HOW YOU WOULD GENETICALLY ALTER YOUR EYE COLOUR

holy

holy

Joined
Nov 5, 2024
Posts
590
Reputation
1,046
[this is a long-ass, unnecessary warning that says i’m a random fucker on the internet with zero legal, medical, or ethical authority, so if you take anything written here and try to implement it in a real, physical way using your own body as the test subject, then you are either an unhinged biohacker or chronically brain-fried from 3am reddit threads. this is not medical advice, not genetic advice, not safe advice. i am not a gene therapist, not a doctor, not a scientist in your lab. i am a random nigga on the internet. i don’t condone you doing any of the following, and if you do, then fuck it. may the CRISPR gods guide your mitochondria.]

first, understand that eye color is dictated by melanin concentration in the iris, not by some single toggle gene that switches you from brown to blue. the iris stroma is what gives structural coloration, and the underlying epithelium usually remains dark regardless of your external eye tone. brown eyes have high eumelanin deposition, primarily in the anterior border layer of the iris, while blue eyes have minimal melanin, meaning the Tyndall scattering effect becomes dominant, creating that light-blue appearance, similar to how the sky looks blue despite being transparent. you’re not changing pigments like you do in hair dye. you’re basically manipulating gene expression pathways, transcription factors, and developmental signaling cascades.

the major genes involved in eye color determination include OCA2 (oculocutaneous albinism II), which encodes a P protein involved in melanin synthesis within melanosomes, and HERC2, a gene that doesn’t directly code eye color but contains regulatory elements that control OCA2 expression via an intronic enhancer called rs12913832. this specific SNP is the power player here. people with blue eyes usually have the AA genotype at rs12913832, which dramatically reduces OCA2 transcription, resulting in lower melanin production in the iris and hence a blue color. on top of this, you’ve got SLC24A4, TYR, TYRP1, SLC45A2, and IRF4, all of which either regulate tyrosinase activity (melanin’s catalytic gatekeeper) or influence melanocyte function.

to genetically alter your eye color, you’d have to choose between three broad approaches: germline editing (before birth), somatic editing (targeted gene therapy), or pigment manipulation (non-genetic, enzyme-blocking or chemical means, which we're skipping here). germline editing is sci-fi as fuck for humans right now and illegal in basically every country unless you live in a cave with a DIY PCR lab and no morals. we’re focusing on somatic gene editing, meaning targeting your iris melanocytes in your current adult self without affecting the rest of your body’s pigmentation.

first step is mapping your current genotype using full genomic sequencing. you’d want to know if you already carry partially hypomorphic alleles at OCA2, TYR, or HERC2. if you’re homozygous for the dominant brown-eyed alleles (GG at rs12913832), then you’ll need to downregulate or disable enhancer activity at that locus to mimic the blue-eyed phenotype.

the vector of delivery matters: adeno-associated virus (AAV) is the current gold standard for ophthalmological gene therapy because it’s relatively low immunogenic, can transfect non-dividing cells like those in the iris, and has precedent in FDA-approved retinal therapies like Luxturna. however, AAV has a cargo size limit (~4.7kb), so you’d need to optimize your payload: likely a CRISPR-Cas9 system using SaCas9 (Staphylococcus aureus-derived, smaller than SpCas9) to fit inside one AAV capsid. you’d need a guide RNA targeting the HERC2 intron near rs12913832, and either induce a frameshift, deletion, or knock-in a repressive epigenetic switch like KRAB-dCas9 to silence that enhancer.

the actual injection would need to be periocular or intracameral (inside the anterior chamber), ideally directed toward the stroma where melanocytes reside. you’d need a tissue-specific promoter to avoid off-target expression, perhaps using a tyrosinase promoter so expression is limited to melanogenic cells.

post-transduction, you’ll be waiting for melanocytes to turn over and remodel melanin production. melanocytes are relatively quiescent, so visible change might take months, and even then the alteration may not be uniform. partial heterochromia (two-tone iris) is a likely outcome unless delivery is symmetrical and saturation is high. immune response is a non-zero risk, especially if the Cas protein is recognized as foreign or if too many iris cells undergo apoptosis.
side effects would be more than cosmetic. melanin in the iris protects against UV damage. blue eyes are more photosensitive, more prone to glare, and at higher risk for uveal melanoma, especially in high UV zones. if you artificially depigment your iris, you could fuck up its light-filtering capacity. also, there's no clear off-switch. you alter the enhancer, you’re stuck unless you design a reversibility loop, like dCas9 fused to a light-inducible epigenetic activator, which requires even more viral load and optical stimulation protocols.

a more precise, theoretical method would be to use CRISPRa (activation) or CRISPRi (interference) with a dead Cas9 fused to either VP64 or KRAB, respectively. this would allow you to epigenetically modulate gene expression without cutting the genome, which avoids double-strand break toxicity. you'd insert a repressor cassette via AAV to continuously suppress OCA2 in iris melanocytes. you’d still need a strong, tightly-controlled, cell-specific promoter to make sure you don’t silence OCA2 in skin or retinal pigmented epithelium unless you want patchy vitiligo or retinal degeneration as a side quest.

if you want to go full batshit rogue, you could attempt non-viral delivery via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) with mRNA payloads that code for the CRISPR machinery and guide RNAs. this approach avoids viral immunity and insertional mutagenesis but has extremely low transfection efficiency in non-dividing cells like those in the iris. you’d need electroporation, microinjection, or pressure-mediated delivery like gene gun or sonoporation, which would realistically blind you unless you had a lab built into your retina and hands steady enough to suture nanometers.

an even more complex hack would involve RNA base editors or prime editors to precisely rewire rs12913832 from GG to AA without breaking the DNA strand. this would allow eye color change with pinpoint precision and minimal damage, but delivery and efficiency are absolute shit in 2025. no clinically approved prime editor delivery exists for ocular use yet. in rats, maybe. in humans? eh... not unless you're the CEO of a synthetic biology startup and already have gene therapy trials running through your fucking eyelids lmfao

if you somehow manage to pull this off without turning your eyeball into a burning cauliflower, the color change won’t be instant. melanin doesn’t evaporate overnight. you’d have to wait for gradual pigment degradation and replacement cycles, which vary by individual. some people report changes over 6–12 months in off-label iris laser depigmentation, but genetic modulation would take longer or shorter depending on melanogenic turnover and transgene saturation.

and last, you'd need a fucking gene expression monitoring plan. qPCR, immunofluorescence staining, western blot for P-protein levels, and maybe single-cell RNAseq if you're really out here like that. otherwise, you’re flying blind, literally. you'd need to isolate iris cells from aqueous humor aspirates and verify transduction efficiency before claiming success.

alright, i'm done. again, if you're weren't reading, to genetically alter your eye color, you'd do it by:

1. sequencing your genome to identify which alleles you carry at HERC2, OCA2, etc.
2. designing a CRISPR-Cas9 (or CRISPRi) system with a guide RNA targeting rs12913832
3. packaging this system into an AAV vector under an iris-melanocyte specific promoter
4. injecting this into the anterior chamber or stroma with surgical-level precision
5. managing post-injection inflammation, immunogenicity, and pigment degradation
6. monitoring melanocyte expression shifts via molecular assays
7. waiting months for change, and praying you didn’t fry your light perception in the process

lmfao what's funny is that that’s still safer than the dumbass laser depigmentation some people pay $10k for in south america where they just burn the top melanin layer off and hope the scarring doesn’t make your eye look like a possessed marble.

now go drink some water.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: davinci, Snoofy, Hernan and 4 others
High IQ, I'm too tired to read allat. :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Randomized Shame and holy
[this is a long-ass, unnecessary warning that says i’m a random fucker on the internet with zero legal, medical, or ethical authority, so if you take anything written here and try to implement it in a real, physical way using your own body as the test subject, then you are either an unhinged biohacker or chronically brain-fried from 3am reddit threads. this is not medical advice, not genetic advice, not safe advice. i am not a gene therapist, not a doctor, not a scientist in your lab. i am a random nigga on the internet. i don’t condone you doing any of the following, and if you do, then fuck it. may the CRISPR gods guide your mitochondria.]

first, understand that eye color is dictated by melanin concentration in the iris, not by some single toggle gene that switches you from brown to blue. the iris stroma is what gives structural coloration, and the underlying epithelium usually remains dark regardless of your external eye tone. brown eyes have high eumelanin deposition, primarily in the anterior border layer of the iris, while blue eyes have minimal melanin, meaning the Tyndall scattering effect becomes dominant, creating that light-blue appearance, similar to how the sky looks blue despite being transparent. you’re not changing pigments like you do in hair dye. you’re basically manipulating gene expression pathways, transcription factors, and developmental signaling cascades.

the major genes involved in eye color determination include OCA2 (oculocutaneous albinism II), which encodes a P protein involved in melanin synthesis within melanosomes, and HERC2, a gene that doesn’t directly code eye color but contains regulatory elements that control OCA2 expression via an intronic enhancer called rs12913832. this specific SNP is the power player here. people with blue eyes usually have the AA genotype at rs12913832, which dramatically reduces OCA2 transcription, resulting in lower melanin production in the iris and hence a blue color. on top of this, you’ve got SLC24A4, TYR, TYRP1, SLC45A2, and IRF4, all of which either regulate tyrosinase activity (melanin’s catalytic gatekeeper) or influence melanocyte function.

to genetically alter your eye color, you’d have to choose between three broad approaches: germline editing (before birth), somatic editing (targeted gene therapy), or pigment manipulation (non-genetic, enzyme-blocking or chemical means, which we're skipping here). germline editing is sci-fi as fuck for humans right now and illegal in basically every country unless you live in a cave with a DIY PCR lab and no morals. we’re focusing on somatic gene editing, meaning targeting your iris melanocytes in your current adult self without affecting the rest of your body’s pigmentation.

first step is mapping your current genotype using full genomic sequencing. you’d want to know if you already carry partially hypomorphic alleles at OCA2, TYR, or HERC2. if you’re homozygous for the dominant brown-eyed alleles (GG at rs12913832), then you’ll need to downregulate or disable enhancer activity at that locus to mimic the blue-eyed phenotype.

the vector of delivery matters: adeno-associated virus (AAV) is the current gold standard for ophthalmological gene therapy because it’s relatively low immunogenic, can transfect non-dividing cells like those in the iris, and has precedent in FDA-approved retinal therapies like Luxturna. however, AAV has a cargo size limit (~4.7kb), so you’d need to optimize your payload: likely a CRISPR-Cas9 system using SaCas9 (Staphylococcus aureus-derived, smaller than SpCas9) to fit inside one AAV capsid. you’d need a guide RNA targeting the HERC2 intron near rs12913832, and either induce a frameshift, deletion, or knock-in a repressive epigenetic switch like KRAB-dCas9 to silence that enhancer.

the actual injection would need to be periocular or intracameral (inside the anterior chamber), ideally directed toward the stroma where melanocytes reside. you’d need a tissue-specific promoter to avoid off-target expression, perhaps using a tyrosinase promoter so expression is limited to melanogenic cells.

post-transduction, you’ll be waiting for melanocytes to turn over and remodel melanin production. melanocytes are relatively quiescent, so visible change might take months, and even then the alteration may not be uniform. partial heterochromia (two-tone iris) is a likely outcome unless delivery is symmetrical and saturation is high. immune response is a non-zero risk, especially if the Cas protein is recognized as foreign or if too many iris cells undergo apoptosis.
side effects would be more than cosmetic. melanin in the iris protects against UV damage. blue eyes are more photosensitive, more prone to glare, and at higher risk for uveal melanoma, especially in high UV zones. if you artificially depigment your iris, you could fuck up its light-filtering capacity. also, there's no clear off-switch. you alter the enhancer, you’re stuck unless you design a reversibility loop, like dCas9 fused to a light-inducible epigenetic activator, which requires even more viral load and optical stimulation protocols.

a more precise, theoretical method would be to use CRISPRa (activation) or CRISPRi (interference) with a dead Cas9 fused to either VP64 or KRAB, respectively. this would allow you to epigenetically modulate gene expression without cutting the genome, which avoids double-strand break toxicity. you'd insert a repressor cassette via AAV to continuously suppress OCA2 in iris melanocytes. you’d still need a strong, tightly-controlled, cell-specific promoter to make sure you don’t silence OCA2 in skin or retinal pigmented epithelium unless you want patchy vitiligo or retinal degeneration as a side quest.

if you want to go full batshit rogue, you could attempt non-viral delivery via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) with mRNA payloads that code for the CRISPR machinery and guide RNAs. this approach avoids viral immunity and insertional mutagenesis but has extremely low transfection efficiency in non-dividing cells like those in the iris. you’d need electroporation, microinjection, or pressure-mediated delivery like gene gun or sonoporation, which would realistically blind you unless you had a lab built into your retina and hands steady enough to suture nanometers.

an even more complex hack would involve RNA base editors or prime editors to precisely rewire rs12913832 from GG to AA without breaking the DNA strand. this would allow eye color change with pinpoint precision and minimal damage, but delivery and efficiency are absolute shit in 2025. no clinically approved prime editor delivery exists for ocular use yet. in rats, maybe. in humans? eh... not unless you're the CEO of a synthetic biology startup and already have gene therapy trials running through your fucking eyelids lmfao

if you somehow manage to pull this off without turning your eyeball into a burning cauliflower, the color change won’t be instant. melanin doesn’t evaporate overnight. you’d have to wait for gradual pigment degradation and replacement cycles, which vary by individual. some people report changes over 6–12 months in off-label iris laser depigmentation, but genetic modulation would take longer or shorter depending on melanogenic turnover and transgene saturation.

and last, you'd need a fucking gene expression monitoring plan. qPCR, immunofluorescence staining, western blot for P-protein levels, and maybe single-cell RNAseq if you're really out here like that. otherwise, you’re flying blind, literally. you'd need to isolate iris cells from aqueous humor aspirates and verify transduction efficiency before claiming success.

alright, i'm done. again, if you're weren't reading, to genetically alter your eye color, you'd do it by:

1. sequencing your genome to identify which alleles you carry at HERC2, OCA2, etc.
2. designing a CRISPR-Cas9 (or CRISPRi) system with a guide RNA targeting rs12913832
3. packaging this system into an AAV vector under an iris-melanocyte specific promoter
4. injecting this into the anterior chamber or stroma with surgical-level precision
5. managing post-injection inflammation, immunogenicity, and pigment degradation
6. monitoring melanocyte expression shifts via molecular assays
7. waiting months for change, and praying you didn’t fry your light perception in the process

lmfao what's funny is that that’s still safer than the dumbass laser depigmentation some people pay $10k for in south america where they just burn the top melanin layer off and hope the scarring doesn’t make your eye look like a possessed marble.

now go drink some water.
no one will get gen therapy maybe in 2040
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd
Mental masturbation just get eyecos
 
  • +1
Reactions: Amphisbaena and WrothEnd
that’s like telling someone who wants abs to just wear a shirt with abs printed on it. shut the fuck up.
not the same thing retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: Amphisbaena
[this is a long-ass, unnecessary warning that says i’m a random fucker on the internet with zero legal, medical, or ethical authority, so if you take anything written here and try to implement it in a real, physical way using your own body as the test subject, then you are either an unhinged biohacker or chronically brain-fried from 3am reddit threads. this is not medical advice, not genetic advice, not safe advice. i am not a gene therapist, not a doctor, not a scientist in your lab. i am a random nigga on the internet. i don’t condone you doing any of the following, and if you do, then fuck it. may the CRISPR gods guide your mitochondria.]
Imagine some nga actually does this, fails and sues you, you ain't winning the court with this shit:lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Germanic
that’s like telling someone who wants abs to just wear a shirt with abs printed on it. shut the fuck up.
you can fraud all day with contacts except for when you sleep, what are you on about? all that work for a 30$ per month fix
*im not saying necessarily saying that this is a bad topic, but the guy you replied to its right*
 
Last edited:
you can fraud all day with contacts except for when you sleep, what are you on about? all that work for a 30$ per month fix

contacts don’t change light absorption, don’t scatter light the same way, don’t show up real in natural lighting, shift during eye movement, dry out, can’t be worn long-term without risk, and don’t hold under scrutiny + they’re cosmetic and not physiological.

cope vs cellular change. not the same league lmfao
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd
what? what is the point of this thread, genetically changing your eye color is like building a world class security system for a cardboard box, lasers do fine with melanin already, the only reason one would, is better light scattering (ligher bluer) eyes but there is no point in that either
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: holy and Randomized Shame
contacts don’t change light absorption, don’t scatter light the same way, don’t show up real in natural lighting, shift during eye movement, dry out, can’t be worn long-term without risk, and don’t hold under scrutiny + they’re cosmetic and not physiological.

cope vs cellular change. not the same league lmfao
yea but also you dont risk losing your sight so i'll call it a win over all your topic
 
  • +1
Reactions: holy
what? what is the point of this thread, genetically changing your eye color is like building a world class security system for a cardboard box, lasers do fine with melanin already, the only reason one would, is better light scattering (ligher bluer) eyes but there is no point in that either
holy shit u guys just say anything
 
holy shit u guys just say anything
me just saying anything????? you just made a thread with the biggest mental masturbation lol, so big that it wont even be commercially available until we are old :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd
tbh im upvoting this thread for the facts but you'd have to be the biggest schizo to risk losing your sight for eye color change WHICH COULD EVEN END UP BEING A TRASH COLOR, im not even joking if you are even thinking about doing that i think you should leave this forum for good
 
  • +1
Reactions: Randomized Shame and holy
I wrote a guide to sunscreen (on a different site, not on here) and during that process I had looked into the effects of tanning and how melanin, tyrosinase, melanocytes, and so on plays a role in that. It's actually interesting to think about how all of that also plays a role into eye color; I never really thought hard about it until I read this thread. (As in my understanding of it is limited but I was still able to follow a decent amount of your thread.)

I am curious about the long term effects of something like this would be, specifically on an immune level. You mentioned potential risk but I am interested in if there's anything pre-existing we could look at related to the Cas protein being persistent inside of someone. I'm not educated in that kind of stuff so I'm not sure how I would look up something like that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
Nice thread, very smart
 
  • +1
Reactions: holy
I am curious about the long term effects of something like this would be, specifically on an immune level. You mentioned potential risk but I am interested in if there's anything pre-existing we could look at related to the Cas protein being persistent inside of someone. I'm not educated in that kind of stuff so I'm not sure how I would look up something like that.

first off, respect for not talking out your ass. most people love to throw opinions around without even a surface-level grasp of things like tyrosinase pathways or melanosome biogenesis.

and yeah, it's wild how similar the pathways are between skin pigmentation and eye color. well, kind off. except in the iris. it's less about tanning response and more about fixed developmental gene expression patterns laid down in early life.

now to your actual question about the immune side. Cas9 (especially from Streptococcus pyogenes, aka SpCas9) is bacterial in origin. your immune system can absolutely recognize it as foreign. in fact, a decent chunk of the population already has pre-existing adaptive immunity to Cas9 because S. pyogenes is a common bacterium people are exposed to. this means T-cells can be primed against Cas9 even before you start gene editing, which brings up two major issues:

1. immune rejection of transfected cells. if you deliver Cas9 into iris melanocytes and those cells start expressing it, your immune system might target and kill them off, causing local inflammation, iris cell death, or even autoimmune-like responses. in an organ like the eye, which is partially immune-privileged, this can still be a problem depending on delivery volume and immune sensitivity.

2. neutralizing future edits. if your immune system flags Cas9 after one round of editing, you may not be able to use it again. your body will remember and neutralize future Cas9 doses, which means reversibility or updates (ltoggling expression or correcting mistakes) gets way more complicated.

on whether Cas9 persists, it really just depends on how you deliver it.

if you’re using a plasmid or viral vector (like AAV), expression can be long-lasting. sometimes months. that’s good if you want stable expression of a regulatory construct, bad if you want short-term editing and peace afterward. ideally, you'd use Cas9 as a transient system. meaning you deliver it as an mRNA or RNP complex (ribonucleoprotein: Cas9 protein + guide RNA) directly into the cells, it does its job, then degrades within a few days. this massively reduces immune risk and off-target effects, but getting RNPs into non-dividing cells like iris melanocytes is a massive bottleneck right now. viral vectors are just more efficient, even if really fucking messy.

some existing studies have tracked immune reactions to Cas9 in mouse and primate models, and in many of them, immune infiltration, inflammation, and loss of edited cells are reported.

in humans, this is one reason why gene editing therapies right now mostly go for ex vivo (edit the cells outside the body, reinsert them) or immune-privileged zones (the eye or brain). even then, safety protocols are strict.

what’s being developed to get around this:

- Cas9 orthologs from less common bacteria (like SaCas9, Cpf1/Cas12a, or hypermodified Cas enzymes) to dodge immune recognition
- short-lived expression systems (self-deleting CRISPR systems using suicide switches or self-cleaving ribozymes)
- stealth delivery tech (lipid nanoparticles with PEGylation to hide from the immune system)

persistent Cas expression is immunogenic unless you design around it. immune response isn’t guaranteed, but it’s a serious enough risk that it could tank the whole edit lol. and in a place like the eye, even minor inflammation can have disproportionate consequences. corneal clouding, iris scarring, photophobia, glaucoma. I promise, that shit is NOT worth brushing off.

TL;DR look into immune responses to SpCas9, AAV capsids, and gene therapy trials in ocular diseases for more pre-existing data. keywords to search are: “Cas9 immunogenicity,” “AAV immune response,” “ocular gene therapy inflammation,” and “immune-privileged site gene editing.” you’ll find some real research there.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Randomized Shame

Users who are viewing this thread

  • lemonaki
  • arthwoor
  • Senoxe
  • SubInfinityCreature
Back
Top