D
Deleted member 14693
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Posts
- 36,752
- Reputation
- 65,070
That just shows how unnatural we live, no, modern society didn't improve our lifes...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
He roped after he got bullied in club penguinPoor guy found penguins.org and saw his genetics were inferior
Dude pulled this straight out of his ass.Humans have always committed suicide even in natural times
Caveman loses his whole family to animal and ropes
It’s always happened that’s why it was considered a sinn it’s not reascent thing
His mate died, bro decided it's best to check outPoor guy found penguins.org and saw his genetics were inferior
We don't live longer, you can't live longer if you don't follow your natural diet.We live longer in modern day . We are safer we are just bored in modern day. And animals might not have the cognitive ability to commit sucide
Never heard such thing tbh.Caveman loses his whole family to animal and ropes
We objectively do live longer you have shown no evidence that cavemen live longer but I didWe don't live longer, you can't live longer if you don't follow your natural diet.
Yeah, only animals in captivity commit suicideOther species like monkeys do aswell if you put them in them in unnatrual envrioments
They also start doing other weird stuff
Lol you can't even compare it to today lol. "Humans have always commited suicide"Humans have always committed suicide even in natural times
Caveman loses his whole family to animal and ropes
It’s always happened that’s why it was considered a sinn it’s not reascent thing
Yeah, only animals in captivity commit suicide
You didn't show any evidence. Im just using common sense. And people who traveled to indigenous folks found people who got olderWe objectively do live longer you have shown no evidence that cavemen live longer but I did
I posted a study. You talking about things you have done 0 reacherch in so I dont give af about your common sense.You didn't show any evidence. Im just using common sense. And people who traveled to indigenous folks found people who got older
At What Age Is Death Inevitable ? - The Raw Primal Diet by Aajonus
by aajonus vonderplanitz, hon. ph.d. nutrition Death comes seldomly in my work. I consider death only 2-3 times yearly in my several hundred clients who are over 60 years of age when most deaths are expected. My mind views any death prior to at least age 138 as a premature death. I arrived at that…www.primaldiet.net
No I haven’t many cases of warriors killing themselves after they felt they lost honorDude pulled this straight out of his ass.
How can you study that, you can't study smth thats so long ago.I posted a study. You talking about things you have done 0 reacherch in so I dont give af about your common sense.
And thats a blog
the bible was written when we already settled down and society was created you utter retardThe sole fact it’s in the bible proves it’s not a modern thing
He won't kill himself.But what do u honestly think a human that loses everything will do in those times? A high chance of suicide
Nah bro we are healthier than ever brahHow can you study that, you can't study smth thats so long ago.
Bone remains and other things but i am not sure .and you should know how to study it if you talk about it all the timeHow can you study that, you can't study smth thats so long ago.
nigga ur a retard if u think intelligent beings who also know we are gonna die , exactly he only ones who know that won’t kill ourselves even in those timesthe bible was written when we already settled down and society was created you utter retard
He won't kill himself.
Couldn’t handle the mogHe roped after he got bullied in club penguin
We clearly can see that people live till 120 so thats obviously the natural human lifespan.Bone remains and other things but i am not sure .and you should know how to study it if you talk about it all the time
Real study >your so called comm sense btw tjat isn't common sense
What are you even trying to say.nigga ur a retard if u think intelligent beings who also know we are gonna die , exactly he only ones who know that won’t kill ourselves even in those times
Ur the retard
Couldn’t handle the mog
No point in arguing with that braindead zog agentthe bible was written when we already settled down and society was created you utter retard
He won't kill himself.
They aren't stressed like we are.Suicides in Amish communities are low - no electricity, tight community, conservative values
@ShowerMaxxingInstagram account called gymcels wiht 140k followers ?
The study shows in modern day people live longer and 120 is the maxium and is a outlier.We clearly can see that people live till 120 so thats obviously the natural human lifespan.
The bones they found obviously didn't die of old age.
Nigga depressive things happening isn’t stopped because u live in nature u utter MongolWhat are you even trying to say.
Stop this retardation, in a natural environment no human will kill themself.
Yeah, outlier cause we live unnatural lifestyles. If we lived natural lifestyle it would obviously be the norm.The study shows in modern day people live longer and 120 is the maxium and is a outlier.
Not the ones that live die by old age in the wild. The wild is giving and taking. You will get killed by another animal most likely. Beautiful cycle.Yeah because People die way earlier in the past for various reason and animals in capitivty live longer then wild animals
You haven't used a single study and studies can't be influenced either way.Use studies not your baseless view
We are like other animals as in we have a survival instinct which can only be set aside by mental illness, mental illness only occurs cause of chemical inbalance in your body, meaning wrong lifestyle and bad nutrition.Nigga depressive things happening isn’t stopped because u live in nature u utter Mongol
HUMANS ARE NOT LIKE OTHER ANIMALS THEY THINK AND WILL KILL THEMSELVES EVEN IN THAT ENVIRONMENT
U HAVE NO PROOF OTHERWISE UR LITERALLY PULLING THID OUT OF UR ASS AS WELL IM GIVING THE MORE REALISTIC OPTION
You have no evidence for the first point the studies debunks tour point.Yeah, outlier cause we live unnatural lifestyles. If we lived natural lifestyle it would obviously be the norm.
Not the ones that live till old in the wild. The wild is giving and taking. You will get killed by another animal most likely. Beautiful cycle.
You haven't used a single study and studies can't be influenced either way.
Also you aren't responding to the topics of humans clearly being the most unhappy species of all, cause you can't and don't want to admit, you are still coping that you live in modern "paradise" while even admitting you are depressed and bored.
No, it doesn't since they don't look at old age. Tell me how people live till 120 then?You have no evidence for the first point the studies debunks tour point.
Yeah, cause of the modern lifestyle.Barely anyone live till they get old
Read it and haven't seen a single proof inside. Clearly you haven't read.I used a study last time but it was hard to read but it seems it help my point https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497824/ and they say hunter gather more similar to chimpaze it but was a hard read.
Boredom is a mental illness that only occurs in horrible unnatural societies.Because i am bored and boredom come with good society and I would be dead in a hunter gather society
Dude pulled this straight out of his ass.We don't live longer, you can't live longer if you don't follow your natural diet.
most striking finding is that the mortality profile of hunter-gatherers is closer to that of wild chimpanzees than it is to the recent profiles for Japan and Sweden. This result is implied by visual inspection of Fig. 1B and is consistent with life expectancies for each population, but can be more clearly seen by calculating ratios of age-specific chances of death (Fig. 1C). Up until age 15 or so, hunter-gatherers experience death rates >100-fold higher than in today’s Japan and Sweden, and hunter-gatherer mortality remains >10-fold higher for the entire life span (Fig. 1C). In contrast, the ratio of death rates for wild chimpanzees to hunter-gatherers is <10 at all ages and is greater at older ages than at younger ages. Remarkably, the mortality ratio of hunter-gatherers to Sweden in 1900 is smaller, <5 at all ages. That is, Swedes in 1900 had mortality profiles closer to hunter-gatherers it straight up disagree with youNo, it doesn't since they don't look at old age. Tell me how people live till 120 then?
Yeah, cause of the modern lifestyle.
Read it and haven't seen a single proof inside. Clearly you haven't read.
Boredom is a mental illness that only occurs in horrible unnatural societies.
In hunter gatherer times you would be living in bliss.
Where is the proof. Its just written that it is that way but no proof is provided.most striking finding is that the mortality profile of hunter-gatherers is closer to that of wild chimpanzees than it is to the recent profiles for Japan and Sweden. This result is implied by visual inspection of Fig. 1B and is consistent with life expectancies for each population, but can be more clearly seen by calculating ratios of age-specific chances of death (Fig. 1C). Up until age 15 or so, hunter-gatherers experience death rates >100-fold higher than in today’s Japan and Sweden, and hunter-gatherer mortality remains >10-fold higher for the entire life span (Fig. 1C). In contrast, the ratio of death rates for wild chimpanzees to hunter-gatherers is <10 at all ages and is greater at older ages than at younger ages. Remarkably, the mortality ratio of hunter-gatherers to Sweden in 1900 is smaller, <5 at all ages. That is, Swedes in 1900 had mortality profiles closer to hunter-gatherers it straight up disagree with you
Maybe you would be dead, but if you wouldn't you would live in bliss. Deaths of infants is irrelevent btw.Borsedom happen in rich and safe society and I would be dead in hunter gather societys.
Even if you didn't, you would have the best life possible. Quality over quantity. But if you get lucky and neither get killed or starve you would also get the quantity.I probably wouldnt live to 50 in a hunter gather society
The data is in the methodolgy and the graph is above it.Where is the proof. Its just written that it is that way but no proof is provided.
Maybe you would be dead, but if you wouldn't you would live in bliss. Deaths of infants is irrelevent btw.
Even if you didn't, you would have the best life possible. Quality over quantity. But if you get lucky and neither get killed or starve you would also get the quantity.
Post the proof if it is thereThe data is in the methodolgy and the graph is above it.
You woulnd't get diseases, thats a modern meme.It just dont include death infants but I guess it is. I most likely would be dead have lost many people.
Or get disease i most likely would never get the quanitity. Everyone in modern day can get the quality and quanitity
Poor guy found penguins.org and saw his genetics were inferior
The national data for Sweden, France, and Japan come from the Human Mortality Database (17). The estimates for hunter-gatherer, acculturated hunter-gatherer, wild chimpanzee, and captive chimpanzee populations are from Gurven and Kaplan (3): they fit Siler functions to ethnographically observed mortality data. We use these Siler fits to generate estimates of the force of mortality at various ages. We convert the age-specific force of mortality μ(x) to the age-specific probability of death q(x) by q(x) = 1 − exp(−μ(x + 0.5)). The hunter-gatherer and acculturated hunter-gatherer curves are each aggregations of multiple groups. The hunter-gatherer groups included in the Siler fit are the Hadza, Ache Forest, Hiwi, !Kung, and Agta. The acculturated hunter-gatherer groups are the !Kung from 1963 to 1974, the Reservation Ache, Northern Territory Aborigines, Hiwi post-1960, Agta transitional, and Agta peasant (see ref. 3 for details). The demographic data on Trinidadian slaves are from John (37) and were also analyzed by Levitis and Lackey (38).Post the proof if it is there
You woulnd't get diseases, thats a modern meme.
If you genuinly think everyone can get a quality life you are retarted.
So they used modern "hunter-gatherers". Not comparable.The national data for Sweden, France, and Japan come from the Human Mortality Database (17). The estimates for hunter-gatherer, acculturated hunter-gatherer, wild chimpanzee, and captive chimpanzee populations are from Gurven and Kaplan (3): they fit Siler functions to ethnographically observed mortality data. We use these Siler fits to generate estimates of the force of mortality at various ages. We convert the age-specific force of mortality μ(x) to the age-specific probability of death q(x) by q(x) = 1 − exp(−μ(x + 0.5)). The hunter-gatherer and acculturated hunter-gatherer curves are each aggregations of multiple groups. The hunter-gatherer groups included in the Siler fit are the Hadza, Ache Forest, Hiwi, !Kung, and Agta. The acculturated hunter-gatherer groups are the !Kung from 1963 to 1974, the Reservation Ache, Northern Territory Aborigines, Hiwi post-1960, Agta transitional, and Agta peasant (see ref. 3 for details). The demographic data on Trinidadian slaves are from John (37) and were also analyzed by Levitis and Lackey (38).
Equivalent age was calculated using the “approx” function in R with the syntax: approx([hunter-gatherer qx],[vector of ages for interpolation], [qx data for reference population]), where qx is the annual probability of death for the population.
They immune system just destroys them.Ans you get that from your ass tjat people don't get disease
Only modern humans or unnatural diseases.Most can maybe even all
Why does it matter if its modern and you claimed with a vlog by looking at modern day people to prove your point so your view changed in a hour. but I used actual hunter-gatherer in modern day. And those hunter are more similar to huntwr in the past then in modern daySo they used modern "hunter-gatherers". Not comparable.
They immune system just destroys them.
Only modern humans or unnatural diseases.