How to weed out shitty surgeons

VampyrMaxx

VampyrMaxx

π–†π–šπ–™π–Žπ–˜π–’ 𝖆𝖙 π–Žπ–™π–˜ π–‹π–Žπ–“π–Šπ–˜π–™
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Posts
3,207
Reputation
3,695
There should be a law, that if a surgeon botches your surgery you should be compensated with double what the surgery costed in the first place.

That way we can get rid of the shitty surgeons and take them out of business.



Thoughts? Is this practical?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigBallsLarry, thecel, iRylsooZ and 5 others
yes i heard its effective
The only thing that becomes a problem are the rules and regulations.

For example, what counts as a botch? Infections become a problem. Implant placement, etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Insomnia, IBlameClavicular0 and 1 other person
@Luca_. @Orka @Lookologist003 @thecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Insomnia and Orka
@Hernan
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hernan
There should be a law, that if a surgeon botches your surgery you should be compensated with double what the surgery costed in the first place.

That way we can get rid of the shitty surgeons and take them out of business.



Thoughts? Is this practical?

doesn't affect me so yea sure
 
  • Love it
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
Even the best surgeons have botches
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Insomnia, niggacum492139 and 1 other person
Even the best surgeons have botches
Exactly and they should pay up for that.

For example let's i was going to pay 50k for a bimax and he ends up botching me. Then he should be the one that ends up paying ME 50k, IF NOT MORE.

That way surgeons are accountable, and pay for their mistakes, instead of running off with your money, yknow?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Insomnia and niggacum492139
There should be a law, that if a surgeon botches your surgery you should be compensated with double what the surgery costed in the first place.

That way we can get rid of the shitty surgeons and take them out of business.



Thoughts? Is this practical?

Seems like a decent idea but it would heavily disincentavise surgeons to do risky surgeries
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soter, VampyrMaxx and Abdullahm06
I guess you’re right to some extent. Unfortunately, not all botches are the fault of the surgeon.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soter, Abdullahm06 and VampyrMaxx
Exactly and they should pay up for that.

For example let's i was going to pay 50k for a bimax and he ends up botching me. Then he should be the one that ends up paying ME 50k, IF NOT MORE.

That way surgeons are accountable, and pay for their mistakes, instead of running off with your money, yknow?
I get what you're saying, but that's the same thing as claiming that tobacco companies should pay you if you get lung cancer.

You do stuff at your own risk, everyone should be aware of a possibility of a botch before getting a surgery.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel and VampyrMaxx
Exactly and they should pay up for that.

For example let's i was going to pay 50k for a bimax and he ends up botching me. Then he should be the one that ends up paying ME 50k, IF NOT MORE.

That way surgeons are accountable, and pay for their mistakes, instead of running off with your money, yknow?
This is already the case, but it's decided by judges and lawyers in a court.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and VampyrMaxx
I get what you're saying, but that's the same thing as claiming that tobacco companies should pay you if you get lung cancer.

You do stuff at your own risk, everyone should be aware of a possibility of a botch before getting a surgery.
Its not the same.

In one case a human is doing the destruction.

In the tobacco its a molecule.

A human should be accountable for his or her mistakes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and IBlameClavicular0
I guess you’re right to some extent. Unfortunately, not all botches are the fault of the surgeon.
Every botch is due to not following instructions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Insomnia
Its not the same.

In one case a human is doing the destruction.

In the tobacco its a molecule.

A human should be accountable for his or her mistakes.
yeah I mean I don't disagree at 100% tbh

even though no money would make up for botching me IMO, it would still get rid of all those shitty surgeons.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
Seems like a decent idea but it would heavily disincentavise surgeons to do risky surgeries
If it stops them from doing the surgery, they shouldn't have thought of the idea in the first place...
 
If it stops them from doing the surgery, they shouldn't have thought of the idea in the first place...
Yeah but this way getting a bimax that isnt super conservative will be impossible pretty much,obo,orbital decompresion,canto,lefort 2,commisureplasty,rhino will all be much harder and more expensive
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
Misplacement in bones is always the surgeons fault.

Scarring and other issues im not so sure

Basically surgeon error should be penalized, not things that are out of control
 
@BigBallsLarry
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBallsLarry
There should be a law, that if a surgeon botches your surgery you should be compensated with double what the surgery costed in the first place.

That way we can get rid of the shitty surgeons and take them out of business.



Thoughts? Is this practical?

This wouldn't work, or would atleast be very complicated.

"botches" isn't a word that is used in law, you CAN already sue a surgeon if they completely miss medical standards, make a stupid error or do a completely different surgery. But if they tell you about risks and you still agree to it, then a surgery done "well" by law standards but not going exactly your way won't hold the surgeon accountible.

No matter what law you make, cosmetic surgery is a known risk and most countries FIRST place the fault at the costumer, not the surgeon.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
This wouldn't work, or would atleast be very complicated.

"botches" isn't a word that is used in law, you CAN already sue a surgeon if they completely miss medical standards, make a stupid error or do a completely different surgery. But if they tell you about risks and you still agree to it, then a surgery done "well" by law standards but not going exactly your way won't hold the surgeon accountible.

No matter what law you make, cosmetic surgery is a known risk and most countries FIRST place the fault at the costumer, not the surgeon.
Correct, but I'm suggesting a law that distinguishes unavoidable risks vs technical deviations.

An unavoidable risk like normal swelling, minor asymmetry, and healing variations is different than technical deviations like weird bone placements, over resection of bones, etc.

It's more about surgical accuracy because not all complications are the surgeons fault.

Thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBallsLarry
This wouldn't work, or would atleast be very complicated.

"botches" isn't a word that is used in law, you CAN already sue a surgeon if they completely miss medical standards, make a stupid error or do a completely different surgery. But if they tell you about risks and you still agree to it, then a surgery done "well" by law standards but not going exactly your way won't hold the surgeon accountible.

No matter what law you make, cosmetic surgery is a known risk and most countries FIRST place the fault at the costumer, not the surgeon.
one more thing.

threads like this really freak me tf out.

How a surgeon can do such a bad mistake and still run off with your money is beyond me.

 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBallsLarry

Similar threads

Emancel
Replies
20
Views
233
Tealovingfool
Tealovingfool
v8sandweights
Replies
6
Views
70
samgrattlescouilles
samgrattlescouilles
MulletM1chas
Replies
10
Views
125
MulletM1chas
MulletM1chas
logicalpill850
Replies
10
Views
189
idnap
idnap
Parminder Singh
Replies
5
Views
128
alphamale82
alphamale82

Users who are viewing this thread

  • potzy97
Back
Top