How Rare a 7 Inch Penis ACTUALLY is (using empirical data, HIGH IQ THREAD BY A TRUE COCKOLOGIST)

[got.daim]

@got.daim

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

An erect 7-inch penis is rare, occurring in roughly 1% to 2% of men (about 1 in 100 people). Because clinical studies show the true average erect length is between 5.1 and 5.5 inches, a 7-inch measurement sits well above the statistical average.

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

 

[Mogs Me]

Niggas when u ask them how much girth they’re packing with their 7 inches

 

[buccalfatremoval]

Mirin

 

[𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫]

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

then ecuator walks in

 

[Lemic]

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

Wonderful

 

[Morgan]

Love it

 

[fraudster#1]

then ecuator walks in

tales

 

[𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫]

tales

muh gemini says otherwise

 

[got.daim]

then ecuator walks in

Self reported

Their average is closer to 5

You can never give me an empirical meta-analysis that shows this without flawed testing methodology

tales

^^

muh gemini says otherwise

Trust me, I'm a cockologist and I study cocks all day

 

[𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫]

Self reported

Their average is closer to 5

You can never give me an empirical meta-analysis that shows this without flawed testing methodology

^^

Trust me, I'm a cockologist and I study cocks all day

You're for real a cockologist?

 

[got.daim]

Tagging other cockologists
@Gengar’s Ghost @Bipolar2Cel

You're for real a cockologist?

yes.
I've been studying the structure of the penis for over a decade and I know literally everything there is to know in regards to the penis

 

[FatCatLoafing]

really I don't think it is that rare at all, maybe because I have a 7 incher and it feel normal to me. and yes I do measure correctly.

 

[gandylite.]

i feel like most people i know are packing 6, but very few i know pack 7, there’s a big gap between them

 

[DrawnyXD]

mirin nigga

 

[Princeofhatinmyself]

really I don't think it is that rare at all, maybe because I have a 7 incher and it feel normal to me. and yes I do measure correctly.

Ofcourse it feels normal to you dumbass cuz its your dick. Or ur just blinded by porn and think that everyone is packing 20cm+

 

[FatCatLoafing]

Ofcourse it feels normal to you dumbass cuz its your dick. Or ur just blinded by porn and think that everyone is packing 20cm+

So you are really telling me that there are men that have 5 inches that have sex regularly with different women and women like it??

A woman needs a 8x6 to stretch her pussy out that is the main reason why it is over for most men.

I don't even think that men that have 5 are getting play now days I think the average is like 6-7,and for the average population I think the average is closer to 6 to be honest I don't even believe anything that op said.

I feel like all of this is wrong.

 

[got.daim]

I feel like all of this is wrong.

All I hear is feelings and not reality, you can project your ego into reality, it will not alter the material of the situation

Not to mention white men have larger cocks on avg, read the study I gave

 

[andyyguns]

lets go I got 7 inches Fuck yeah

 

[_oldenburg]

Just don't believe this, I am 7 inches and my close friends are 6,6, and 7

 

[jeremyy]

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

Over if sub 7.

 

[got.daim]

Over if sub 7.

Sadly true

 

[Princeofhatinmyself]

So you are really telling me that there are men that have 5 inches that have sex regularly with different women and women like it??

A woman needs a 8x6 to stretch her pussy out that is the main reason why it is over for most men.

I don't even think that men that have 5 are getting play now days I think the average is like 6-7,and for the average population I think the average is closer to 6 to be honest I don't even believe anything that op said.

I feel like all of this is wrong.

Yk that most normal women dont like their pussies to be stretched you insolent fool, its only the whores you see on the internet. 5 is the actual average world wide and its just a fact. And btw im not saying this because I have a lil dih myself cuz i also have 7 before you go making assumptions. But the fact is that ur just blinded by porn to thinking that women need 7-10inch dick inside them to feel good when it is actually the opposite, but yeah I cant believe it either that 5 is the average but it just is

 

[FatCatLoafing]

Yk that most normal women dont like their pussies to be stretched you insolent fool, its only the whores you see on the internet. 5 is the actual average world wide and its just a fact. And btw im not saying this because I have a lil dih myself cuz i also have 7 before you go making assumptions. But the fact is that ur just blinded by porn to thinking that women need 7-10inch dick inside them to feel good when it is actually the opposite, but yeah I cant believe it either that 5 is the average but it just is

yeah but most women have never felt a 8x6 in them so how do you know they don't like to get stretched out???

 

[got.daim]

yeah but most women have never felt a 8x6 in them so how do you know they don't like to get stretched out???

Empirical data

6-7 is the Goldilocks standard

Hahahah 67

 

[Princeofhatinmyself]

yeah but most women have never felt a 8x6 in them so how do you know they don't like to get stretched out???

Because most non virgins have prob only felt 5-7 and they already know that 7 is pretty big since the vagina is not that deep, and if a womas vagina is too tight then a too big of a dick could be painful for them

 

[FatCatLoafing]

Because most non virgins have prob only felt 5-7 and they already know that 7 is pretty big since the vagina is not that deep, and if a womas vagina is too tight then a too big of a dick could be painful for them

yeah you are probably right but what if you are like me and you like the idea of fucking pawgs like this, would it be worth it to have a 9 incher with 6 inches of girth, like how the negros in porn have? I will just do pe to get there

 

[KazeMG]

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

We got mfs called themselves “cockologists” now

 

[got.daim]

We got mfs called themselves “cockologists” now

Yeah, mogger title I know

 

[KazeMG]

Yeah, mogger title I know

Fs

 

[clavicular15]

Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service

Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have

A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%

What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies

Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm

The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution

I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias

Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised

Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such

SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)

Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):

z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 − 13.12) / 1.66 ≈ 2.81

This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100

Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):

~95th percentile ≈ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)

~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)

Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail

Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45–5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)

The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)

A big penis is always good