HT (Hot Take): If you actively go out of your way to call another man ugly, you are publicly announcing your specific taste in men

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

To make a value judgment about an object's aesthetic appeal, you must possess an internal, evaluative framework for that specific category of objects.

E.g., If I have absolutely zero sexual or romantic interest in a category, I do not formulate detailed standards for what constitutes a high-quality or low-quality version of it. I do not look at a concrete driveway and rank its sexiness because I do not want to fuck the driveway.

If you look at another man and declare him ugly, you are comparing him to your internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. You have a baseline. You have a type. If I were to provide another comparison for you to understand, you would be basically grading the paper, which means you are enrolled in the class.

If you're not insecure, you do not have to do this, so what I'm saying does not apply to you. This is only applicable to insecure people.

If you can explain how, for example, some male actor is a "mid 5/10," you cannot get offended if you're asked why you have a fully developed grading rubric for male facial symmetry in your brain.

"No, bro, I am just being objective..."

Yeah, sure you are, you absolute retard. You just happen to have a highly specific, deeply researched opinion on another man's jawline, skin texture, and shoulder-to-hip ratio.

You are basically telling everyone exactly what kind of guy would make you get on your knees if you actually had the spine to admit it.

 

[catboy09]

Water

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

Water

Apparently not for the large majority of users here.

 

[prolarper]

What is this cope

 

[catboy09]

Apparently not for the large majority of users here.

Anyone who does that is mostly just projecting THIER hatered onto others

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

What is this cope

Any coherent counterargument or are you currently seething?

 

[yushmaxx]

To make a value judgment about an object's aesthetic appeal, you must possess an internal, evaluative framework for that specific category of objects.

E.g., If I have absolutely zero sexual or romantic interest in a category, I do not formulate detailed standards for what constitutes a high-quality or low-quality version of it. I do not look at a concrete driveway and rank its sexiness because I do not want to fuck the driveway.

If you look at another man and declare him ugly, you are comparing him to your internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. You have a baseline. You have a type. If I were to provide another comparison for you to understand, you would be basically grading the paper, which means you are enrolled in the class.

If you're not insecure, you do not have to do this, so what I'm saying does not apply to you. This is only applicable to insecure people.

If you can explain how, for example, some male actor is a "mid 5/10," you cannot get offended if you're asked why you have a fully developed grading rubric for male facial symmetry in your brain.



Yeah, sure you are, you absolute retard. You just happen to have a highly specific, deeply researched opinion on another man's jawline, skin texture, and shoulder-to-hip ratio.

You are basically telling everyone exactly what kind of guy would make you get on your knees if you actually had the spine to admit it.

EVERYONE has a fully developed rubric for what men are attractive or not

its only if you vocalize it or not

dont be a pussy and call people ugly

 

[prolarper]

Any coherent counterargument or are you currently seething?

No one cares if it’s gay, if ur ugly ur ugly

 

[cattboy]

To make a value judgment about an object's aesthetic appeal, you must possess an internal, evaluative framework for that specific category of objects.

E.g., If I have absolutely zero sexual or romantic interest in a category, I do not formulate detailed standards for what constitutes a high-quality or low-quality version of it. I do not look at a concrete driveway and rank its sexiness because I do not want to fuck the driveway.

If you look at another man and declare him ugly, you are comparing him to your internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. You have a baseline. You have a type. If I were to provide another comparison for you to understand, you would be basically grading the paper, which means you are enrolled in the class.

If you're not insecure, you do not have to do this, so what I'm saying does not apply to you. This is only applicable to insecure people.

If you can explain how, for example, some male actor is a "mid 5/10," you cannot get offended if you're asked why you have a fully developed grading rubric for male facial symmetry in your brain.



Yeah, sure you are, you absolute retard. You just happen to have a highly specific, deeply researched opinion on another man's jawline, skin texture, and shoulder-to-hip ratio.

You are basically telling everyone exactly what kind of guy would make you get on your knees if you actually had the spine to admit it.

i agree

i only rate or do an analysis if the person wants me to

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

EVERYONE has a fully developed rubric for what men are attractive or not

its only if you vocalize it or not

dont be a pussy and call people ugly

No, everyone does absolutely not have a secret, fully developed rubric for male attractiveness. This is a hilarious projection fallacy. Stop normalizing your own closeted behavior.

I do not walk around with a silent, active spreadsheet in my head ranking the physical beauty of different species of beetles because I have zero desire to mate with beetles.

If you are constantly, silently grading other men's bone structures and facial symmetry, you have an active sexual interest in them.

 

[Punjabi Waffen]

lol retard cant call people ugly in 2026

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

No one cares if it’s gay, if ur ugly ur ugly

Then you are comparing that person to your internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. You have a baseline. You have a type.

 

[ICXCLuvr]

He’s so obv right

 

[prolarper]

Then you are comparing that person to your internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. You have a baseline. You have a type.

So what, you’re still ugly

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

lol retard cant call people ugly in 2026

Can't grasp the fact that in order for you to call someone ugly that you have an internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like? That's pretty gay, dude.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

So what, you’re still ugly

So you conceded to having a type in men? That's pretty gay.

 

[Punjabi Waffen]

Can't grasp the fact that in order for you to call someone ugly that you have an internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like? That's pretty gay, dude.

No its reality, if one guy is ugly hes ugly

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

No its reality, if one guy is ugly hes ugly

See? You're stating he's ugly because you have an internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. That's a type in men, which gay. That's gay.

 

[prolarper]

So you conceded to having a type in men? That's pretty gay.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

View attachment 5295170

You just conceded that you're gay. You do realize that, right?

 

[yushmaxx]

No, everyone does absolutely not have a secret, fully developed rubric for male attractiveness. This is a hilarious projection fallacy. Stop normalizing your own closeted behavior.

I do not walk around with a silent, active spreadsheet in my head ranking the physical beauty of different species of beetles because I have zero desire to mate with beetles.

If you are constantly, silently grading other men's bone structures and facial symmetry, you have an active sexual interest in them.

i can call someone ugly without analyzing their face

also, you have a rubric for what features are attractive or not, its just that its subconscious

how else would you be able to say if a guy is attractive or not

quick question for you:

is this guy attractive?

 

[prolarper]

You just conceded that you're gay. You do realize that, right?

We’re not in middle school, no one cares about being called gay

 

[yushmaxx]

You just conceded that you're gay. You do realize that, right?

dude we arent insecure, nobody cares if you call them gay, we arent in 2013 COD lobbies

i probably get more play than you

 

[ihatereddit]

dnr but having beauty standards for men is not gay if thats what u mean
obviously, you think a certain kind of man is attractive which is what you looksmax towards

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

i can call someone ugly without analyzing their face

also, you have a rubric for what features are attractive or not, its just that its subconscious

That's utterly retarded. A judgement is quite literally the direct output of cognitive processing. You cannot reach a conclusion about visual data without analyzing that data. That would be like me claiming that I can solve a math equation without doing any calculations.

You looked at the face, your brain processed the features, compared them to your standards, and spat out a verdict.

That is, by definition, an analysis.

how else would you be able to say if a guy is attractive or not

I do not say whether a guy is attractive or not. That is the entire point. I do not make the judgment because I do not have the rubric.

Why the fuck are you assuming that everyone is constantly running a male beauty pageant in their heads just because YOU'RE doing it. If your brain is constantly building detailed profiles of which male jaws and eyes look hot to you, you are sexually attracted to men.

You are just coping.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

We’re not in middle school, no one cares about being called gay

No, you dumbfuck. I never called you gay as an insult. You quite literally conceded that yourself. You conceded to having an internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. That would be a type in men. That would be gay.

 

[prolarper]

No, you dumbfuck. I never called you gay as an insult. You quite literally conceded that yourself. You conceded to having an internal baseline of what an attractive man is supposed to look like. That would be a type in men. That would be gay.

So what? Ur still ugly

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

dude we arent insecure, nobody cares if you call them gay, we arent in 2013 COD lobbies

Why are you defending your boyfriend? You do realize that it wasn't directed towards you, so why are you defending him...? Lmfao.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

So what?

You just proved my point. You have just conceded you're gay.

 

[prolarper]

You just proved my point. You have just conceded you're gay.

So what? Ur still chopped gng

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

So what?

Wait, so you DO concede you're gay? LMFAO?

 

[yushmaxx]

That's utterly retarded. A judgement is quite literally the direct output of cognitive processing. You cannot reach a conclusion about visual data without analyzing that data. That would be like me claiming that I can solve a math equation without doing any calculations.

You looked at the face, your brain processed the features, compared them to your standards, and spat out a verdict.

That is, by definition, an analysis.

I do not say whether a guy is attractive or not. That is the entire point. I do not make the judgment because I do not have the rubric.

Why the fuck are you assuming that everyone is constantly running a male beauty pageant in their heads just because YOU'RE doing it. If your brain is constantly building detailed profiles of which male jaws and eyes look hot to you, you are sexually attracted to men.

You are just coping.

You do understand how this website works, right?

Go to the ratings section, its dudes rating dudes.

Might wanna move somewhere else.

looksmax.org/delete


Also, we literally percieve facial attractiveness and other traits after 0.1 seconds of exposure. How am I supposed to analyze a face in that time? Its subconscious.

First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face - PubMed

People often draw trait inferences from the facial appearance of other people. We investigated the minimal conditions under which people make such inferences. In five experiments, each focusing on a specific trait judgment, we manipulated the exposure time of unfamiliar faces. Judgments made...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[yushmaxx]

Wait, so you DO concede you're gay? LMFAO?

dude nobody cares
calling people gay has no meaning

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

You do understand how this website works, right?

Go to the ratings section, its dudes rating dudes.

Might wanna move somewhere else.

Are you genuinely this fucking slow? "It's dudes rating dudes" as if that disqualifies anything I stated. That's literally what I'm referring to, you dumbass.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

dude nobody cares
calling people gay has no meaning

I never called him gay because he isn't gay. I called him gay because he conceded to being gay. Hence him stating "So what?"

Stop defending your boyfriend, retard.

 

[Whatever]

I’ve always thought this. Although this forum has actually gotten a bit better about this over the years, it used to be a bunch of zesty ass debates over who the hottest male model was.

There were users who would follow others around calling them ugly or saying they’re not hot enough in various ways, and if you read the post out loud in a sassy gay voice it made a lot more sense.

If I see someone with a recessed jaw or something, I’d tell them to get surgery to help them, at no point am I judging. I’ll let foids be the judge.

 

[yushmaxx]

Are you genuinely this fucking slow? "It's dudes rating dudes" as if that disqualifies anything I stated. That's literally what I'm referring to, you dumbass.

Dude like I said if you dont like that premise please leave.

Sitting here calling people gay is accomplishing nothing.

Stop wasting your time.

 

[Aㅤㅤㅤ]

Dude like I said if you dont like that premise please leave.

Sitting here calling people gay is accomplishing nothing.

Stop wasting your time.

Dnr

 

[yushmaxx]

Dnr

time wasting fetish jfl