How many surgeries away are you from

[foidletslayer]

no, I just make leading questions to understand your position more properly but it seems like you can't do that with this circular reasoning

My reasoning isn’t circular; it’s linear. U might just lack comprehension tbf w/u.

you claimed that i'm submissive and a foid but you are trying to avoid it by saying that foid part was satirical. therefore explain why am i submissive

It was obviously satirical from the start, your submissiveness shows in how readily you comply with other users’ vulgarity, I’ve observed it far too often to ignore

 

[theRetard]

My reasoning isn’t circular; it’s linear. U might just lack comprehension tbf w/u.

you are submissive->because you are deflecting instead of defending->deflection is submissive->so you are submissive->because you are deflecting instead of defending

It was obviously satirical from the start, your submissiveness shows in how readily you comply with other users’ vulgarity, I’ve observed it far too often to ignore

point it where i comply with you/somebody?

 

[theRetard]

aggressive emotional bitchy defense: good
reasonable deflection: muh muh submissive muh feminine

 

[foidletslayer]

you were saying that my grammar is shit, now you are avoiding it by saying that it's my reasoning is shit lo

You’re grammar is shit I’ll point it out right now

GRAMMAR CLAIMS PROVEN
Example

no, I just make leading questions to understand your position more properly but it seems like you can't do that with this circular reasoning

“I just make leading questions” doest’t make sense to any native speaker because of tense mismatch, it should be “I just ask leading question”

Same here

but you are trying to debate the burden of proof concept indirectly, but you don't really explaining why the burden of proof is bad, you just call it submissive

You’re redundant with words, such as ‘but’. Saying “but you don’t really explaining why” is incorrect usage of a verb it should be you’re not really explaining. You also used concept wrong it should’ve been said in this manner “the concept of…”

MY REASONING against YOURS : (Jfl at any mistake)
It’s clear u’ve missed the point entirely. U’ve latched yourself onto the phrase “burden of proof” as if repeating it somehow shields you from engaging with what was actually said. I’ve already explained why deflection signals submission: it’s an avoidance of responsibility that shifts control to the accuser. Yet instead of addressing that reasoning, you’ve chosen to echo it back while pretending to question it, performing sophistication couldn’t replace understanding in a million years buddy. Plus you aren’t dissecting my logic u’re orbiting it. U keep on Asking me to explain what has already been explained Jfl, retarded stall tactic. The more you insist on “clarification,” the more clear it becomes that u understood the argument but can’t confront it. All what you’re doing is just evading my reasoning.

but if you claim something you must explain it, why should i defend myself instead of deflecting?

You can clearly see here that I’ve already explained why you should always defend rather than deflect but you still insisted on to question it again for no reason, maybe to see more deep & sophisticated ig? Also u are indirectly uneducated or at the very least poorly educated, that’s if you have poor grammar or spelling.

FOID PART
the entire foid claim was based off of your pfp and your femininity at first LOL, I still do believe ur a foid I just don’t have any means to prove it as of now

Sorry for late reply was taking a fat constipatedshit brah

 

[foidletslayer]

you are submissive->because you are deflecting instead of defending->deflection is submissive->so you are submissive->because you are deflecting instead of defending

point it where i comply with you/somebody?

Read this

Deflection as a Defense Mechanism

Deflection is a defense mechanism that can undermine relationships. Learn why people deflect, signs that someone is deflecting, and strategies to cope.

www.verywellmind.com

 

[foidletslayer]

aggressive emotional bitchy defense: good
reasonable deflection: muh muh submissive muh feminine

I quite literally proved it ur just fucking too arrogant to accept it keep the cope boyo

Mirin the usage of my earlier prompt LOL

 

[slixzn]

already htn

How many surgeries away from what bro you cant be leaving us on a cliff hanger like that

 

[foidletslayer]

How many surgeries away from what bro you cant be leaving us on a cliff hanger like that

Read the body of the thread

 

[foidletslayer]

Read this

Deflection as a Defense Mechanism

Deflection is a defense mechanism that can undermine relationships. Learn why people deflect, signs that someone is deflecting, and strategies to cope.

www.verywellmind.com

Not going to bother replying to a retard anymore btw

 

[theRetard]

You’re grammar is shit I’ll point it out right now

GRAMMAR CLAIMS PROVEN
Example

“I just make leading questions” doest’t make sense to any native speaker because of tense mismatch, it should be “I just ask leading question”

Same here

You’re redundant with words, such as ‘but’. Saying “but you don’t really explaining why” is incorrect usage of a verb it should be you’re not really explaining. You also used concept wrong it should’ve been said in this manner “the concept of…”

MY REASONING against YOURS : (Jfl at any mistake)
It’s clear u’ve missed the point entirely. U’ve latched yourself onto the phrase “burden of proof” as if repeating it somehow shields you from engaging with what was actually said. I’ve already explained why deflection signals submission: it’s an avoidance of responsibility that shifts control to the accuser. Yet instead of addressing that reasoning, you’ve chosen to echo it back while pretending to question it, performing sophistication couldn’t replace understanding in a million years buddy. Plus you aren’t dissecting my logic u’re orbiting it. U keep on Asking me to explain what has already been explained Jfl, retarded stall tactic. The more you insist on “clarification,” the more clear it becomes that u understood the argument but can’t confront it. All what you’re doing is just evading my reasoning.



View attachment 4231865You can clearly see here that I’ve already explained why you should always defend rather than deflect but you still insisted on to question it again for no reason, maybe to see more deep & sophisticated ig? Also u are indirectly uneducated or at the very least poorly educated, that’s if you have poor grammar or spelling.

FOID PART
the entire foid claim was based off of your pfp and your femininity at first LOL, I still do believe ur a foid I just don’t have any means to prove it as of now

Sorry for late reply was taking a fat constipatedshit brah

read it all, wait

 

[foidletslayer]

read it all, wait

I guess so chump, but I’m neither replying nor reading anything else anymore, holy cortisol argument

 

[theRetard]

You’re grammar is shit I’ll point it out right now

GRAMMAR CLAIMS PROVEN
Example

“I just make leading questions” doest’t make sense to any native speaker because of tense mismatch, it should be “I just ask leading question”

Same here

You’re redundant with words, such as ‘but’. Saying “but you don’t really explaining why” is incorrect usage of a verb it should be you’re not really explaining. You also used concept wrong it should’ve been said in this manner “the concept of…”

i've never studied english rules tbh, so i agree my grammar might suck

MY REASONING against YOURS : (Jfl at any mistake)
It’s clear u’ve missed the point entirely. U’ve latched yourself onto the phrase “burden of proof” as if repeating it somehow shields you from engaging with what was actually said.

can you please debunk my burden of proof argument instead of saying muh muh it's just a shield. it's you are avoiding shit lol.

I’ve already explained why deflection signals submission: it’s an avoidance of responsibility that shifts control to the accuser. Yet instead of addressing that reasoning, you’ve chosen to echo it back while pretending to question it, performing sophistication couldn’t replace understanding in a million years buddy. Plus you aren’t dissecting my logic u’re orbiting it. U keep on Asking me to explain what has already been explained Jfl, retarded stall tactic. The more you insist on “clarification,” the more clear it becomes that u understood the argument but can’t confront it. All what you’re doing is just evading my reasoning.

>avoidance of responsibility that shifts control to the accuser

and why should i be responsible in explaining what is the accuser saying? your reasoning is gigaretarded lul

View attachment 4231865You can clearly see here that I’ve already explained why you should always defend rather than deflect but you still insisted on to question it again for no reason, maybe to see more deep & sophisticated ig? Also u are indirectly uneducated or at the very least poorly educated, that’s if you have poor grammar or spelling.

your reasoning is circular.
muh deflection is just avoidance->avoidance because it hands control to the claimer->so it is submissive->so it is submissive->it's submissive because it is just avoidance>avoidance because it hands control to the claimer->so it is submissive

FOID PART
the entire foid claim was based off of your pfp and your femininity at first LOL, I still do believe ur a foid I just don’t have any means to prove it as of now

Sorry for late reply was taking a fat constipatedshit brah

no problem cutie

 

[foidletslayer]

i've never studied english rules tbh, so i agree my grammar might suck

can you please debunk my burden of proof argument instead of saying muh muh it's just a shield. it's you are avoiding shit lol.

>avoidance of responsibility that shifts control to the accuser

and why should i be responsible in explaining what is the accuser saying? your reasoning is gigaretarded lul

your reasoning is circular.
muh deflection is just avoidance->avoidance because it hands control to the claimer->so it is submissive->so it is submissive->it's submissive because it is just avoidance>avoidance because it hands control to the claimer->so it is submissive


no problem cutie

DNRD & dnr have a good rest of ur day brocel

 

[theRetard]

DNRD & dnr have a good rest of ur day brocel

well keep losing debates

 

[foidletslayer]

well keep losing debates

Holy cortisol just forget it brah, I already said it’s senseless to argue with arrogant retards. Again have a good rest of ur day

 

[theRetard]

Read this

Deflection as a Defense Mechanism

Deflection is a defense mechanism that can undermine relationships. Learn why people deflect, signs that someone is deflecting, and strategies to cope.

www.verywellmind.com

>in relationships

 

[theRetard]

Holy cortisol just forget it brah, I already said it’s senseless to argue with arrogant retards. Again have a good rest of ur day

you are just using sophistry whole time.
and even this clain is retarded ad hominem

 

[theRetard]

I quite literally proved it ur just fucking too arrogant to accept it keep the cope boyo

Mirin the usage of my earlier prompt LOL

ok point it where you proved that

 

[foidletslayer]

you are just using sophistry whole time.
and even this clain is retarded ad hominem

It wasn’t but yeah bro whatever pleases u

 

[theRetard]

It wasn’t but yeah bro whatever pleases u

yeah not a sophistry bhai
uses: ad hominem, strawman, circular reasoning, refusing from burden of proof (claiming it a shield), false dichotomies etc
it's not a sophistry trust me bhai

 

[childishkillah]

Ascending to htn, most people need a surgery or 2 MAX, I myself need 1 surgery & a cut to reach true htn

None, i just need copious ammount of furosemide and low bf%

 

[dawooddX]

Ascending to htn, most people need a surgery or 2 MAX, I myself need 1 surgery & a cut to reach true htn

rhino and js sum leanness

 

[registerfasterusing]

Ascending to htn, most people need a surgery or 2 MAX, I myself need 1 surgery & a cut to reach true htn

Nononononono

 

[foidletslayer]

Nononononono

What nononono