anthrocellogy
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2026
- Posts
- 117
- Reputation
- 118
Thread music
1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.
So how do we classify phenotypes?
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)
Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
Dani Garcia
West alpinid
Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example
Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)
Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.
Website url: Humanphenotypes.net
Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.
1st of all ANY phenotype can look good, its about environment/cell maturity.
So how do we classify phenotypes?
We classify phenotypes by non environmental features (look pic)
Examples
Aleksa Gavrilovic
Dinarid
Dani Garcia
West alpinid
Alessandro Dellisola
Litord
But what if they are mixed?
same steps as done above but more heavy on ancestry, last name and parents phenotype
Note: Only mixed if from different groups, Nordid and Bantuid for example
Example
Jeremy meeks
Baskid + West bambutid
Misconceptions
Strongly environmental features like skin color, eye color, hair color, fat storage, height, cephalic index, prognatism etc
About JBW
Yes, just be white is somewhat true.
On average white people are better looking and is more common than GL muds
So generally white > muds but not all whites are better looking than muds.
Only critique JBW gets is "racists" and bafoons showing pics of people like Louis allen lll and tyson beckford (1 in a billion)
Conclusion
NEVER classify phenotypes by environmental features.
Every phenotype can look good but not every phenotype has the same chances of looking good.
Website url: Humanphenotypes.net
Hope yall learned something, be open to ask questions.
Last edited:
