How to objectively classify phenotypes

[anthrocellogy]

Thread music


1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.


So how do we classify phenotypes?

We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)

Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid

Dani Garcia
West alpinid

Alessandro Dellisola
Litord

But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example

Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid

Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc

About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.

Website url: Humanphenotypes.net

Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.​

 

[mohito]

I'm not sure exactly why.. but i believe in the golden aryan pheno

 

[Mess]

Very interesting and well explained, the video's were very nice. Great thread OP.

 

[anthrocellogy]

I'm not sure exactly why.. but i believe in the golden aryan pheno
View attachment 4507959

hallstatt classic

 

[anthrocellogy]

Very interesting and well explained, the video's were very nice. Great thread OP.

any ideas for further threads?

 

[ssxjdgh]

Where's the part where you learn to classify phenotypes?

 

[anthrocellogy]

Where's the part where you learn to classify phenotypes?

So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)​

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.​

Look the image

 

[copester2]

Thread music


1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.


So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)

Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
View attachment 4507656


Dani Garcia
West alpinid
View attachment 4507660


Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
View attachment 4507663


But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example

Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
View attachment 4507760

Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
View attachment 4507579

About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.

Website url: Humanphenotypes.net

Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.​

nothing wont load

 

[anthrocellogy]

nothing wont load

you have to relog, org cant even work properly

 

[ssxjdgh]

Look the image
View attachment 4507989

Nothing loads

 

[anthrocellogy]

Nothing loads

you have to relog, org cant even work properly

 

[Mess]

any ideas for further threads?

Nothing comes to mind, just keep your ears peeled for anything interesting to write on.

 

[xandylooksmaxs]

Dani Garcia
West alpinid
View attachment 4507660

​

@Volksstaffel isnt this your pheno

 

[anthrocellogy]

@Volksstaffel isnt this your pheno

WA is probably the pheno with the most ammount of slayers

 

[Volksstaffel]

@Volksstaffel isnt this your pheno

Yeah it is

 

[deformed subhuman]

that song really set the mood

 

[anthrocellogy]

@Tigermoggerlol

 

[truecelaztec]

is l

Thread music


1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.


So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)

Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
View attachment 4507656


Dani Garcia
West alpinid
View attachment 4507660


Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
View attachment 4507663


But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example

Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
View attachment 4507760

Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
View attachment 4507579

About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.

Website url: Humanphenotypes.net

Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.​

Thread music


1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.


So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)

Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
View attachment 4507656


Dani Garcia
West alpinid
View attachment 4507660


Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
View attachment 4507663


But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example

Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
View attachment 4507760

Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
View attachment 4507579

About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.

Website url: Humanphenotypes.net

Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.​

I’d like to add on, STOP CLASSIFYING NIHS USING THEIR SKULLS development ≠ phenotype. any phenotype can have any type of development.
example Matt bomer, look at north atlantid and he looks almost textbook cs of his development. Look at the actual important features like Cupids bow, ears, nose shape, and eyebrow shape and u can see he’s west alp

 

[truecelaztec]

is l



I’d like to add on, STOP CLASSIFYING NIHS USING THEIR SKULLS development ≠ phenotype. any phenotype can have any type of development.
example Matt bomer, look at north atlantid and he looks almost textbook cs of his development. Look at the actual important features like Cupids bow, ears, nose shape, and eyebrow shape and u can see he’s west alp

also, i know this is pflcel OP

 

[anthrocellogy]

also, i know this is pflcel OP

nahh aint me xd

 

[sub50iqcel]

Thread music


1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.


So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)

Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
View attachment 4507656


Dani Garcia
West alpinid
View attachment 4507660


Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
View attachment 4507663


But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example

Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
View attachment 4507760

Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
View attachment 4507579

About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)

Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.

Website url: Humanphenotypes.net

Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.​

high iq

 

[sub50iqcel]

also, i know this is pflcel OP

he has an org account but no one knows it's user

 

[sub50iqcel]

Where's the part where you learn to classify phenotypes?

use your eyes retard

 

[ssxjdgh]

use your eyes retard

It's not there retard. Shit thread

 

[anthrocellogy]

It's not there retard. Shit thread

So how do we classify phenotypes?
View attachment 4507574​

people with your intellect should get exterminated