How to spot a dumb intellectual trying to sound smart

[Klasik616]

He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.

 

[Klasik616]

Solipsism

 

[Luquier]

This are just stealth ad hominem and strawman caricatures atp

 

[Punjabi Waffen]

He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality is logical and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words.

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because a lot of things happened before.

objective and subjective are linguistic placeholders not ontological absolutes natural and social are historical constructs masquerading as eternal categories the binary framework eitheror represents a cognitive limitation rather than a metaphysical insight the mind projects logical structure onto phenomenological flux then retroactively declares the map identical to the territory the phenomenological experience of freedom emerges from neural algorithms processing environmental variables while generating the illusion of uncaused agency what appears as description of external reality is always already a selfreferential narrative constructed by biological machinery that evolved to maximize reproductive fitness not to access truth the apparent coherence of language disguises the fundamental opacity of consciousness to itself the subjectobject distinction dissolves under rigorous phenomenological analysis revealing only a continuous field of sensation without inherent boundaries or properties the notion of logical reality presupposes a gods eye view unavailable to finite neural architectures trapped within their own representational schemas

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy .

 

[Klasik616]

Objectively the world is a social place where i can do anything i want thanks to my natural power

objective and subjective are linguistic placeholders not ontological absolutes natural and social are historical constructs masquerading as eternal categories the binary framework eitheror represents a cognitive limitation rather than a metaphysical insight the mind projects logical structure onto phenomenological flux then retroactively declares the map identical to the territory the phenomenological experience of freedom emerges from neural algorithms processing environmental variables while generating the illusion of uncaused agency what appears as description of external reality is always already a selfreferential narrative constructed by biological machinery that evolved to maximize reproductive fitness not to access truth the apparent coherence of language disguises the fundamental opacity of consciousness to itself the subjectobject distinction dissolves under rigorous phenomenological analysis revealing only a continuous field of sensation without inherent boundaries or properties the notion of logical reality presupposes a gods eye view unavailable to finite neural architectures trapped within their own representational schemas

Agreed, we are in a trapped in our body and mind. Truth is not external. The infinite debates we have are caused by our human limitations.

 

[Klasik616]

Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy .

"From a logical standpoint, what I say is true because I'm the owner of truth, that is God".

 

[PrettyLights]

Objectively the world is a social place where i can do anything i want thanks to my natural power

crazy stat card i'm ngl bro. how do you do it ?

 

[LTNUser]

Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy .

It's okay to be attracted to them as long as you are not 18+

 

[Klasik616]

Bad genetic + ed. I smoke weed, ldar and try to believe that one day ill have enough money for LL, even tho i know i wont.

Do we still have hopes in getting a girlfriend? Is hope real or a cope.

 

[Klasik616]

I mean im sure theres a 5'0 ltb somewhere on earth that would accept me as her partner, maybe even love me... Im not an incel, maybe nearcel. Im not seeking romantic relationship nor sex rn, ill see in the future but i wont give up

You are right. The question should be "How I can find her", I still haven't found the way and that's why I'm KV. There's no way to meet those girls.

 

[carboholic]

fr, another sign is people who ramble on and on using advanced vocabulary just to get a point across that they could’ve said in one sentence. David laid is a prime example of this. every time I listen to him talk I want to kms

He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.

 

[carboholic]

jfl

"From a logical standpoint, what I say is true because I'm the owner of truth, that is God"

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

I always type in absolute truths because it should be obvious to any nitwit that there is always a nuance

 

[Klasik616]

fr, another sign is people who ramble on and on using advanced vocabulary just to get a point across that they could’ve said in one sentence. David laid is a prime example of this. every time I listen to him talk I want to kms

Most academia papers are 90% repeated words. They aren't discovering anything new, just repeating arguments from a popular author and trying to be famous like him. We don't need a lot of words better use common sense.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

goatis does all of these but he's an exemption bc he's god

 

[carboholic]

mirin iq op. make more posts like this

Most academia papers are 90% repeated words. They aren't discovering anything new, just repeating arguments from a popular author and trying to be famous like him

 

[PrettyLights]

Bad genetic + ed. I smoke weed, ldar and try to believe that one day ill have enough money for LL, even tho i know i wont.

what are your energy levels like being that lean ?

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Moralfag cope im attracted to 13 year olds with deal with it buddy .

Nay, thou art not such.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Nay, thou art not such.

 

[Klasik616]

mirin iq op. make more posts like this

I want to make a thread explaining why blue, red and black pill exist and how people can believe in different things despite seeing reality go against their own beliefs. It would be water for someone who has been very bluepilled before like me.

 

[inversions]

do a thread on spotting a smart intellectual

probably just need to read my posts and describe them tbh

 

[carboholic]

do it and tag me if u do bhai

I want to make a thread explaining why blue, red and black pill exist and how people can believe in different things despite seeing reality go against their own beliefs. It would be water for someone who has been very bluepilled before like me.

 

[babymoo]

He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.

Speak for yourself

How to spot a dumb intellectual trying to sound smart​

 

[Klasik616]

Speak for yourself

How to spot a dumb intellectual trying to sound smart​

Debunk me

 

[Klasik616]

do a thread on spotting a smart intellectual

probably just need to read my posts and describe them tbh

I agree you have good takes and you don't sound like the usual sub 90 IQ user here.

 

[BR32]

Some people cannot get meta with anything

Thats my tell, if they can't think in a detail/systems oriented manner and act on it then they are a fraud.

 

[babymoo]

Debunk me
View attachment 4584910

Ive never made a claim that agrees or disagrees with what ur saying

im just saying the title is kinda ironic

 

[babymoo]

Debunk me
View attachment 4584910

also jordan is chopped and gay

 

[babymoo]

Debunk me
View attachment 4584910

also how am i even supposed to debunk this?

"He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once)."

uh erm actually i believe using the terms objective and subjective are high iq termonology

 

[liberiangrimreaper]

He thinks in black or white

So you believe in middle grounds? Lmao, the whole concept of neutrality/middlegrounds is just a cop out used by bystanders, the cynical, ones who fear thinking deeper (i.e ugly vs “average” vs attractive,” politically left, vs “politically centrist” vs politically right).

My opinion of course

 

[babymoo]

He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once).

He thinks in black or white ("Either truth exists or it doesn't exist"). He thinks reality are like math problems and doesn't realize it's his own mind having trouble.

He thinks he's describing "how the world is" instead of describing his own experience through words. What I call "God syndrome".

He thinks he has freedom to do anything he wants if he desires it, doesn't realize he's in a situation because history happened before him.

on a real note tho could u explain how phenotype correlates to appeal

I think my somalian kushtic pheno has high appeal

 

[Klasik616]

also how am i even supposed to debunk this?

"He uses the word objective / subjective. He uses the word natural / social (even if just once)."

uh erm actually i believe using the terms objective and subjective are high iq termonology

Bro those are academic memes, I haven't terms those terms in university ever because they don't mean anything.

If everything is objective which is what realists think, is there something that's not true? If everything is either true or false, the world is incomplete as the false state of affairs does not exist (but are possible?). If everything is subjective why are we agreeing on certain topics, is language subjective? There is knowledge when something relies only on the subject, no. This stupid debate was already closed during the modern era.

 

[Klasik616]

So you believe in middle grounds? Lmao, the whole concept of neutrality/middlegrounds is just a cop out used by bystanders, the cynical, ones who fear thinking deeper (i.e ugly vs “average” vs attractive,” politically left, vs “politically centrist” vs politically right).

My opinion of course

Dichotomies are not knowledge. Dichotomies are a clear sign of low IQ, it doesn't reveal anything. If something is X, is not Y. If something is Y, is not X. A superficial knowledge that is not based on anything, only works to talk in common sense. Dichotomies can be debunked by someone who wants to think and not simply believe. For example, men are either handsome or ugly. The dichotomy is ruined the moment you ask when one person starts becoming handsome or ugly.

 

[babymoo]

Bro those are academic memes

Even left and right have more historical or philosophical value than those two shit terms

If everything is objective which is what realists think, is there something that's not true? If everything is either true or false, the world is incomplete as the false state of affairs does not exist (but are possible?). If everything is subjective why are we agreeing on certain topics, is language subjective?

This stupid debate was already closed during XIX and XX century philosophy.

How is the world incomplete(in the sense ur talking about) if the false state of affairs doesnt exist , and what is the false state of affairs

 

[Klasik616]

How is the world incomplete(in the sense ur talking about) if the false state of affairs doesnt exist , and what is the false state of affairs

Because anything is either true or false. Something that is true and false can't happen at the same time. So the world is either at one state of affairs or the other. If everything is objective, 1 and 2 have to happen so both can be true. An objective reality means every being is true, in the sense they exist. But not all beings or stages of affairs exist in a certain time, so not everything is objective. Aka there are some things that exist and things that do not yet exist. -Plato idea of symploke.

 

[liberiangrimreaper]

A superficial knowledge that is not based on anything, only works to talk in common sense. Dichotomies can be debunked by someone who wants to think and not simply believe.

I would actually say otherwise; that the concept of middlegrounds (something can somehow be both at the same time depending on a specific situation) is actually as (or more) superficial than the way of thinking you mentioned here.

As corny as this may be, this meme format is best at describing at what I’m trying to get at (However the middle drawing would also be on the left side of the curve)


The middleground/neutral concept being at the top/“surface” of the curve. Also, Imagine that the one in the middle claimed algebra was “alright” or “medium” instead of him saying easy.

The meme should explain my claim enough, but if it doesn’t I’ll elucidate my point later