how to tell if you have recessed infraorbitals

[sub5slayer.73]

Title

 

[Deleted member 143044]

If they're recessed then it's very likely that you will have a recession

 

[Deleted member 99272]

Title

by looking at them

 

[Bryce]

Take a picture of your side profile

If your orbital vector is negative, they are recessed

 

[KeepCopingLads]

Take a picture of your side profile

If your orbital vector is negative, they are recessed

i have non existent under eye area

 

[svarddre]

i have non existent under eye area

Same, get infras before me so I can see how they look

 

[zemult]

Touch below the eye. No bones? Recessed.

 

[Deleted member 78734]

Title

mirror

 

[Francisco_Bs]

Touch below the eye. No bones? Recessed.

The hell u talking abt, ofcourse there is bone right? If its not projected then its recessed. Correct me if im wrong

 

[Hide]

If your orbital vector is negative, then its recessed

Do you see a bone that protrudes beyond your eyeball?

Then its not recszsed

 

[zemult]

If your orbital vector is negative, then its recessed

Do you see a bone that protrudes beyond your eyeball?

Then its not recszsed

The infra bone is not supposed to protrude beyond your eyeball. If it did you would be deformed.

It's the combination of bone, fat, and skin, that should be protruding beyond your eyeball.

Common misconception

 

[Hide]

The infra bone is not supposed to protrude beyond your eyeball. If it did you would be deformed.

It's the combination of bone, fat, and skin, that should be protruding beyond your eyeball.

Common misconception

Fair point

If your orbital vector is positive but it has tear troughs, is it just the lack of fat

 

[zemult]

Fair point

If your orbital vector is positive but it has tear troughs, is it just the lack of fat

It's more likely in that case I would say. On the other hand, if one has a negative orbital vector, it's extremely likely their infraorbitals are recessed. It's very unrealistic to have completely 0 fat in that area, even if you had the worst genetics possible. There could be lack of fat sure but it shouldn't ever cause a negative orbital vector alone.

 

[sadcel]

It's more likely in that case I would say. On the other hand, if one has a negative orbital vector, it's extremely likely their infraorbitals are recessed. It's very unrealistic to have completely 0 fat in that area, even if you had the worst genetics possible. There could be lack of fat sure but it shouldn't ever cause a negative orbital vector alone.

If you were skinny during all your development years, can it explain why there is no fat in there despite the bone ?