How would you rate each race of chad imo opinion it goes like

[ndheightpracepill]

Chad
Tyrone
Chang
chadpreet

but it depends on what the female likes some of them like tyronee more than chad

 

[enchanted_elixir]

We need a phenotype breakdown. You can't just break it down by race. Anyone who has been on this forum for one year or has been through a decent number of threads on the looksmax section (3 months of daily reading) KNOW THIS.

What if the Chad is Ginger, North Atlantid, Nordic, Meditteranean, Slavic, Finno-Baltic-Russian, Dinarid, Southern Chinese, Northern Chinese, Japanese, Indo-Nordic, North Indid, Dravidian, etc. etc.

 

[ndheightpracepill]

We need a phenotype breakdown. You can't just break it down by race. Anyone who has been on this forum for one year and has been through a decent number of threads on the looksmax section (3 months of daily reading) KNOW THIS.

What if the Chad is Ginger, North Atlantid, Nordic, Meditteranean, Slavic, Finno-Baltic-Russian, Dinarid, Southern Chinese, Northern Chinese, Japanese, Indo-Nordic, North Indid, Dravidian, etc. etc.

nigga i been on this forum for like 3 weeks max

 

[enchanted_elixir]

nigga i been on this forum for like 3 weeks max

Explains a lot, you have more learning to do.

 

[esoterik]

We need a phenotype breakdown. You can't just break it down by race. Anyone who has been on this forum for one year and has been through a decent number of threads on the looksmax section (3 months of daily reading) KNOW THIS.

What if the Chad is Ginger, North Atlantid, Nordic, Meditteranean, Slavic, Finno-Baltic-Russian, Dinarid, Southern Chinese, Northern Chinese, Japanese, Indo-Nordic, North Indid, Dravidian, etc. etc.

meh, when u break it down to pheno's you then need to break down into sub-phenotypical facial structures of each which breaks it down even more, breaking down by race gives the clearest results

 

[enchanted_elixir]

meh, when u break it down to pheno's you then need to break down into sub-phenotypical facial structures of each which breaks it down even more, breaking down by race gives the clearest results

I would disagree. Technically any categorial system for a continuous trait like has issues with where the line can be drawn but there are massive distinctions in outcomes based on phenotype alone which cannot just be lumped into race (e.g Meditteranid vs Nordic; African American vs Nilotid; Indo-Nordic vs North Indid vs Dravidian; Silvid vs Centralid).

I would draw the line where the distinctions in outcome become minimal (e.g. Subvisions in Dinarid, or Nordic).

 

[esoterik]

I would disagree. Technically any categorial system for a continuous trait like has issues with where the line can be drawn but there are massive distinctions in outcomes based on phenotype alone which cannot just be lumped into race.

I would draw the line where the distinctions in outcome become minimal (e.g. Subvisions in Dinarid, or Nordic).

my perspective is; categorizing phenotypical facial features turns into a subjective mess far faster then race, to find attraction in a phenotype its less about the coloring and more about the features, there is some white phenotypes that are closer to other entire races then a relating white pheno

this type of process is called clinal variation and to try to categorize it is kinda like trying to rate every movie, too long of a list and yeah there might be some objectively higher rated ones, esp when alot of white/med phenos have pretty malleable pleiotropy, if u complete a epoch of race -> regional phenos -/ sub-phenotypical structure then try to go further i think its useless, it doesnt give as much value

and again it crosses that line

 

[enchanted_elixir]

my perspective is; categorizing phenotypical facial features turns into a subjective mess far faster then race, to find attraction in a phenotype its less about the coloring and more about the features, there is some white phenotypes that are closer to other entire races then a relating white pheno

this type of process is called clinal variation and to try to categorize it is kinda like trying to rate every movie, too long of a list and yeah there might be some objectively higher rated ones, esp when alot of white/med phenos have pretty malleable pleiotropy, if u complete a epoch of race -> regional phenos -/ sub-phenotypical structure then try to go further i think its useless, it doesnt give as much value

and again it crosses that line

I would like to add that phenotype includes coloring (it has to, by definition of phenotype), and coloring definitely plays a role in attraction.
Categorizations can be done, but it would be difficult and incomprehensive. Subjectively rating these things, as you said, can turn into a mess but if you did proper statistical analyses with robust categories of phenotypes, you could get a solid result.

 

[esoterik]

I would like to add that phenotype includes coloring (it has to, by definition of phenotype), and coloring definitely plays a role in attraction.
Categorizations can be done, but it would be difficult and incomprehensive. Subjectively rating these things, as you said, can turn into a mess but if you did proper statistical analyses with robust categories of phenotypes, you could get a solid result.

eh, you can get a result, it wont be as good, there isnt much documentation for sub-phenotypical features in each epoch, and tbh most of it comes down to intuition, people see alot of the same resulting phenotype from clinal variation without being able to pinpoint a actual cause/group of people

 

[enchanted_elixir]

eh, you can get a result, it wont be as good, there isnt much documentation for sub-phenotypical features in each epoch, and tbh most of it comes down to intuition, people see alot of the same resulting phenotype from clinal variation without being able to pinpoint a actual cause/group of people

I would never do sub-phenos. Waste of time.