Humans are so foolish.

[MrGlutton]

Let's take a look at the United Kingdom.

They're so sjw, it's absolutely ridiculous, but do you want to know what's the most ironic part of it all? The Royal Family.

You'd think that since the British people are so for equality, they would have already abolish the monarchy. But no. They insist on letting people who do absolutely nothing to have lives more entitled and rich than theirs. You just have to laugh at these pathetic people.

 

[ElliotRodgerJr]

But muh royal baby, muh tradition, muh 2% black princess

 

[Deleted member 656]

It's a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. The monarch cannot infringe on our rights as British citizens. Included in that is the right to vote for representatives in our House of Commons. The other branch of Parliament, the House of Lords, which consists of members of the nobility or those appointed by the Queen, has the ability to veto legislation from the House of Commons but not to propose their own. The Queen herself also has the ability to veto legislation.

It's a system designed to ensure our liberty, rather than to restrict it. Democracies to frequently turn tyrannical. It means the majority can't screw over the ruling class, and because of our constitution, the ruling class can't screw over the majority.

It's not cucked to accept hierarchy when being in a subordinate position is better for you than going it alone.

But all of that aside you're completely wrong. The British SJW types are staunchy Republican and want the Monarchy abolished. That's true even up to Corbyn. It's the Conservative types that are the monarchists.

 

[BrettyBoy]

UK laws are dumb.

 

[ElliotRodgerJr]

It's a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. The monarch cannot infringe on our rights as British citizens. Included in that is the right to vote for representatives in our House of Commons. The other branch of Parliament, the House of Lords, which consists of members of the nobility or those appointed by the Queen, has the ability to veto legislation from the House of Commons but not to propose their own. The Queen herself also has the ability to veto legislation.

It's a system designed to ensure our liberty, rather than to restrict it. Democracies to frequently turn tyrannical. It means the majority can't screw over the ruling class, and because of our constitution, the ruling class can't screw over the majority.

It's not cucked to accept hierarchy when being in a subordinate position is better for you than going it alone.

But all of that aside you're completely wrong. The British SJW types are staunchy Republican and want the Monarchy abolished. That's true even up to Corbyn. It's the Conservative types that are the monarchists.

Din red big nerd

 

[Deleted member 656]

Din red big nerd

Yes you fucking did and every single word lives rent free in the back of your mind

 

[ElliotRodgerJr]

Yes you fucking did and every single word lives rent free in the back of your mind

Wow this is brootal

 

[Deleted member 1560]

Death to the west

 

[nausea]

Death to the west

 

[Deleted member 1476]

It's a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. The monarch cannot infringe on our rights as British citizens. Included in that is the right to vote for representatives in our House of Commons. The other branch of Parliament, the House of Lords, which consists of members of the nobility or those appointed by the Queen, has the ability to veto legislation from the House of Commons but not to propose their own. The Queen herself also has the ability to veto legislation.

It's a system designed to ensure our liberty, rather than to restrict it. Democracies to frequently turn tyrannical. It means the majority can't screw over the ruling class, and because of our constitution, the ruling class can't screw over the majority.

It's not cucked to accept hierarchy when being in a subordinate position is better for you than going it alone.

But all of that aside you're completely wrong. The British SJW types are staunchy Republican and want the Monarchy abolished. That's true even up to Corbyn. It's the Conservative types that are the monarchists.

High IQ post. Never looked at it that way before. Read every single word bro

 

[Ritalincel]

It's a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. The monarch cannot infringe on our rights as British citizens. Included in that is the right to vote for representatives in our House of Commons. The other branch of Parliament, the House of Lords, which consists of members of the nobility or those appointed by the Queen, has the ability to veto legislation from the House of Commons but not to propose their own. The Queen herself also has the ability to veto legislation.

It's a system designed to ensure our liberty, rather than to restrict it. Democracies to frequently turn tyrannical. It means the majority can't screw over the ruling class, and because of our constitution, the ruling class can't screw over the majority.

It's not cucked to accept hierarchy when being in a subordinate position is better for you than going it alone.

But all of that aside you're completely wrong. The British SJW types are staunchy Republican and want the Monarchy abolished. That's true even up to Corbyn. It's the Conservative types that are the monarchists.

 

[Insomniac]

It’s a right load of codswallop I tell you!

 

[Ritalincel]

 

[MrGlutton]

It's a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. The monarch cannot infringe on our rights as British citizens. Included in that is the right to vote for representatives in our House of Commons. The other branch of Parliament, the House of Lords, which consists of members of the nobility or those appointed by the Queen, has the ability to veto legislation from the House of Commons but not to propose their own. The Queen herself also has the ability to veto legislation.

It's a system designed to ensure our liberty, rather than to restrict it. Democracies to frequently turn tyrannical. It means the majority can't screw over the ruling class, and because of our constitution, the ruling class can't screw over the majority.

It's not cucked to accept hierarchy when being in a subordinate position is better for you than going it alone.

But all of that aside you're completely wrong. The British SJW types are staunchy Republican and want the Monarchy abolished. That's true even up to Corbyn. It's the Conservative types that are the monarchists.

Constitutional monarchy or absolute, it doesn't matter as the family who benefits from either versions of monarchy, still enjoy the unfair magnificence of wealth and service than ordinary people. I've never said anything about the monarch infringing upon the right of the British people, I've said that the monarch, or royal family enjoy unfair advantages due to their "bloodline."

The British queen does have the ability to veto legislation, but does she do it? No she doesn't. I don't really know that she's done any power moves throughout her career, therefore what's the point of keeping her position as queen? So the British people want to keep the monarchy as a "figure." or sort, that's basically saying "OKAY THEN LET'S KEEP THIS FAMILY WHO HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO EARN THEIR PRIVILEGES TO BE MORE ADVANTAGEOUS THAN US."

you can not deny that people simply being born into a family of wealth and fame isn't fair. (unless the family did something to earn it, a generation or two prior) Sure hundreds of years ago, the British queen's ancestors did some conquering or whatever. However to use this as an excuse for hundreds of years, to maintain unfair advantages over the common people is retarded. Keeping them as a figurehead is even worse.

 

[Deleted member 656]

Constitutional monarchy or absolute, it doesn't matter as the family who benefits from either versions of monarchy, still enjoy the unfair magnificence of wealth and service than ordinary people. I've never said anything about the monarch infringing upon the right of the British people, I've said that the monarch, or royal family enjoy unfair advantages due to their "bloodline."

The British queen does have the ability to veto legislation, but does she do it? No she doesn't. I don't really know that she's done any power moves throughout her career, therefore what's the point of keeping her position as queen? So the British people want to keep the monarchy as a "figure." or sort, that's basically saying "OKAY THEN LET'S KEEP THIS FAMILY WHO HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO EARN THEIR PRIVILEGES TO BE MORE ADVANTAGEOUS THAN US."

you can not deny that people simply being born into a family of wealth and fame isn't fair. (unless the family did something to earn it, a generation or two prior) Sure hundreds of years ago, the British queen's ancestors did some conquering or whatever. However to use this as an excuse for hundreds of years, to maintain unfair advantages over the common people is retarded. Keeping them as a figurehead is even worse.

Her contribution is her mere existence as head of state. The existence of a monarch binded by a constitution is the single greatest protection against tyranny as of yet conceived.

If the cost for that is that some unelected and perhaps undeserving people get a life of comfort, I do not see the issue. Unless you're saying we should all be equal, at which point you're getting into leftist territory.

 

[Hunter]

It’s a right load of codswallop I tell you!

u fockin wot mate. me and my mates will fucking deck u ya cheeky nando. walk off bellend.

 

[middayshowers]

dumb argument. the royals make far more for the UK in terms of tax revenue due to the increased tourism than they spend on them