its equivlant to being 6'3
No, most latinos countries average dick's lenght in 6.5+
Not very rare, the averages are brought down by the asians
shit
Average height is also 6โ4
its 5'9
Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service
Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have
Thank you sireThx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service
Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have
A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%
What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies
Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm
The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution
I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias
Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised
Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such
SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)
Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):
z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 โ 13.12) / 1.66 โ 2.81
This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100
Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):
~95th percentile โ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)
~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)
Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail
Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45โ5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)
The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)
Imagine thinking these studies are reliable
imagine joining 3 days ago
Thx for the mention, Dr. daim AKA cockologist at your service
Your claim regarding the average is directionally accurate, but your rates are underestimating how rare a true 7 inch erect length is under the best clinical data we have
A bone pressed length (BPEL) of 7 inches (17.78 cm) is substantially rarer than your proposed 1-2%
What I use for my standard regarding cockology is beale et al (2015) in BJU international, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician measured data -- not self reported -- from upto 15521 men across a plethora of studies
Here are some key figures from my favourite study regarding BPEL:
Mean: 13.12 cm (5.17 inch)
SD: 1.66 cm
The protocol that they used was quite professional, they had a health professional measure their phallus standardised -- pubic bone pressed to tip of glans; no fat pad inflation, no foreskin contribution
I'm definite in my belief that the average sits at a firm (no pun intended) 5.1-5.5 inch range, using empirical data and suspending my bias
Multiple independent reviews (including some later meta-analyses) coverage on roughly the same band for clinician measured phallus length in regards to BPEL when volunteer and self reported bias is minimised
Self reported numbers run routinely ~.5-1+ inches higher due to measurement error, selective volunteering, or social desirability bias, thus rendering them non reliable for our dialogue regarding such
SO... THE FUN PART!!!
How rare actually IS a 7 inch phallus?
(under the veale distribution)
Assuming that the approx normality (the standard approach used to generate the published nomograms):
z-score for 17.78 cm = (17.78 โ 13.12) / 1.66 โ 2.81
This corresponds to roughly the 99.7th percentile, so only about 0.25% of men exceed it, on the order of 1 in 400, not 1 in 50-100
Supporting percentile anchors from the same data set (and consistent secondary analyses):
~95th percentile โ 16.0 cm (6.3 inches)
~99th percentile sits around 16.7-17.0 cm (roughly 6.6-6.7 inches)
Thus 7 inches is well into the extreme upper tail
Later meta-analyses that pool more studies sometimes report slightly higher means (around 13.8-13.9 cm / ~5.45โ5.5 inches), even under those figures, 7 inches remains uncommon (roughly top 1% or rarer, depending on the exact SD)
The core conclusion does not change: 7 inches is statistically uncommon and sits well above the central bulk of the distribution (most men fall between ~4.5-5.8 inches)
