how much side profile matter?

[Deleted member 14344]

title

 

[volcelfatcel]

side profile is copium

 

[Copeful]

side >>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front

 

[Deleted member 12270]

side profile is copium

You should look good in all angles, but front view is more important. What really matters is that you don’t have a recessed maxilla or chin

 

[Deleted member 14344]

side >>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front

sir? are u okay, sir?

 

[Baldingman1998]

side >>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front

Serious or joking?

 

[Copeful]

sir? are u okay, sir?

front doesnt mean shit
nobody ever sees you directly from the front irl
side and 3/4 = everything

 

[JosephGarrot123]

front > 3/4 > side. They are all important imo

 

[Deleted member 14344]

front doesnt mean shit
nobody ever sees you directly from the front irl
side and 3/4 = everything

no, do u think that models are engaged for their side profile?

 

[Baldingman1998]

front doesnt mean shit
nobody ever sees you directly from the front irl
side and 3/4 = everything

So you just face sideways whoever you talk to without eye contact?

 

[Haven]

title

1/2 of front if your side is good your front is good too prob

 

[loksr]

All angles matter irl/in motion but for pictures just front

 

[terrorblade]

a lot but not as much as front

 

[CursedOne]

Side is the only angle I look good and sadly side doesnt matter much. I guess its due to my browridge that makes my side profile look muuch better. Like the autist I am I try to face sideway or 3/4 whenever I talk to someone. Every mog counts guys.
There are so many guys that look shit from the site but are considered gl because of front.

 

[EasternRightWinger15]

side is good to spot failos, but front and 3/4 matter more irl

 

[aBetterMii]

All angles matter irl/in motion but for pictures just front

Id say 3/4 matters the most for pictures, selfies or not, most (~70%) models (not super models) dont typically stare down the camera, and when taking selfies and shit 3/4 shows the most depth to your face (and can hide asymetry since in pics its more noticable but asymetry irl is very hard to spot unless mega bad)

 

[volcelfatcel]

front doesnt mean shit
nobody ever sees you directly from the front irl
side and 3/4 = everything

why are you using johny depps front as your avi then

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

side >>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front

3/4>front>side

 

[loksr]

Id say 3/4 matters the most for pictures, selfies or not, most (~70%) models (not super models) dont typically stare down the camera, and when taking selfies and shit 3/4 shows the most depth to your face (and can hide asymetry since in pics its more noticable but asymetry irl is very hard to spot unless mega bad)

I'll rephrase
every angle matters for irl/in motion but front matters the most for autistic psl selfies

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Side is the only angle I look good and sadly side doesnt matter much. I guess its due to my browridge that makes my side profile look muuch better. Like the autist I am I try to face sideway or 3/4 whenever I talk to someone. Every mog counts guys.
There are so many guys that look shit from the site but are considered gl because of front.

You're a chinlet. I don't get where you get these delusions from. If you got BSSO/genio you'd ascend tbh. You're coping with "muh browridge makes me look recessed".

Not trying to be offensive. Just trying to help.

 

[TUSSELEIF]

After my jaw improved and got a bit wider and longer from front my side profile improved as well, but frontal features in general is most important.

 

[Deleted member 3828]

you can hide more failos looking directly from the front

side is more like what you look irl and your irl looks matter more

you can have a good front but low hyoid for example and you look subhuman no girl will find you attractive

 

[mulattomaxxer]

All are important, but front profile is the most important. people will spend the most time looking at your fron profile. But You need a good sideprofile to look good in motion.

Good front profile + good side profile = unmoggable from every angle.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

nobody outside of this autismhole gives a fuck about side profile

obviously if you're recessed you should still absolutely get it fixed
but 3/4 and front are far more important IRL
how often do you look at someones side profile - i never did until psl

if you look like shit from the side, its probably because you are ugly overall, so get that addressed first

 

[Deleted member 13409]

I put my side profile prominently in my dating apps and all my IG shots are 3/4 or side profile. I’m a rare case of someone with a 6+ PSL side profile and only 5ish PSL front profile. I blame bloat mostly but also asymmetry.

anyways girls like my side profile pictures and once I finally posted one on IG 3 girls who followed me messaged me replying to the story

I’m proud of my side profile but I’m a bit sheepish about my front

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

Side profile picture accounts for less than 5% of your attractiveness tbh.
Has barely no use other than gauging recession.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

nobody outside of this autismhole gives a fuck about side profile

View attachment 1283677View attachment 1283679
View attachment 1283678View attachment 1283680

obviously if you're recessed you should still absolutely get it fixed
but 3/4 and front are far more important IRL
how often do you look at someones side profile - i never did until psl

if you look like shit from the side, its probably because you are ugly overall, so get that addressed first

Massive cherrypick though. They're all incredibly forward grown aside from Brad Pitt, who is still average or slightly above.

 

[Mr.cope]

Your front actually is equal to your side
Your side profile is a “sneak peek” to your front
If your side is attractive you are most likely attractive from the front

 

[Deleted member 13476]

Massive cherrypick though. They're all incredibly forward grown aside from Brad Pitt, who is still average or slightly above.

Not really. I picked well known chads who look incredible from the front but their side profiles are meh, proves no one really cares about side profile unless it is really bad.

If your side is attractive you are most likely attractive from the front

Totally agree with this though.

 

[AtlasTH]

No one care about 100% side. Only 3/4. Do you think you are model or some shit that people will care so much about your 100% side face profile unless it's absurdly bad.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Not really. I picked well known chads who look incredible from the front but their side profiles are meh, proves no one really cares about side profile unless it is really bad.

Totally agree with this though.

Their side profiles are top tier. What tf are you on about?

 

[Deleted member 13476]

Their side profiles are top tier. What tf are you on about?

this isnt a top tier side profile, its good, but not top tier as supposed to his front profile which is top 0.000000001%
same with all the other examples i used

this is a top tier side profile
he's leaning forward yea, but barretts side profile still mogs o'prys to oblivion. but overall, o'pry mogs hard

its a similar effect with non-models. they could have a 5.5psl front profile but a 4psl side profile. or the other way around. side profile still remains pretty much irrelevant unless you're totally recessed.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

View attachment 1283838
this isnt a top tier side profile, its good, but not top tier as supposed to his front profile which is top 0.000000001%
same with all the other examples i used
View attachment 1283840
this is a top tier side profile
he's leaning forward yea, but barretts side profile still mogs o'prys to oblivion. but overall, o'pry mogs hard

its a similar effect with non-models. they could have a 5.5psl front profile but a 4psl side profile. or the other way around. side profile still remains pretty much irrelevant unless you're totally recessed.

You're actually a giga greycel. Sean O'Pry has a top 1% maxilla and forward growth. Do you even know what forward growth means?

They're tilting their head down in their bad pictures. They both have dog tier maxillas JFL. What kind of cope is that? Sean O'Pry has a 4 PSL side profile .

 

[Deleted member 13476]

You're actually a giga greycel. Sean O'Pry has a top 1% maxilla and forward growth. Do you even know what forward growth means?

View attachment 1283853
View attachment 1283854

They're tilting their head down in their bad pictures. They both have dog tier maxillas JFL. What kind of cope is that? Sean O'Pry has a 4 PSL side profile .

I didn't say O'pry had a 4PSL side profile dumbass, can you fucking read? Of course he has 1% tier forward growth, but the rest of his face is far more than top 1%, more like top 0.00001%. Can you not understand such a simple point?

And Barrett is bloated as fuck in that photo way way past his prime, really retarded example.

Fucking 6"7 deformed abused dog gets mad when anyone disagrees with him jfl, learn to have a proper discussion. No wonder you're truecel with no friends.

And greycel is such a cope tier insult, having 5K posts on this site is nothing to be proud of.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

I didn't say O'pry had a 4PSL side profile dumbass, can you fucking read? Of course he has 1% tier forward growth, but the rest of his face is far more than 1%, can you not understand such a simple point?.

And Barrett is bloated as fuck in that photo way way past his prime, really retarded example.

Fucking 6"7 deformed abused dog gets mad when anyone disagrees with him jfl, learn to have a proper discussion. No wonder you're truecel with no friends.

And greycel is such a cope tier insult, having 5K posts on this site is nothing to be proud of.

What's wrong with O'Pry's side profile? Insane forward growth and great browridge means top 1%. You posted a shitty angle and tried to make an argument with it JFL.

Both Barrett and O'Pry have top 1% profiles. I was proving a point by using a bad picture of Barrett. JFL at "past his prime" btw. He's still a Chad. Lookup his Instagram. It was just a bad picture.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

What's wrong with O'Pry's side profile? Insane forward growth and great browridge means top 1%. You posted a shitty angle and tried to make an argument with it JFL.

Both Barrett and O'Pry have top 1% profiles. I was proving a point by using a bad picture of Barrett. JFL at "past his prime" btw. He's still a Chad. Lookup his Instagram. It was just a bad picture.

For the 3rd time now, there is nothing wrong with O'Pry's side profile. It is not as good as his front profile however. If you saw only his side profile, you would not be that impressed as opposed to his front profile It's a really simple argument, you just can't understand it for some reason.
With Barrett, his side profile is far more impressive than O'pry's. This does not mean O'pry has a bad side profile. Do you get it? Because I really cannot be fucked explaining this to you any further.

And of course Barrett is still a chad, I never said he wasn't, he just isn't as chad as he used to be. You really need to learn how to interpret arguments. If you have autism I forgive you, nothing you can do about that.

Just because you criticise a certain aspect of something, does not mean that that said thing is completely flawed.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

For the 3rd time now, there is nothing wrong with O'Pry's side profile. It is not as good as his front profile however. If you saw only his side profile, you would not be that impressed as opposed to his front profile It's a really simple argument, you just can't understand it for some reason.
With Barrett, his side profile is far more impressive than O'pry's. This does not mean O'pry has a bad side profile. Do you get it? Because I really cannot be fucked explaining this to you any further.

And of course Barrett is still a chad, I never said he wasn't, he just isn't as chad as he used to be. You really need to learn how to interpret arguments. If you have autism I forgive you, nothing you can do about that.

Just because you criticise a certain aspect of something, does not mean that that said thing is completely flawed.

His side profile is still top 1%. It's top tier, which is what you tried to argue against. Your evidence was debunked and you're trying to change your initial argument.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

His side profile is still top 1%. It's top tier, which is what you tried to argue against. Your evidence was debunked and you're trying to double down on your initial argument.

Are you dumb? Are you actually retarded?

not top tier as opposed to his front profile, meaning i am comparing his side to his front
he has a negative orbital vector and his maxilla is nowhere near as well developed as barrett's for example
this doesnt mean he has a bad side profile

yOuR eViDeNcE wAs dEbUnKed
holy shit you are low iq...

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Are you dumb? Are you actually retarded?
View attachment 1283881
not top tier as opposed to his front profile, meaning i am comparing his side to his front
he has a negative orbital vector and his maxilla is nowhere near as well developed as barrett's for example
this doesnt mean he has a bad side profile

yOuR eViDeNcE wAs dEbUnKed
holy shit you are low iq...

"this isnt a top tier side profile, its good, but not top tier". You can't compared his side profile to his front as evidence of it not being top tier. Also, that's not what you meant. You're trying to change your initial argument.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

"this isnt a top tier side profile, its good, but not top tier". You can't compared his side profile to his front as evidence of it not being top tier. Also, that's not what you meant. You're trying to change your initial argument.

I clearly set the standard for top tier as a side profile like Barrett's. And you can also set the standard for top tier based on percentile. His percentile for side profile is nowhere near as high as his percentile for front. You are dumb as fuck, learn how to read an argument. I never argued that he had a bad side profile. And you have no idea what I meant, I had to explain my argument to you multiple times so you could understand it, so don't act like you do and I don't. I didn't change jack shit about my argument, I just had to reformulate the wording multiple times so you would get it.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

I clearly set the standard for top tier as a side profile like Barrett's. And you can also set the standard for top tier based on percentile. His percentile for side profile is nowhere near as high as his percentile for front. You are dumb as fuck, learn how to read an argument. I never argued that he had a bad side profile. And you have no idea what I meant, I had to explain my argument to you multiple times so you could understand it, so don't act like you do and I don't.

nobody outside of this autismhole gives a fuck about side profile

View attachment 1283677View attachment 1283679
View attachment 1283678View attachment 1283680

obviously if you're recessed you should still absolutely get it fixed
but 3/4 and front are far more important IRL
how often do you look at someones side profile - i never did until psl

if you look like shit from the side, its probably because you are ugly overall, so get that addressed first

You literally included him in a post about "nobody outside of this autismhole gives a fuck about side profile". Your original argument was trying to say his side profile wasn't top tier by including a shit picture. You're just now changing your argument.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

You literally included him in a post about "nobody outside of this autismhole gives a fuck about side profile". Your original argument was trying to say his side profile wasn't top tier by including a shit picture. You're just now changing your argument.

No, it wasn't. That was just your low IQ interpretation of it. Keep coping that you can't handle a loss.

And again, that post was to imply that his side profile is mediocre compared to his front profile, he would not be a model based off his side profile only, it's his eye area that carries him.

Let me repeat myself again. Just because you criticise a certain aspect of something, does not mean that that said thing is completely flawed. Same with comparing something. Really simple stuff dude...

Like do you actually think I was trying to say Chico had a bad side profile too? Obviously not. It's just irrelevant and unimpressive compared to his front - again, he would not be a model based off it. But you'll probably reply with some low IQ shit like "yer changeng yore argumint!21! ".

 

[Frank Jack]

No, it wasn't. That was just your low IQ interpretation of it. Keep coping that you can't handle a loss.

And again, that post was to imply that his side profile is mediocre compared to his front profile, he would not be a model based off his side profile only, it's his eye area that carries him.

Let me repeat myself again. Just because you criticise a certain aspect of something, does not mean that that said thing is completely flawed. Same with comparing something. Really simple stuff dude...

Like do you actually think I was trying to say Chico had a bad side profile too? Obviously not. It's just irrelevant and unimpressive compared to his front - again, he would not be a model based off it. But you'll probably reply with some low IQ shit like "yer changeng yore argumint!21! ".

You cooked that nigga. Also nice Avi, Margot should go back to black hair. She looked hot asf with it.

 

[Deleted member 13476]

You cooked that nigga. Also nice Avi, Margot should go back to black hair. She looked hot asf with it.

Yea bro she looked sexy as fuck, dark hair and blue eyes is the best combo on girls by far imo.

 

[Frank Jack]

Yea bro she looked sexy as fuck, dark hair and blue eyes is the best combo on girls by far imo.
View attachment 1283906

White and blue eyes is the best combo on girls imo but since very few women actually dye their hair white you rarely get to see it. But black hair and blue eyes is elite.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The key here is not having a recessesd maxilla and good jaw fwrd growth, beyond that side profile is a cope. Tho irl side profile is a lot more important.

 

[Deleted member 14264]

It is important, but not like a death sentence, if you have at least some bones in your chin. If you have a good front and 3/4, you will be alright. People know about the side profile, but do not take it in consideration as much as other views

 

[ilyess]

You should look good in all angles, but front view is more important. What really matters is that you don’t have a recessed maxilla or chin

What about a recessed browridge bro

 

[Deleted member 14344]

What about a recessed browridge bro

 

[datboijj]

you can hide more failos looking directly from the front

side is more like what you look irl and your irl looks matter more

you can have a good front but low hyoid for example and you look subhuman no girl will find you attractive

you can hide asymmetries and the wideness of your face, including facial proportions, from the side