Humans are violent bastards because males distorted natural selection in favor of psychopaths

[disillusioned]

Think about it. We all thought women wanted large and masculine monsters but all the Tinder/Tiktok shit we've seen shows us they actually want cute prettyboys (albeit ones who are ripped with some muscle) even the older ones.

Which makes me think...what if humans evolving to be violent/insane ISN'T the the path evolution would have taken if nature had simply been allowed to take its course naturally by letting females choose their sexual partners? For all of recorded history breeding was controlled by males with the higher status ones getting most of the women regardless of if the women even wanted them or not. And for most of history: Successful = Evil/Psyco

I can't help but wonder if this may have something to do with humans being so fucked up. Are modern humans just the monstrous end result of males distorting the human gene pool by artificially selecting for anti-social traits? If women had been free all along, would we all be a bunch of emotionally sensitive pretty boys rather than aggressive ogres?

This is pretty mindblowing to think about tbh ngl.

 

[Deleted member 16134]

And another high iq post by squidward
You see back in primitive times men needes to be strong and muscular to get mates , but that wasn't necessary the choice of the female
Now for the first time in human history women are getting to chose

 

[Alt Number 3]

 

[Papal_Guard]

If women were to choose we would be extinct as a species

 

[MostGLSlayer]

Think about it. We all thought women wanted large and masculine monsters but all the Tinder/Tiktok shit we've seen shows us they actually want cute prettyboys (albeit ones who are ripped with some muscle) even the older ones.

Which makes me think...what if humans evolving to be violent/insane ISN'T the the path evolution would have taken if nature had simply been allowed to take its course naturally by letting females choose their sexual partners? For all of recorded history breeding was controlled by males with the higher status ones getting most of the women regardless of if the women even wanted them or not. And for most of history: Successful = Evil/Psyco

I can't help but wonder if this may have something to do with humans being so fucked up. Are modern humans just the monstrous end result of males distorting the human gene pool by artificially selecting for anti-social traits? If women had been free all along, would we all be a bunch of emotionally sensitive pretty boys rather than aggressive ogres?

This is pretty mindblowing to think about tbh ngl.

Pretty boys are still men though lol. Doesnt mean you are emotional just cause you're a pretty boy.

 

[Deleted member 17201]

Humans aren't violent bastards they're pathetic pieces of soy shit with no bones because one of their races decided to turn the tide towards soys like niggers gooks curries and crackers.

 

[disillusioned]

Pretty boys are still men though lol. Doesnt mean you are emotional just cause you're a pretty boy.

This is actually false. Your physical traits say a good deal about you. You can accurately judge someone's personality and traits by their appearance. This is because things like hormones influence appearance. There is a reason soy/neurotic neckbeard leftists are stereotyped as being that way. It's because they are.

Prettyboys aren't necessarily all a bunch of faggots, but they also are unlikely to be low IQ/violent/stupid/thug etc.

Women want pretty boys because they are genetically fit yet also less temperamental/aggressive than the machomen.

 

[ADHDcel I need sum]

Women want big violent monsters the prettyboy faggot shit is cope your the gay bestfriend

 

[Deleted member 4301]

 

[disillusioned]

Women want big violent monsters the prettyboy faggot shit is cope your the gay bestfriend

 

[Tusseleif]

Probably. Humans are detestable creatures

 

[Esteban1997]

maybe we were ment to be this way?

 

[LookmaxBlau]

Hm never thought of it that way you might be on to something

 

[EverythingMattersCel]

The funny thing is it's bluepilled to assume women select for these traits.

The truth is (and what's evident from the research) is that women are indifferent to the personLigu traits of their partner. As long as he doesn't have debilitating illness like severe augism or schizo, then no impact on mating prospects. If he's good looking, they put up with any negative personality traits.

The only reason psychopaths have more sex is because they pursue sex more than the average person.

 

[Deleted member 17654]

Women have shown to be attracted and prefer Dark Triad charasteristics. Read the incelwiki article on dark triad.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Think about it. We all thought women wanted large and masculine monsters but all the Tinder/Tiktok shit we've seen shows us they actually want cute prettyboys (albeit ones who are ripped with some muscle) even the older ones.

Females referring to the reproductive process when presented with specific males megathread

The title may seem autistic, but this assesses male sexual attractiveness based on female reproductive interest. Post the source, and try to verify that the examples aren't written by faggots.

looksmax.org

 

[BearBoy]

Women want big violent monsters the prettyboy faggot shit is cope your the gay bestfriend

 

[Frankie]

all teen girls want are eboys ie prettyboys but idk if thats the same with older mature women. Taste is subjective and diff women ahve diff types. But the dude is always attractive but niche

 

[Deleted member 6825]

just watch his videos

 

[Deleted member 2382]

For all of recorded history breeding was controlled by males with the higher status ones getting most of the women regardless of if the women even wanted them or not.

Women would be more attracted to a 50th percentile looks guy with gigastatus than a 90th percentile looks guy who is a nobody
Women are the ones who prioritize status over pure genetic fitness so long as the guy with status has no blatant defects
Even if some ugly but ruthless dark triads kings got to impregnate girls that were physically repulsed by them, examples of such would not be common enough to make a change in the gene pool

 

[Deleted member 17829]

The prettyboy thing is cope. Height is the no.1 trait(aka the size of a man and his bone structure)
showing they still want the most physically dominant man.

Then face.

You can not wipe away a 300,000 year old intrasexual selection instinct activism.