how to research?

LiteralChud

LiteralChud

Bronze
Joined
Apr 20, 2025
Posts
293
Reputation
119
How do you actually reserach pharmacology?
 
actually a good question for once, first learn what constitutes a good study (sample sizes, randomization, conflict of interest). then you can look at the evidence and see how strong it is for something. this is too much to explain in one reply, but there is certainly a lot of academic videos on this
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTN Baguette
actually a good question for once, first learn what constitutes a good study (sample sizes, randomization, conflict of interest). then you can look at the evidence and see how strong it is for something. this is too much to explain in one reply, but there is certainly a lot of academic videos on this
well not really too much, if you would like i could listen to you about it. information helps a lot.
 
well not really too much, if you would like i could listen to you about it. information helps a lot.
hierarchy of evidence is a good introduction, u can watch something like this



then from there, u can go in depth to what those words mean and what they constitue, like crinial trials, case reports and their value in a study. after you understand that and have the hierarchy in mind, u can look at studies of a particular topic or drug yourself, and make a decision
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiteralChud
hierarchy of evidence is a good introduction, u can watch something like this



then from there, u can go in depth to what those words mean and what they constitue, like crinial trials, case reports and their value in a study. after you understand that and have the hierarchy in mind, u can look at studies of a particular topic or drug yourself, and make a decision

helps a lot, my main goal is to learn about spesific names for spesific aspects of receptor's targetings and so on rather than to analyse what a name that i already know does. thank you though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: piec
helps a lot, my main goal is to learn about spesific names for spesific aspects of receptor's targetings and so on rather than to analyse what a name that i already know does. thank you though.
i suggest u actually do learn more about this. u will find out specific receptors targetings are often useless or meaningless if they dont have emprical evidence behind them. mechanical speculation usually leads nowhere
 
  • +1
Reactions: LiteralChud
i suggest u actually do learn more about this. u will find out specific receptors targetings are often useless or meaningless if they dont have emprical evidence behind them. mechanical speculation usually leads nowhere
makes sense, thank you for your help.
 
  • +1
Reactions: piec

Similar threads

weepmeep
Replies
3
Views
50
weepmeep
weepmeep
zascend8
Replies
0
Views
10
zascend8
zascend8
L
Replies
11
Views
35
AleksandR12
AleksandR12
pakiadam
Replies
4
Views
28
2BeamsofLight
2BeamsofLight
S
Replies
4
Views
29
truesub5--
truesub5--

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top