LiteralChud
Bronze
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2025
- Posts
- 293
- Reputation
- 119
How do you actually reserach pharmacology?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
like university orHow do you actually reserach pharmacology?
the goal is to have access to names and mechanisms of pharmaceuticals nothing related to university.like university or
igyou just research the drug of interest and start from there
well not really too much, if you would like i could listen to you about it. information helps a lot.actually a good question for once, first learn what constitutes a good study (sample sizes, randomization, conflict of interest). then you can look at the evidence and see how strong it is for something. this is too much to explain in one reply, but there is certainly a lot of academic videos on this
hierarchy of evidence is a good introduction, u can watch something like thiswell not really too much, if you would like i could listen to you about it. information helps a lot.
hierarchy of evidence is a good introduction, u can watch something like this
then from there, u can go in depth to what those words mean and what they constitue, like crinial trials, case reports and their value in a study. after you understand that and have the hierarchy in mind, u can look at studies of a particular topic or drug yourself, and make a decision
i suggest u actually do learn more about this. u will find out specific receptors targetings are often useless or meaningless if they dont have emprical evidence behind them. mechanical speculation usually leads nowherehelps a lot, my main goal is to learn about spesific names for spesific aspects of receptor's targetings and so on rather than to analyse what a name that i already know does. thank you though.
makes sense, thank you for your help.i suggest u actually do learn more about this. u will find out specific receptors targetings are often useless or meaningless if they dont have emprical evidence behind them. mechanical speculation usually leads nowhere