Andremln
Luminary
- Joined
- May 14, 2023
- Posts
- 5,386
- Reputation
- 6,324
Yo bro, i like your posts but this shit is like entry level blackpill, water.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Which is?Ok just one condition
I was about to put more effort and talk about high trust vs low trust societies etc but realized it’ll be waste of timeYo bro, i like your posts but this shit is like entry level blackpill, water.
lying tooLust is a sin
Shut up spook
I was excited for no reason“The bar is in hell” - A sociological analysis
![]()
When foids say this they’re actually correct.
There are 2 bars you must clear to have a relationship. The bar for creating attraction, and the bar for maintaining attraction.
The bar for creating attraction is extremely high. Very strict and eugenic requirements in height, facial morphology, skeleton, social status, and/or money. Most modern men will never reach this invisible standard set by modern woman.
However, the second bar you must clear, the bar for maintaining attraction, is quite low. If you’re attractive to her, you won’t have to do much to keep it. This is the only bar she sees, because she doesn’t factor in the prerequisites. That’s because they’re mostly subconscious.
So when her 6’8 Chad doesnt do anything to help around the house or whatever, she will run to complain that the bar for men is so low that it’s in hell. She’s correct, but with one difference: the bar for Chad is in hell
What I see too often from normies when it comes to relationship advice is an overemphasis on the standard for maintaining attraction, and an ignorance of the standard for creating attraction. When in reality, taking into account the significance of each, it should really be the other way around.
Your post reminded me a little bit of this video, you might find it to be an interesting watchI was about to put more effort and talk about high trust vs low trust societies etc but realized it’ll be waste of time
You just found an even better reasonI was excited for no reason
Your post reminded me a little bit of this video, you might find it to be an interesting watch
I repented
Whataboutism final boss
What does that mean beaner
I like this better than htb nudes tbh.“The bar is in hell” - A sociological analysis
![]()
When foids say this they’re actually correct.
There are 2 bars you must clear to have a relationship. The bar for creating attraction, and the bar for maintaining attraction.
The bar for creating attraction is extremely high. Very strict and eugenic requirements in height, facial morphology, skeleton, social status, and/or money. Most modern men will never reach this invisible standard set by modern woman.
However, the second bar you must clear, the bar for maintaining attraction, is quite low. If you’re attractive to her, you won’t have to do much to keep it. This is the only bar she sees, because she doesn’t factor in the prerequisites. That’s because they’re mostly subconscious.
So when her 6’8 Chad doesnt do anything to help around the house or whatever, she will run to complain that the bar for men is so low that it’s in hell. She’s correct, but with one difference: the bar for Chad is in hell
What I see too often from normies when it comes to relationship advice is an overemphasis on the standard for maintaining attraction, and an ignorance of the standard for creating attraction. When in reality, taking into account the significance of each, it should really be the other way around.
translate cum eaterWhat does that mean beaner
FrI like this better than htb nudes tbh.
copetranslate cum eater
WdymI dont see anything here
I dont see any nudesWdym
Oh do you want themI dont see any nudes
Oh do you want them
Do you know @6ft4 ?Haven’t heard of this guy
Will watch
Is that Messi
Nah the name sounds familiar though, I’m sure Ive seen some posts of his beforeDo you know @6ft4 ?
Its his channel![]()
No thats ronaldo delimaIs that Messi
3rd worlder humorNo thats ronaldo delima
Yeah he deleted, he made a couple of really good threads that motivated me and other aspies a lot, matter of fact Clavicular seemed to admire him to the point of paraphrasing shit on his streams that he talked about.Nah the name sounds familiar though, I’m sure Ive seen some posts of his before
Did he delete?
ok3rd worlder humor
I dmed you again, I js got insecure ngl I want to see if I need a rhino@mltn2mtn Why did you dm me then delete it lol
sorry daddyYou have to apologize to me first
proof or it didn’t happen“The bar is in hell” - A sociological analysis
![]()
When foids say this they’re actually correct.
There are 2 bars you must clear to have a relationship. The bar for creating attraction, and the bar for maintaining attraction.
The bar for creating attraction is extremely high. Very strict and eugenic requirements in height, facial morphology, skeleton, social status, and/or money. Most modern men will never reach this invisible standard set by modern woman.
However, the second bar you must clear, the bar for maintaining attraction, is quite low. If you’re attractive to her, you won’t have to do much to keep it. This is the only bar she sees, because she doesn’t factor in the prerequisites. That’s because they’re mostly subconscious.
So when her 6’8 Chad doesnt do anything to help around the house or whatever, she will run to complain that the bar for men is so low that it’s in hell. She’s correct, but with one difference: the bar for Chad is in hell
What I see too often from normies when it comes to relationship advice is an overemphasis on the standard for maintaining attraction, and an ignorance of the standard for creating attraction. When in reality, taking into account the significance of each, it should really be the other way around.