How valid are PSL assessments at my age?

Ducan

Ducan

Bronze
Joined
Apr 22, 2026
Posts
492
Reputation
222
I'm almost 15, and I've definitely changed... It's a lot in less than a year, and I wonder... How valid are PSL evaluations at my age? Should I cling to them or just focus on my flaws? Idk.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Oryza
Always focus on ur flaws and how u can fix them and also looking at ur strongest points and making them stronger to compensate for ur flaws
 
u have like a year or two of facial development left depending on when u started puberty
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PSLgodBlackPerson
what are u even implying lmao? that im wrong :forcedsmile:?
Oh im so sorry, the 0.5-1% of facial development left is still relevant? :lul:, shit is set in stone at ages 6, 95% of your skull is done at ages 6 just for reference :lul::lul:. Only a single minor part of the mandible facilitates development throughout puberty. The maxilla is done with development at 15 for males, which it experiences little change after ages 8.
 
Oh im so sorry, the 0.5-1% of facial development left is still relevant? :lul:, shit is set in stone at ages 6, 95% of your skull is done at ages 6 just for reference :lul::lul:. Only a single minor part of the mandible facilitates development throughout puberty. The maxilla is mostly done with development at 15 for males, which it experiences little change after ages 8.
damn bro well then i guess my ramus and chin got noticably longer by some miracle from 17-18! wow i didnt know that i was so lucky to be blessed with a miracle. my radix also got much more projected, the genie mustve been working wonders for me :owo:
 
damn bro well then i guess my ramus and chin got noticably longer by some miracle from 17-18! wow i didnt know that i was so lucky to be blessed with a miracle. my radix also got much more projected, the genie mustve been working wonders for me :owo:
Soft tissue related likely or/and you're an outlier. If you're using outliers/anecdotal reports to reject a claim that's common knowledge in literature, then most research is irrelevant and wrong. This is likely an IQ problem if you're 2.5k posts using copes like ts. Especially when you engage in such terrible debating practices/reasoning skills :lul::lul:
 
Soft tissue related likely or/and you're an outlier. If you're using outliers/anecdotal reports to reject a claim that's common knowledge in literature, then most research is irrelevant and wrong. This is likely an IQ problem if you're 2.5k posts using copes like ts.
1783452640521

this is literally the graph of facial devolpment velocity, considering i was a late bloomer by about 1.5 years delay it makes sense that the development also shifted forwards for me. Hence why i refferenced that in the original post, nothing i said was wrong at all and im not some outlier its insanely common for noticeable craniofacial changes to happen past the age of 16/17 it just depends on when you started puberty and general genetics
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
8
Views
18
youraveragenormie15
youraveragenormie15
duvaalxo
Replies
2
Views
44
duvaalxo
duvaalxo
Kasonb124
Replies
11
Views
79
Kasonb124
Kasonb124
guldiz
Replies
6
Views
57
guldiz
guldiz
ezet
Replies
9
Views
48
Ihatezexuus
Ihatezexuus

Users who are viewing this thread

  • kaistillover
  • Ducan
Back
Top