PharmaPhaggot
Hedonism final boss
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2024
- Posts
- 12,729
- Reputation
- 17,169
If you have a semi-functioning brain and came across this thread, it probably seems useless and terra-water. but its came to my attention that pretty much no greys know about this.
But i went through botb and couldnt find fuck all about it so i assume thats why due to the extreme wetness of this thread i will not spend too much time or effort into it but my intent is just to rather give a heads up. I have seen lots of retards planiing to run mid+ dose test, halo, tren and many other compounds without dutasteride and/or ru58841. Their reasoning is “muh good hair genetics”, first of all you cannot look at your dad or grandfather and have a single clue if gear will rape your hair. Because the point of steroids is with test to bring it supraphysiogical levels and with other steroids its too bring on foreign androgens. So since they have not experinced supraphysiological levels of androgenocity you cannot extrapolate their results onto your case, unless your family consists of silverback gorrilas with top 0,1% testosterone levels. NO ghk-cu will not save your skin, no accutane will not save your skin either, drugs like these do help skin but do so in different ways so they do not inhibit roids from raping your skin like theres no tommorow. Ru58841 directly target the mechanisms these androgens use as they cant enter the receptor and dutasteride stop dht, a huge contributor of this from even existing.
this study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40723308/ shows how dht will rape your skin, when we look at studies on androgens they usually compare very low concentration of dht and se ein increase of collagen, mainly type 1. or they just do it on testosterone which has a huge obvious source of fults which is the increased estrogen which we know helps skin. the linked study showed these results (e.g., 10 ng/mL: 2.03 ± 0.81% for collagen I, 8.49 ± 1.85% for collagen III). the increase in type 1 collagen very much tapered off or almost dissapeared since its not deficient tier, while type 3 collagen. And for you iqlets out there type 1 collagen is very stiff while type 3 is smoother and softer. so no you wont have good skin just because muh more collagen, but instead youll get thick hard skin, mike isratel is a good example of this.
Nasiolabial folds go crazy
it will also inhib regeneration https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6449257/
tl;dr Eat dutasteride for breakfast lunch and dinner and shower in ru58841
and dyor
But i went through botb and couldnt find fuck all about it so i assume thats why due to the extreme wetness of this thread i will not spend too much time or effort into it but my intent is just to rather give a heads up. I have seen lots of retards planiing to run mid+ dose test, halo, tren and many other compounds without dutasteride and/or ru58841. Their reasoning is “muh good hair genetics”, first of all you cannot look at your dad or grandfather and have a single clue if gear will rape your hair. Because the point of steroids is with test to bring it supraphysiogical levels and with other steroids its too bring on foreign androgens. So since they have not experinced supraphysiological levels of androgenocity you cannot extrapolate their results onto your case, unless your family consists of silverback gorrilas with top 0,1% testosterone levels. NO ghk-cu will not save your skin, no accutane will not save your skin either, drugs like these do help skin but do so in different ways so they do not inhibit roids from raping your skin like theres no tommorow. Ru58841 directly target the mechanisms these androgens use as they cant enter the receptor and dutasteride stop dht, a huge contributor of this from even existing.
this study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40723308/ shows how dht will rape your skin, when we look at studies on androgens they usually compare very low concentration of dht and se ein increase of collagen, mainly type 1. or they just do it on testosterone which has a huge obvious source of fults which is the increased estrogen which we know helps skin. the linked study showed these results (e.g., 10 ng/mL: 2.03 ± 0.81% for collagen I, 8.49 ± 1.85% for collagen III). the increase in type 1 collagen very much tapered off or almost dissapeared since its not deficient tier, while type 3 collagen. And for you iqlets out there type 1 collagen is very stiff while type 3 is smoother and softer. so no you wont have good skin just because muh more collagen, but instead youll get thick hard skin, mike isratel is a good example of this.
Nasiolabial folds go crazy
it will also inhib regeneration https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6449257/
tl;dr Eat dutasteride for breakfast lunch and dinner and shower in ru58841
and dyor