minimum 5’10

Though starving Nilotes, Somalis and Senegalese for example are like 6’2+ despite not having eaten a meal for 2 months from the age of 2. I dunno how it works

 

[Deleted member 22780]

humans evolved to have worse fighting success, bigger heads and higher IQs.

big butts are a sign of estrogen at least 50%

Fighting success is still relevant in today’s time. Height is a sign of strong genetics. It aids in fighting and mating. If you lack height u r thus genetically hindered in many aspects.

 

[Deleted member 22099]

The major increase we currently see in African birth rates aren't sustainable
Sure you could pass your genes on for one generation but it doesn't really matter when the child dies at 4 due to starvation, thats your entire lineage finished

Passing on your genes also encompasses having your genes passed on for a multitude of generations subsequently

What's your point with this you don't think Africa's gonna keep growing as fast? Nigeria is at like 200 million and shows no sign of slowing

 

[Deleted member 22780]

This is why I'm never wifing up a girl under 5'10 like Dwight said in the office "I want a large family. I mean a physically large, tall family".

I’ve accepted that my son will be screwed. He’s gonna be giga manlet

 

[Lecherous]

I love Reddit tbh tbh

 

[Deleted member 22780]

View attachment 1973112

I used to troll so much but then got perma banned

 

[Deleted member 22099]

I’ve accepted that my son will be screwed. He’s gonna be giga manlet

If your baby mama is smaller than you just use a 7'0 sperm donor tbh

 

[Lecherous]

I used to troll so much but then got perma banned

what kind of trolling did you do?

 

[Deleted member 22780]

If your baby mama is smaller than you just use a 7'0 sperm donor tbh

Ultimate cuckery unlocked

 

[Deleted member 21340]

What's your point with this you don't think Africa's gonna keep growing as fast? Nigeria is at like 200 million and shows no sign of slowing

I think the rapid expansion in sub saharan africas population size will only lead to catastrophic events such as mass famines, civil wars, ethnic conflicts, genocide and so on
Its not sustainable and will eventually slow down

 

[Deleted member 18522]

Genetic inferiority = failure to have ones genes passed on

which isn't true, tall and short people have the same number of kids within margin of error.

in fact in many cases the short people have more children cuz of ethnicity factors

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Depends on the African, some are lanky fuckers even when starving and others do rely on nutrition to be tall. Southern Nigerians are manlets but in the west (raised/born) most are minimum 5’10

Though starving Nilotes, Somalis and Senegalese for example are like 6’2+ despite not having eaten a meal for 2 months from the age of 2. I dunno how it works

Lol that’s bs, the ones that grow tall aren’t starving, I agree Somalis can be height moggers but when they are malnourished they look like those small peanut head memes

 

[Deleted member 22780]

what kind of trolling did you do?

Make fun of ugly chicks on rateme and online dating profile ratings. Make fun of manlets and people of color. Just absolutely anything for cage reacts

 

[Deleted member 18522]

Fighting success is still relevant in today’s time. Height is a sign of strong genetics. It aids in fighting and mating. If you lack height u r thus genetically hindered in many aspects.

How many times have you gotten in a fight in your life unless you live in grounds zero nigga ville it should be zero like 90% of men and even then the height is far less relevant than weight.

meaning fat short niggas would beat skinny tall nigga

 

[Lecherous]

Make fun of ugly chicks on rateme and online dating profile ratings. Make fun of manlets and people of color. Just absolutely anything for cage reacts

kekfuel, but are you a manlet yourself?

 

[Deleted member 22099]

I think the rapid expansion in sub saharan africas population size will only lead to catastrophic events such as mass famines, civil wars, ethnic conflicts, genocide and so on
Its not sustainable and will eventually slow down

I think Africa will never ascend to the first world but people will keep emigrating so eventually like 30% of Europe will be black.

 

[Deleted member 22780]

kekfuel, but are you a manlet yourself?

I’m 5’8 but niggas on Reddit don’t know that. Jfl

 

[Deleted member 21340]

which isn't true, tall and short people have the same number of kids within margin of error.

in fact in many cases the short people have more children cuz of ethnicity factors

- and that taller men have higher fertility compared with shorter men

Literally just read the study i linked, it rebukes the vast majority of points
idk where youre getting this tall/short people have the same rates of reproductive success garbage cope from
well thats unless you only consider everyone above the height of 6'5 to be tall

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Lol that’s bs, the ones that grow tall aren’t starving, I agree Somalis can be height moggers but when they are malnourished they look like those small peanut head memes

Nah it’s true man the groups I mentioned are a result tall even when malnourished height is somewhat genetic. Now for southern Nigerian as an example yes they need food to be tall or they will be like 5’6-7 manlets but if you feed them most will become 5’10+. But Senegalese (other west African) are just built tall even when starving

 

[Deleted member 21340]

I think Africa will never ascend to the first world but people will keep emigrating so eventually like 30% of Europe will be black.

Highly highly doubt europeans will let that happen
We're already seeing a rise in anti immigration and right wing politicians in countries with high rates of non european immigration such as france

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Nah it’s true man the groups I mentioned are a result tall even when malnourished height is somewhat genetic. Now for southern Nigerian as an example yes they need food to be tall or they will be like 5’6-7 manlets but if you feed them most will become 5’10+. But Senegalese (other west African) are just built tall even when starving

imagine the average height of the Southern Sudanese Dinkas with a proper western nutrition

they would be gigamoggers

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

imagine the average height of the Southern Sudanese Dinkas with a proper western nutrition

they would be gigamoggers

The British said they were 6’4 on avg, I dunno how true that is but I haven’t ever met a short Southern sudani. Punjabis are also tall asf specifically the Indian punjabis not the paki ones but they are also tall compared to other groups in Asia. Lebenese as well are quite tall as Arabs are usually manlets but not lebenese

 

[Moggie]

LL is suifuel man
You gain 2 inches but walk around in crutches for a year, spend 100K and have shit mobility after that. Apparently wearing lifts is hard too. Height is brutal because it's one thing you cannot change

just get ll out the back of an iranian hospital

 

[Deleted member 21661]

The British said they were 6’4 on avg, I dunno how true that is but I haven’t ever met a short Southern sudani. Punjabis are also tall asf specifically the Indian punjabis not the paki ones but they are also tall compared to other groups in Asia. Lebenese as well are quite tall as Arabs are usually manlets but not lebenese

my punjabi grandfather is tall af. Decided to marry a womanlet. Brutal

 

[Deleted member 21340]

The British said they were 6’4 on avg, I dunno how true that is but I haven’t ever met a short Southern sudani. Punjabis are also tall asf specifically the Indian punjabis not the paki ones but they are also tall compared to other groups in Asia. Lebenese as well are quite tall as Arabs are usually manlets but not lebenese

Average Dinka male was reported to have a height of 5'11 in the 1950s
The malnourished dinka refugee males have an average height of 5'9 which is akin to a lot of first world european countries

With a diet catered around maximising ones height I reckon the average Dinka male could get to 6'2+

 

[Deleted member 18522]

- and that taller men have higher fertility compared with shorter men

Literally just read the study i linked, it rebukes the vast majority of points
idk where youre getting this tall/short people have the same rates of reproductive success garbage cope from
well thats unless you only consider everyone above the height of 6'5 to be tall

It equalized by the time it reach 1980s, the height was probably a proxy for economic status

'Average' height yields most children

Women might dream of tall, dark and handsome, but researchers are claiming that it is men of "average" height that are having the most children.

www.bbc.com

In modern societies height doesn't correlate with ability to have children

"

The peak number of children, 2.57, was found in men who were 177.79cm. Men who were 6cm taller or shorter (coming in at approximately 5ft 7in or 6ft) had 2.52 children. Going another 6cm away from the peak gave 2.36 children on average.
"

Meaning men who are 6'3" have less children than men who are 5'8"

 

[Deleted member 4362]

- and that taller men have higher fertility compared with shorter men

That’s a bit misleading given the role environment & nutrition plays in height