how to spot if post is chatgpt

pslgod69

pslgod69

iqlet
Joined
Jan 22, 2025
Posts
246
Reputation
262
Yep — spotting whether a text/thread is made by ChatGPT (or similar AI) is possible, but you have to approach it like detective work. There’s no single giveaway — it’s more about stacking clues until the probability feels high.


Here’s a structured way to analyze it:




1. Look at the style and tone


  • Overly balanced or neutral → ChatGPT often avoids extreme stances, even when the question seems opinion-based.
  • Polished grammar and spelling → Rarely makes typos (unless prompted to).
  • Over-explaining simple things → AI tends to give background info even when not asked.
  • Repetitive structure → Lists, bullet points, or parallel sentence structures appear a lot.



2. Check for “AI fingerprints”


  • Self-contained answers → Instead of referencing prior knowledge of the audience, ChatGPT explains everything from scratch.
  • Overuse of transitions → Words like however, additionally, in summary, overall, while it’s true that…
  • Hedging languageIt’s possible that…, Some sources suggest…, Generally speaking…
  • Balanced pros/cons framing → Even for questions where most humans would give a one-sided answer.



3. Look for factual quirks


  • Generic examples → AI tends to pick safe, non-controversial examples (e.g., cats, pizza, space travel).
  • “Too perfect” accuracy → Facts sound polished but sometimes outdated or subtly wrong because the AI was trained up to a certain time.
  • Lack of very recent events → If the text avoids specific references to yesterday’s news, it may be AI-generated.



4. Contextual behavior


  • Polite but impersonal → Often friendly yet emotionally flat; humor is “safe” and non-edgy.
  • Doesn’t bring in personal stories unless asked → And when it does, they’re generic and not very detailed.
  • Avoids sensitive or controversial areas → Steers back to safe territory quickly.



5. Use AI-detection tools carefully


  • Tools like GPTZero, Copyleaks AI Detector, or Hive Moderation can flag AI text, but they’re not 100% accurate — especially if the text is short, edited, or paraphrased.
  • Best for: Long, untouched AI responses.
  • Weak for: Short replies or AI text that has been human-edited.



💡 Pro tip: Humans tend to have quirks, typos, slang, and contradictions. AI tends to be smooth, symmetrical, and “safe”. If the text feels like it’s written by an over-polite Wikipedia editor with a sprinkle of TED Talk, there’s a good chance it’s ChatGPT.




If you want, I can make you a checklist that lets you score a piece of text and estimate how likely it is to be AI. That would make spotting much easier.


Do you want me to make that scoring system?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer and BigBallsLarry

Users who are viewing this thread​

  • Old Büll
Total: 1 (Looksmaxers: 1, Bluepillers: 0)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, pslgod69 and BigBallsLarry
with your help i spotted that this post is chatgpt
 
  • Love it
Reactions: pslgod69
Chatgpt gives formal word mumbo jimbo without actual substance and coherencel. To properly humanize it you have to do it manually with an NLP text library like lang chain

 
  • +1
Reactions: pslgod69 and BigBallsLarry

Similar threads

Zagro
Replies
432
Views
74K
mumbai.chad
mumbai.chad
Sloppyseconds
Replies
54
Views
15K
Kayra139
Kayra139

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top