How should the sexual market be regulated?

[NT Master]

The sexual market is a market like any other. It is subject to supply and demand, market manipulation, regulation, inflation/deflation, and other economic factors. Many men and women would be more successful if they started viewing sex as a commodity.

Just like real economic markets, there are multiple different systems to manage the sexual market. Many of the different economic types have their analogs in the sexual market.

• Laissez-faire Capitalism: Absolutely no legal control on interpersonal relationships. Polygamy is legal. Prostitution is legal. Contraception is legal. Abortion is legal. No such thing as alimony or child support. Even rape is legal but it will anger people. This was essentially life during the stone age. The USA is heading back towards this system.
• Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.
• Feudalism: People don't choose their own mates and instead your parents choose your mates. For a man, income and education are far more important than looks. This is pretty much the system that India uses.
• Fascism: The government does all it can to make sure high-SMV men and women reproduce and that low-SMV men and women don't reproduce. This is to create a master race. Essentially Nazi eugenics.
• Socialism: Men and women date and hook up with who they want. But there are also government provided hookers.
• Supply-side economics: The government does all it can to aid women in the sexual market. Read here. A lot of western countries are like this.
• Demand-side economics: The government does all it can to aid men in the sexual market. Read here. Essentially Saudi Arabia without the Polygamy.
• Barter System: People skip the whole courtship and dating part. Women just sell themselves and marry any half-decent man who will pay the most for them.

If you were the dictator of your country, how would you manage and regulate the sexual economy? There are many different interest groups you have to keep in mind and you have to balance them all for what's best for society.

Personally, I would say the ideal sexual market would be one where there is no publicly available contraception or abortion. There is no child support however along with polygamy so high SMV chads are encouraged to marry as many stacies as they can. Meanwhile, the normie men and incels are kept satisfied with cheap hookers provided by the government, and later on the LTN will also receive cheap VR porn and sexbots. Only the prostitutes have access to abortion and birth control. That way, everybody wins. Chad wins because he gets to fuck all the women he could ever want. Stacy wins because she is married and has kids with a high-value man. Normie women win because they get paid to do nothing but spread their legs for normie men. Incels win because they also receive sexual gratification, future children win because their parents will have high SMVs and good genes, and society wins because low-quality people with bad genes are discouraged from reproducing. I'm not sure what economic system this would be though. It would be one with low regulations but high taxes. Sort of a hybrid system.

 

[thecel]

I propose a one-party consent system: just 1 out of 2 people have to consent for sex to count as consensual.

 

[EverythingMattersCel]

Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.

Seize the means of reproduction.

 

[Deleted member 20735]

Sex should be banned imo maybe for the next 20 years or so

 

[thecel]

Best system:

Strict restricted-access regulatory system: All sex must be authorized with “pussy passes” issued by the government. All adults are issued a fixed number of pussy passes at the beginning of every calendar year. To have sex, a sex-haver must pay up a number of pussy passes to the government, and that number depends on the SMV of the person (s)he has sex with. Fucking a subhuman may cost 1 pussy pass, and fucking a GigaChad may cost 25 pussy passes.

Sexual market equity: achieved!

 

[Prettyboy]

Laissez-fair of course. Chads should take it all, for the improvement of humankind

Subhumans, just like the proletariat in economic sense should work hard to sustain a stable society in which chads can breed all women

In return the subhumans must be given high quality copes to enjoy so they can distract themselves from sex as they will never get to experience it anyways

 

[MakinMogReturns]

I propose a one-party consent system: just 1 out of 2 people have to consent for sex to count as consensual.

JFL this was actually a high IQ joke.

 

[AscensionMan98]

The sexual market is a market like any other. It is subject to supply and demand, market manipulation, regulation, inflation/deflation, and other economic factors. Many men and women would be more successful if they started viewing sex as a commodity.

Just like real economic markets, there are multiple different systems to manage the sexual market. Many of the different economic types have their analogs in the sexual market.

• Laissez-faire Capitalism: Absolutely no legal control on interpersonal relationships. Polygamy is legal. Prostitution is legal. Contraception is legal. Abortion is legal. No such thing as alimony or child support. Even rape is legal but it will anger people. This was essentially life during the stone age. The USA is heading back towards this system.
• Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.
• Feudalism: People don't choose their own mates and instead your parents choose your mates. For a man, income and education are far more important than looks. This is pretty much the system that India uses.
• Fascism: The government does all it can to make sure high-SMV men and women reproduce and that low-SMV men and women don't reproduce. This is to create a master race. Essentially Nazi eugenics.
• Socialism: Men and women date and hook up with who they want. But there are also government provided hookers.
• Supply-side economics: The government does all it can to aid women in the sexual market. Read here. A lot of western countries are like this.
• Demand-side economics: The government does all it can to aid men in the sexual market. Read here. Essentially Saudi Arabia without the Polygamy.
• Barter System: People skip the whole courtship and dating part. Women just sell themselves and marry any half-decent man who will pay the most for them.

If you were the dictator of your country, how would you manage and regulate the sexual economy? There are many different interest groups you have to keep in mind and you have to balance them all for what's best for society.

Personally, I would say the ideal sexual market would be one where there is no publicly available contraception or abortion. There is no child support however along with polygamy so high SMV chads are encouraged to marry as many stacies as they can. Meanwhile, the normie men and incels are kept satisfied with cheap hookers provided by the government, and later on the LTN will also receive cheap VR porn and sexbots. Only the prostitutes have access to abortion and birth control. That way, everybody wins. Chad wins because he gets to fuck all the women he could ever want. Stacy wins because she is married and has kids with a high-value man. Normie women win because they get paid to do nothing but spread their legs for normie men. Incels win because they also receive sexual gratification, future children win because their parents will have high SMVs and good genes, and society wins because low-quality people with bad genes are discouraged from reproducing. I'm not sure what economic system this would be though. It would be one with low regulations but high taxes. Sort of a hybrid system.

I think a combination of several systems, including the the laissez-faire approach,socialism, and supply side and demand side principles. We need to have legalized prostitution , escorts to serve as a way to devalue the cost of pussy. We then need factors in the demand side with enforced slut shaming, pro masculinity social media influencers like Andrew Tate , and have state run ads on tv and instagram that encourage LTR while discouraging hook ups. Legalizing rape is not needed if subsidized prostitution and escorts are provided to sub 8 men. All sub 8 men should also get universal basic income that would fund the sexcapedes, as well as an allocated portion that would go to a surgery fund, and other stuff. Chads and all foids would get taxed more due to female privelege, with the most attractive people getting taxed more.This would help with funding the program and balance out the lower amount paid by the less attractive men.

Encouraging fat shaming also would devalue pussy as it reduces the competition for traditionally attractive women. A dedicated science department also would need large funding, to be able to perfect the art of CRISPR to make men and women more aesthethic in future generations, as well as have breeding facilities of chads and Stacies. So dedicated chads and Stacies make an elite generation of future kids, while in conjunction scientists continue to improve CRISPR so future newborns can improve, and potentially even change the looks of humans in the current world.They can also work on developing artificial womb technology so genetically engineered Stacies can be made with a brain structure that does not value looks as much and instead has in general low standards such that " just approach bro" ends up working.

By the way this was a well thought out, high iq thread OP

 

[SubSigma]

Just ban dating apps lol

 

[EverydayIsHell]

Just ban dating apps lol

dating apps are a great invention. they just need to be regulated

 

[AscensionMan98]

Best system:

Strict restricted-access regulatory system: All sex must be authorized with “pussy passes” issued by the government. All adults are issued a fixed number of pussy passes at the beginning of every calendar year. To have sex, a sex-haver must pay up a number of pussy passes to the government, and that number depends on the SMV of the person (s)he has sex with. Fucking a subhuman may cost 1 pussy pass, and fucking a GigaChad may cost 25 pussy passes.

Sexual market equity: achieved!

Make it so that fucking a subhuman gives them a lot of pussy pass, otherwise no incentive to use a pussy pass considering for most women they would rather attention whore then fuck. Sex isn't needed by women. Its more so drives men crazy.

 

[Deleted member 19036]

The sexual market is a market like any other. It is subject to supply and demand, market manipulation, regulation, inflation/deflation, and other economic factors. Many men and women would be more successful if they started viewing sex as a commodity.

Just like real economic markets, there are multiple different systems to manage the sexual market. Many of the different economic types have their analogs in the sexual market.

• Laissez-faire Capitalism: Absolutely no legal control on interpersonal relationships. Polygamy is legal. Prostitution is legal. Contraception is legal. Abortion is legal. No such thing as alimony or child support. Even rape is legal but it will anger people. This was essentially life during the stone age. The USA is heading back towards this system.
• Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.
• Feudalism: People don't choose their own mates and instead your parents choose your mates. For a man, income and education are far more important than looks. This is pretty much the system that India uses.
• Fascism: The government does all it can to make sure high-SMV men and women reproduce and that low-SMV men and women don't reproduce. This is to create a master race. Essentially Nazi eugenics.
• Socialism: Men and women date and hook up with who they want. But there are also government provided hookers.
• Supply-side economics: The government does all it can to aid women in the sexual market. Read here. A lot of western countries are like this.
• Demand-side economics: The government does all it can to aid men in the sexual market. Read here. Essentially Saudi Arabia without the Polygamy.
• Barter System: People skip the whole courtship and dating part. Women just sell themselves and marry any half-decent man who will pay the most for them.

If you were the dictator of your country, how would you manage and regulate the sexual economy? There are many different interest groups you have to keep in mind and you have to balance them all for what's best for society.

Personally, I would say the ideal sexual market would be one where there is no publicly available contraception or abortion. There is no child support however along with polygamy so high SMV chads are encouraged to marry as many stacies as they can. Meanwhile, the normie men and incels are kept satisfied with cheap hookers provided by the government, and later on the LTN will also receive cheap VR porn and sexbots. Only the prostitutes have access to abortion and birth control. That way, everybody wins. Chad wins because he gets to fuck all the women he could ever want. Stacy wins because she is married and has kids with a high-value man. Normie women win because they get paid to do nothing but spread their legs for normie men. Incels win because they also receive sexual gratification, future children win because their parents will have high SMVs and good genes, and society wins because low-quality people with bad genes are discouraged from reproducing. I'm not sure what economic system this would be though. It would be one with low regulations but high taxes. Sort of a hybrid system.

ER. Chaos. Blood n Flesh. Based

 

[NT Master]

Best system:

Strict restricted-access regulatory system: All sex must be authorized with “pussy passes” issued by the government. All adults are issued a fixed number of pussy passes at the beginning of every calendar year. To have sex, a sex-haver must pay up a number of pussy passes to the government, and that number depends on the SMV of the person (s)he has sex with. Fucking a subhuman may cost 1 pussy pass, and fucking a GigaChad may cost 25 pussy passes.

Sexual market equity: achieved!

The issue with this system is that it seems very hard to enforce. What's stopping people from hiding somewhere to have sex and not use a pussy pass at all? Victimless crimes are always hard to stop. And a law that can't be enforced might as well not exist.

OT: I also meant that in my OP, that there would be child support in the case of deadbeat dads. That way Chads would be forced to marry Stacies and riase children instead of leaving a lot of bastards and future criminals from single-parent households.

 

[HerpDerpson]

Just like any other market, it shouldn't be.

 

[klip11]

Any regulations that places even the least bit of restriction on women will be viewed as oppressive. If you'll notice, all of our laws and social conventions are built around benefitting the female sexual strategy.

For example, a woman can get an abortion without the fathers consent. And it is considered socially unacceptable to shame a woman or put any sort of negative connotation on her for having an abortion. She's a strong and empowered modern woman. She's a queen.

On the other hand, a man cannot opt out of child support. And a man who refuses to pay child support is seen as a dead beat, a low life, irresponsible, not a "real man". And in some cases, a man can be legally forced to pay child support for a child that's not his. Also, a man can go to jail for not paying child support. No one would ever even joke about putting a woman in jail for having an abortion.

 

[Deleted member 19036]

Any regulations that places even the least bit of restriction on women will be viewed as oppressive. If you'll notice, all of our laws and social conventions are built around benefitting the female sexual strategy.

For example, a woman can get an abortion without the fathers consent. And it is considered socially unacceptable to shame a woman or put any sort of negative connotation on her for having an abortion. She's a strong and empowered modern woman. She's a queen.

On the other hand, a man cannot opt out of child support. And a man who refuses to pay child support is seen as a dead beat, a low life, irresponsible, not a "real man". And in some cases, a man can be legally forced to pay child support for a child that's not his. Also, a man can go to jail for not paying child support. No one would ever even joke about putting a woman in jail for having an abortion.

gaysex.net

 

[thecel]

Any regulations that places even the least bit of restriction on women will be viewed as oppressive. If you'll notice, all of our laws and social conventions are built around benefitting the female sexual strategy.

For example, a woman can get an abortion without the fathers consent. And it is considered socially unacceptable to shame a woman or put any sort of negative connotation on her for having an abortion. She's a strong and empowered modern woman. She's a queen.

On the other hand, a man cannot opt out of child support. And a man who refuses to pay child support is seen as a dead beat, a low life, irresponsible, not a "real man". And in some cases, a man can be legally forced to pay child support for a child that's not his. Also, a man can go to jail for not paying child support. No one would ever even joke about putting a woman in jail for having an abortion.

 

[height]

I should be first to pick which humans i want the other humans can get the remaining ones

 

[height]

Just like any other market, it shouldn't be.

lol what

 

[klip11]

gaysex.net

I don't get it. What's that got to do with anything

 

[Deleted member 19036]

I don't get it. What's that got to do with anything

schzoo medd not qorkin

 

[HerpDerpson]

lol what

Self explanatory, no? The invisible hand of the market will regulate women and chads; while incel is regulating his blood pressure, using his hand to masturbate.

 

[JBcollector]

The sexual market is a market like any other. It is subject to supply and demand, market manipulation, regulation, inflation/deflation, and other economic factors. Many men and women would be more successful if they started viewing sex as a commodity.

Just like real economic markets, there are multiple different systems to manage the sexual market. Many of the different economic types have their analogs in the sexual market.

• Laissez-faire Capitalism: Absolutely no legal control on interpersonal relationships. Polygamy is legal. Prostitution is legal. Contraception is legal. Abortion is legal. No such thing as alimony or child support. Even rape is legal but it will anger people. This was essentially life during the stone age. The USA is heading back towards this system.
• Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.
• Feudalism: People don't choose their own mates and instead your parents choose your mates. For a man, income and education are far more important than looks. This is pretty much the system that India uses.
• Fascism: The government does all it can to make sure high-SMV men and women reproduce and that low-SMV men and women don't reproduce. This is to create a master race. Essentially Nazi eugenics.
• Socialism: Men and women date and hook up with who they want. But there are also government provided hookers.
• Supply-side economics: The government does all it can to aid women in the sexual market. Read here. A lot of western countries are like this.
• Demand-side economics: The government does all it can to aid men in the sexual market. Read here. Essentially Saudi Arabia without the Polygamy.
• Barter System: People skip the whole courtship and dating part. Women just sell themselves and marry any half-decent man who will pay the most for them.

If you were the dictator of your country, how would you manage and regulate the sexual economy? There are many different interest groups you have to keep in mind and you have to balance them all for what's best for society.

Personally, I would say the ideal sexual market would be one where there is no publicly available contraception or abortion. There is no child support however along with polygamy so high SMV chads are encouraged to marry as many stacies as they can. Meanwhile, the normie men and incels are kept satisfied with cheap hookers provided by the government, and later on the LTN will also receive cheap VR porn and sexbots. Only the prostitutes have access to abortion and birth control. That way, everybody wins. Chad wins because he gets to fuck all the women he could ever want. Stacy wins because she is married and has kids with a high-value man. Normie women win because they get paid to do nothing but spread their legs for normie men. Incels win because they also receive sexual gratification, future children win because their parents will have high SMVs and good genes, and society wins because low-quality people with bad genes are discouraged from reproducing. I'm not sure what economic system this would be though. It would be one with low regulations but high taxes. Sort of a hybrid system.

God tier post

 

[Deleted member 11126]

The sexual market is a market like any other. It is subject to supply and demand, market manipulation, regulation, inflation/deflation, and other economic factors. Many men and women would be more successful if they started viewing sex as a commodity.

Just like real economic markets, there are multiple different systems to manage the sexual market. Many of the different economic types have their analogs in the sexual market.

• Laissez-faire Capitalism: Absolutely no legal control on interpersonal relationships. Polygamy is legal. Prostitution is legal. Contraception is legal. Abortion is legal. No such thing as alimony or child support. Even rape is legal but it will anger people. This was essentially life during the stone age. The USA is heading back towards this system.
• Communism: Nobody chooses their mate. Instead, the government plays matchmaker for the entire society. Everyone is given their looksmatch and couples are supposed to love each other after they started a large family. I can't think of any real-life example of this.
• Feudalism: People don't choose their own mates and instead your parents choose your mates. For a man, income and education are far more important than looks. This is pretty much the system that India uses.
• Fascism: The government does all it can to make sure high-SMV men and women reproduce and that low-SMV men and women don't reproduce. This is to create a master race. Essentially Nazi eugenics.
• Socialism: Men and women date and hook up with who they want. But there are also government provided hookers.
• Supply-side economics: The government does all it can to aid women in the sexual market. Read here. A lot of western countries are like this.
• Demand-side economics: The government does all it can to aid men in the sexual market. Read here. Essentially Saudi Arabia without the Polygamy.
• Barter System: People skip the whole courtship and dating part. Women just sell themselves and marry any half-decent man who will pay the most for them.

If you were the dictator of your country, how would you manage and regulate the sexual economy? There are many different interest groups you have to keep in mind and you have to balance them all for what's best for society.

Personally, I would say the ideal sexual market would be one where there is no publicly available contraception or abortion. There is no child support however along with polygamy so high SMV chads are encouraged to marry as many stacies as they can. Meanwhile, the normie men and incels are kept satisfied with cheap hookers provided by the government, and later on the LTN will also receive cheap VR porn and sexbots. Only the prostitutes have access to abortion and birth control. That way, everybody wins. Chad wins because he gets to fuck all the women he could ever want. Stacy wins because she is married and has kids with a high-value man. Normie women win because they get paid to do nothing but spread their legs for normie men. Incels win because they also receive sexual gratification, future children win because their parents will have high SMVs and good genes, and society wins because low-quality people with bad genes are discouraged from reproducing. I'm not sure what economic system this would be though. It would be one with low regulations but high taxes. Sort of a hybrid system.

First by getting rid of fail safes women have like welfare for single mothers and I think child support should be severely limited. There are a few cases where a deadbeat should pay up but this idea that knocking up some random whore means paying 20% of your income per life is crazy.

That would solve half the issues then for the rest I just think public propaganda about settling down. And giving tax credits to stable nuclear families allowing mothers to get money for being stay at home ect...

 

[looksmaxxed]

completely free and based on genetics. that means zero jew input.

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Fascism. Remove foid rights + subsidise prostitution, only 1% men breed + kill females after 25

 

[Deleted member 4362]

completely free and based on genetics. that means zero jew input.

What does that involve? Humans don’t deserve autonomy

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Fascism. Remove foid rights + subsidise prostitution, only 1% men breed + kill females after 25

What does that involve? Humans don’t deserve autonomy

Does that include your mother and sister too?

 

[Deleted member 24278]

It can't be

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Does that include your mother and sister too?

Of course

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Of course

You have mommy issues