![MisterMercedes](/data/avatars/l/8/8158.jpg?1627594426)
MisterMercedes
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2020
- Posts
- 3,661
- Reputation
- 3,835
Reminder that not meeting all the requirements of Hunter eyes doesn’t mean your eye area isn’t hunter. As long as it’s more hunter than it is prey, it is hunter and an attractive eye area.
John Krasinski is a great example (yes, he is attractive; if you want proof, read the comments below his interviews or just look up his wife).
His eye area isn’t fully Hunter. They aren’t hooded, his medial canthus isn’t that downturned, he has bad under eye support, etc. However, they are about 3.3 times longer than they are tall, which is an ideal PFLH. In other words, they’re long and compact. They’re also PCT, have good coloring, and his eyebrows are thick.
Others:
John Krasinski is a great example (yes, he is attractive; if you want proof, read the comments below his interviews or just look up his wife).
His eye area isn’t fully Hunter. They aren’t hooded, his medial canthus isn’t that downturned, he has bad under eye support, etc. However, they are about 3.3 times longer than they are tall, which is an ideal PFLH. In other words, they’re long and compact. They’re also PCT, have good coloring, and his eyebrows are thick.
Others: