How to spot a dumb intellectual trying to sound smart

Klasik616

Klasik616

No normies allowed
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Posts
34,739
Reputation
76,529
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 131540, HundredManSlayer, Former Shortcel and 13 others
Solipsism
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel, enlightful, Deleted member 288890 and 5 others
This are just stealth ad hominem and strawman caricatures atp
 
  • +1
Reactions: pheenon, Deleted member 288890 and PrettyLights
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality is logical and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words.

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it.
Objectively the world is a social place where i can do anything i want thanks to my natural power :Comfy:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 131540, Deleted member 288890, g4rlic and 3 others
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality is logical and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words.

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because a lot of things happened before.
objective and subjective are linguistic placeholders not ontological absolutes natural and social are historical constructs masquerading as eternal categories the binary framework eitheror represents a cognitive limitation rather than a metaphysical insight the mind projects logical structure onto phenomenological flux then retroactively declares the map identical to the territory the phenomenological experience of freedom emerges from neural algorithms processing environmental variables while generating the illusion of uncaused agency what appears as description of external reality is always already a selfreferential narrative constructed by biological machinery that evolved to maximize reproductive fitness not to access truth the apparent coherence of language disguises the fundamental opacity of consciousness to itself the subjectobject distinction dissolves under rigorous phenomenological analysis revealing only a continuous field of sensation without inherent boundaries or properties the notion of logical reality presupposes a gods eye view unavailable to finite neural architectures trapped within their own representational schemas
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890, Prรธphet, Chungus and 2 others
Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy :cool:.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: enlightful, Former Shortcel, acm and 9 others
Objectively the world is a social place where i can do anything i want thanks to my natural power :Comfy:
Joe Biden GIF by GIPHY News

objective and subjective are linguistic placeholders not ontological absolutes natural and social are historical constructs masquerading as eternal categories the binary framework eitheror represents a cognitive limitation rather than a metaphysical insight the mind projects logical structure onto phenomenological flux then retroactively declares the map identical to the territory the phenomenological experience of freedom emerges from neural algorithms processing environmental variables while generating the illusion of uncaused agency what appears as description of external reality is always already a selfreferential narrative constructed by biological machinery that evolved to maximize reproductive fitness not to access truth the apparent coherence of language disguises the fundamental opacity of consciousness to itself the subjectobject distinction dissolves under rigorous phenomenological analysis revealing only a continuous field of sensation without inherent boundaries or properties the notion of logical reality presupposes a gods eye view unavailable to finite neural architectures trapped within their own representational schemas
Agreed, we are in a trapped in our body and mind. Truth is not external. The infinite debates we have are caused by our human limitations.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890, Prรธphet, LTNUser and 1 other person
Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy :cool:.
"From a logical standpoint, what I say is true because I'm the owner of truth, that is God".
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Former Shortcel, Deleted member 288890 and ltnbrownacnecel
crazy stat card i'm ngl bro. how do you do it ?
Bad genetic + ed. I smoke weed, ldar and try to believe that one day ill have enough money for LL, even tho i know i wont. :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890, Prรธphet, PrettyLights and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: enlightful, Deleted member 288890 and ltnbrownacnecel
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel, Deleted member 288890 and ๐š‘๐šŠ๐š›๐š›|๐šœ๐šœ๐š˜๐š—
Do we still have hopes in getting a girlfriend? Is hope real or a cope.
I mean im sure theres a 5'0 ltb somewhere on earth that would accept me as her partner, maybe even love me... Im not an incel, maybe nearcel. Im not seeking romantic relationship nor sex rn, ill see in the future but i wont give up :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and Klasik616
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and ๐š‘๐šŠ๐š›๐š›|๐šœ๐šœ๐š˜๐š—
fr, another sign is people who ramble on and on using advanced vocabulary just to get a point across that they couldโ€™ve said in one sentence. David laid is a prime example of this. every time I listen to him talk I want to kms
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890, Prรธphet and Klasik616
You are right. The question should be "How I can find her", I still haven't found the way and that's why I'm KV. There's no way to meet those girls.
Im kv too lol. And just find a nerd a lil uglier than you, she wont cheat but will def touch herself to darkromance chad, your choice :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and Klasik616
I always type in absolute truths because it should be obvious to any nitwit that there is always a nuance
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
fr, another sign is people who ramble on and on using advanced vocabulary just to get a point across that they couldโ€™ve said in one sentence. David laid is a prime example of this. every time I listen to him talk I want to kms
Most academia papers are 90% repeated words. They aren't discovering anything new, just repeating arguments from a popular author and trying to be famous like him. We don't need a lot of words better use common sense.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and carboholic
goatis does all of these but he's an exemption bc he's god
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and Klasik616
mirin iq op. make more posts like this
Most academia papers are 90% repeated words. They aren't discovering anything new, just repeating arguments from a popular author and trying to be famous like him
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and Klasik616
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
what are your energy levels like being that lean ?
Ive always been lean so id say pretty normal, i can run do pushups and go on with my day. But i have to admit that walking for a long time and socializing drain my energy like crazy, i struggle a bit with human interactions
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
mirin iq op. make more posts like this
I want to make a thread explaining why blue, red and black pill exist and how people can believe in different things despite seeing reality go against their own beliefs. It would be water for someone who has been very bluepilled before like me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: carboholic and Deleted member 288890
do a thread on spotting a smart intellectual

probably just need to read my posts and describe them tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
do it and tag me if u do bhai
I want to make a thread explaining why blue, red and black pill exist and how people can believe in different things despite seeing reality go against their own beliefs. It would be water for someone who has been very bluepilled before like me.
 
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.
Speak for yourself :lul::lul:

How to spot a dumb intellectual trying to sound smart​

 
do a thread on spotting a smart intellectual

probably just need to read my posts and describe them tbh
I agree you have good takes and you don't sound like the usual sub 90 IQ user here.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: inversions
Some people cannot get meta with anything

Thats my tell, if they can't think in a detail/systems oriented manner and act on it then they are a fraud.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel and Klasik616
also how am i even supposed to debunk this?

"He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once)."

uh erm actually i believe using the terms objective and subjective are high iq termonology :feelshah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: liberiangrimreaper and Klasik616
He thinks in black or white
So you believe in middle grounds? Lmao, the whole concept of neutrality/middlegrounds is just a cop out used by bystanders, the cynical, ones who fear thinking deeper (i.e ugly vs โ€œaverageโ€ vs attractive,โ€ politically left, vs โ€œpolitically centristโ€ vs politically right).

My opinion of course
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.
on a real note tho could u explain how phenotype correlates to appeal

I think my somalian kushtic pheno has high appeal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
also how am i even supposed to debunk this?

"He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once)."

uh erm actually i believe using the terms objective and subjective are high iq termonology :feelshah:
Bro those are academic memes, I haven't terms those terms in university ever because they don't mean anything.

If everything is objective which is what realists think, is there something that's not true? If everything is either true or false, the world is incomplete as the false state of affairs does not exist (but are possible?). If everything is subjective why are we agreeing on certain topics, is language subjective? There is knowledge when something relies only on the subject, no. This stupid debate was already closed during the modern era.
 
Last edited:
So you believe in middle grounds? Lmao, the whole concept of neutrality/middlegrounds is just a cop out used by bystanders, the cynical, ones who fear thinking deeper (i.e ugly vs โ€œaverageโ€ vs attractive,โ€ politically left, vs โ€œpolitically centristโ€ vs politically right).

My opinion of course
Dichotomies are not knowledge. Dichotomies are a clear sign of low IQ, it doesn't reveal anything. If something is X, is not Y. If something is Y, is not X. A superficial knowledge that is not based on anything, only works to talk in common sense. Dichotomies can be debunked by someone who wants to think and not simply believe. For example, men are either handsome or ugly. The dichotomy is ruined the moment you ask when one person starts becoming handsome or ugly.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
Reactions: liberiangrimreaper
Bro those are academic memes

Even left and right have more historical or philosophical value than those two shit terms

If everything is objective which is what realists think, is there something that's not true? If everything is either true or false, the world is incomplete as the false state of affairs does not exist (but are possible?). If everything is subjective why are we agreeing on certain topics, is language subjective?

This stupid debate was already closed during XIX and XX century philosophy.
How is the world incomplete(in the sense ur talking about) if the false state of affairs doesnt exist , and what is the false state of affairs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
How is the world incomplete(in the sense ur talking about) if the false state of affairs doesnt exist , and what is the false state of affairs
Because anything is either true or false. Something that is true and false can't happen at the same time. So the world is either at one state of affairs or the other. If everything is objective, 1 and 2 have to happen so both can be true. An objective reality means every being is true, in the sense they exist. But not all beings or stages of affairs exist in a certain time, so not everything is objective. Aka there are some things that exist and things that do not yet exist. -Plato idea of symploke.
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
Reactions: babymoo
A superficial knowledge that is not based on anything, only works to talk in common sense. Dichotomies can be debunked by someone who wants to think and not simply believe.
I would actually say otherwise; that the concept of middlegrounds (something can somehow be both at the same time depending on a specific situation) is actually as (or more) superficial than the way of thinking you mentioned here.

As corny as this may be, this meme format is best at describing at what Iโ€™m trying to get at (However the middle drawing would also be on the left side of the curve)

IMG 6608
The middleground/neutral concept being at the top/โ€œsurfaceโ€ of the curve. Also, Imagine that the one in the middle claimed algebra was โ€œalrightโ€ or โ€œmediumโ€ instead of him saying easy.

The meme should explain my claim enough, but if it doesnโ€™t Iโ€™ll elucidate my point later
 

Similar threads

ihateevb
Replies
9
Views
68
mohito
mohito
chudpiller
Replies
2
Views
32
_Nazareth_
_Nazareth_
Vantablack
Replies
5
Views
63
Vantablack
Vantablack
autistic_tendencies
Replies
2
Views
31
SA7
SA7
Im sorry mother
Replies
4
Views
38
Im sorry mother
Im sorry mother

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top