E
EgoisticHtn
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2025
- Posts
- 40
- Reputation
- 13
I am writing this post so you can with ease show to your annoying/clueless redpill/blupill friend that he is wrong and you are right.
So the first argument you could use is:
EXISTANCE OF THE MODELING INDUSTRY
1. Modeling agencies exist (becouse they do)
2. They only take certain people (not everyone will get an invitation for modelling)
3. Those people make big money (Gisele Bündchen made 33 million $ in 2022)
Conclusion: Good Looking people get better oportunities in life simply for looking good.
Explanation: Modeling agencies take only top percent of attractive people and pay them crazy ammounts of money simply for looking good, while normies have to struggle with normal jobs to never in 10 life times come close to those numbers. Jeremy Meek for example was a criminal and after only spending 2 years in prison got a modelling contract the moment he left prison and now has a 5 million $ net worth.
Top paid models salary 2022:
Jeremy Meeks:
The second argument i recommend:
ONLINE DATING
1. Women lie in real life to men (to defend from aggression)
2. Women dont have to do that on dating apps (no risk of making a man angry)
3. Only top 5% best looking men get swiped right by women (women only find top 5% best looking men attractive)
Conclusion: When fear-free, hypergamy takes over.
Explanation: Women evolved to lie to men in real life since telling them the truth could make them aggressive and dangerous in cavemen times, where survival was a everyday battle. On dating apps there is no risk of that happening and they calmly swipe right only on guys that their biology truly craves. This is shown by only top 5% of men getting swiped right by women, whereas men swipe right on 53% of women.
Swiping data:
And lastly, my personally made argument while I was rotting in the slave-building facility (school):
EXISTANCE OF GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE
1. Both good looking and bad looking people exist (just like there are cute and ugly cats, good dogs and bad dogs, pretty birds and ugly birds...)
2. People lean towards good stuff naturally (will you pick something that has a adjective "BAD", or would you rather pick something "GOOD")
Conclusion: Since both good looking and bad looking people exist and people logically people like good stuff more, good looking people have a easier life.
Explanation: We can all agree Good looking and bad looking humans/animals/objects exist. Since they exist and people like GOOD more, we can only conclude people like good looking humans/animals/objects becouse they look GOOD, while dislike bad looking humans/animals/objects. If good looking humans/animals/objects weren't BETTER than bad looking ones, they wouldn't be called good or bad, just different. But all of us know they arent JUST DIFFERENT.
These were more philosophical arguments, you can always use scientific arguments like "good looking people are seen as smarter and smarter", but not all people are going to believe these scientific studies. These arguments can't be dismissed like that, since if your partner doesn't believe in logic there is no point in trying to prove him anything.
This guide only when through HOW to convince, not WHEN SHOULD YOU convince. That will be determined by you (the reader), and I will maybe make another post about it.
If you do decide to share these arguments with your RedPilled/BluPilled friends, feel free to comment your results under this post.
If you have any other arguments in your mind feel free to notify me so i can make an update to this one, or you could write your own post
So the first argument you could use is:
EXISTANCE OF THE MODELING INDUSTRY
1. Modeling agencies exist (becouse they do)
2. They only take certain people (not everyone will get an invitation for modelling)
3. Those people make big money (Gisele Bündchen made 33 million $ in 2022)
Conclusion: Good Looking people get better oportunities in life simply for looking good.
Explanation: Modeling agencies take only top percent of attractive people and pay them crazy ammounts of money simply for looking good, while normies have to struggle with normal jobs to never in 10 life times come close to those numbers. Jeremy Meek for example was a criminal and after only spending 2 years in prison got a modelling contract the moment he left prison and now has a 5 million $ net worth.
Top paid models salary 2022:
Jeremy Meeks:
The second argument i recommend:
ONLINE DATING
1. Women lie in real life to men (to defend from aggression)
2. Women dont have to do that on dating apps (no risk of making a man angry)
3. Only top 5% best looking men get swiped right by women (women only find top 5% best looking men attractive)
Conclusion: When fear-free, hypergamy takes over.
Explanation: Women evolved to lie to men in real life since telling them the truth could make them aggressive and dangerous in cavemen times, where survival was a everyday battle. On dating apps there is no risk of that happening and they calmly swipe right only on guys that their biology truly craves. This is shown by only top 5% of men getting swiped right by women, whereas men swipe right on 53% of women.
Swiping data:
And lastly, my personally made argument while I was rotting in the slave-building facility (school):
EXISTANCE OF GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE
1. Both good looking and bad looking people exist (just like there are cute and ugly cats, good dogs and bad dogs, pretty birds and ugly birds...)
2. People lean towards good stuff naturally (will you pick something that has a adjective "BAD", or would you rather pick something "GOOD")
Conclusion: Since both good looking and bad looking people exist and people logically people like good stuff more, good looking people have a easier life.
Explanation: We can all agree Good looking and bad looking humans/animals/objects exist. Since they exist and people like GOOD more, we can only conclude people like good looking humans/animals/objects becouse they look GOOD, while dislike bad looking humans/animals/objects. If good looking humans/animals/objects weren't BETTER than bad looking ones, they wouldn't be called good or bad, just different. But all of us know they arent JUST DIFFERENT.
These were more philosophical arguments, you can always use scientific arguments like "good looking people are seen as smarter and smarter", but not all people are going to believe these scientific studies. These arguments can't be dismissed like that, since if your partner doesn't believe in logic there is no point in trying to prove him anything.
This guide only when through HOW to convince, not WHEN SHOULD YOU convince. That will be determined by you (the reader), and I will maybe make another post about it.
If you do decide to share these arguments with your RedPilled/BluPilled friends, feel free to comment your results under this post.
If you have any other arguments in your mind feel free to notify me so i can make an update to this one, or you could write your own post
