Hypergamy doesn't exist

[hebbewem]

dating men hotter than them makes women insecure

Only if they are much hotter otherwise it dosent make them insecure

 

[Deleted member 18582]

Only if they are much hotter otherwise it dosent make them insecure

.5 psl is usually enough

 

[hebbewem]

.5 psl is usually enough

I don't agree

 

[Deleted member 18582]

I want a cuckqueen
I have a baby face

 

[Deleted member 19445]

If I had any kind of game I’d have 100 slays by now

 

[Marsiere214]

keep coping greycel

 

[Lihito]

People fall in love, if it existed no average guy would ever get a gf. Posting again cuse sme low t butthurt losers had it taken down.

You just can't cope with the fact that you're ugly and can't get a gf, cry about it.

Install tinder and tell us how it went

You havent heard of Dual mating strategy greycell

 

[Lihito]

The real test is whether average guys get casual sex, not gfs. And for the most part they don’t

No , the actual real test is wheter normies get sex in LTR and how passionate that sex really is (women dont worship Sub chad genetics ) add concealed ovulation to it + Dual mating strategy + betabuxx and there you go

 

[Meteor21]

keep coping greycel

Coping with what? You being an incel? Lmao

 

[Meteor21]

Install tinder and tell us how it went

You havent heard of Dual mating strategy greycell

Pretty good

Cope

 

[Marsiere214]

Coping with what? You being an incel? Lmao

no u retard
the point is that ur coping with ur inceldom
ur giving me reddit tier comebacks btw

 

[Meteor21]

no u retard
the point is that ur coping with ur inceldom
ur giving me reddit tier comebacks btw

Still haven't said how I'm wrong and you're giving me nothing to work with lol

 

[Marsiere214]

Still haven't said how I'm wrong and you're giving me nothing to work with lol

how did u found this website?
before u continue browsing i recommend u watch faceandlms and itv

 

[Meteor21]

how did u found this website?
before u continue browsing i recommend u watch faceandlms and itv

I agree with some of the theories here. Normies lie and go out of their way to deny to avoid personal responsibility and because they worship womrn. But you guys are still wrong about some things

 

[Lihito]

Pretty good

Cope

Im pretty sure you are the one coping since Shitty face and height

You cant deny genetic determinism

@realklay11 take a look at this normie
@currylightskin
@FailedNormieManlet
@BearBoy

 

[Lihito]

I agree with some of the theories here. Normies lie and go out of their way to deny to avoid personal responsibility and because they worship womrn. But you guys are still wrong about some things

Prove IT! I dare you , prove the blackpill to me wrong

 

[Marsiere214]

I agree with some of the theories here. Normies lie and go out of their way to deny to avoid personal responsibility and because they worship womrn. But you guys are still wrong about some things

we all wanna be wrong

 

[St.TikTokcel]

 

[Meteor21]

Im pretty sure you are the one coping since Shitty face and height

You cant deny genetic determinism

@realklay11 take a look at this normie
@currylightskin
@FailedNormieManlet
@BearBoy

Lmao you literally see normies dating girls about as gl as them, daily

 

[Meteor21]

Prove IT! I dare you , prove the blackpill to me wrong

Say how I'm wrong instead of crying like a faggot lol

 

[Meteor21]

View attachment 1707512

Lol

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Lmao you literally see normies dating girls about as gl as them, daily

So being a cuckold paypig is what you consider "ascending"? Honestly, fold your clothes, put them in your backpack and leave. I won't be holding doors for any longer. Leave whilst you can.

 

[Meteor21]

So being a cuckold paypig is what you consider "ascending"? Honestly, fold your clothes, put them in your backpack and leave. I won't be holding doors for any longer. Leave whilst you can.

They're not making enough to be being betabuxed, keep lying to yourself

 

[Deleted member 9003]

Lmao you literally see normies dating girls about as gl as them, daily

But you don’t know how much effort they have to put in to get a relationship

 

[St.TikTokcel]

They're not making enough to be being betabuxed, keep lying to yourself

They are being emotional tampons. You seeing people outside doesn't mean shit. They could be siblings and etc.

 

[Meteor21]

But you don’t know how much effort they have to put in to get a relationship

Just talk to people, it'll happen eventually

 

[Meteor21]

They are being emotional tampons. You seeing people outside doesn't mean shit. They could be siblings and etc.

I'm sure siblings hold hands in public and go to Costco together.

 

[Deleted member 19548]

burrrp

 

[anticel]

Yeah dik where this comes from but incels think that every time women don't date chads they are betabuxxing or some shit. They don't realize how psychology, human nature and rejection plays a role. Women are (at least for a certain period) monogamous. If they get rejected (in real life) they literally have traumas and tend to take the next best thing that gives them validation as women. But that doesn't mean getting the next best thing isn't genuine love. Tinder and the internet as a whole just fucks with their brains.

 

[St.TikTokcel]

I'm sure siblings hold hands in public and go to Costco together.

Pointless to argue with transphobic racist niggers like you.

 

[Racky]

1. Looks play a role, you don't have to be a Chad though. It's not solely looks.

So you admit that looks play a role. I think we all agree on that and I don't think anyone claimed that it was solely looks, but mostly. Would you agree looks play the most important role when it comes to attraction, especially initially?

2. Leaving a guy when a better option arises

That's not hypergamy, that's monkey-branching. Two related, but different things. Monkey-branching is influenced by hypergamy, but monkey-branching isn't hypergamy. A woman needs to be in a relationship to monkey-branch, while a virgin single girl that never previously dated in her life can practice hypergamy. That said, are you denying that monkey-branching does happen?

3. Most people marry their looksmatch and make the same amount of money

Provide evidence for that statement. I will at least address the part about money.
Historically women have always married men who were more wealthy than them, and men never had much issues with dating a woman of lower economic status compared to them, and still don't, while wealth is very important to this day for women.

Spoiler: quotes

The most extensive of these studies included 10,000 people in 37 cultures across six continents and five islands (Buss, 1989). On the mate choice survey, women rated “good financial prospect” higher than did men in all cultures

Across age, ethnic status, and socioeconomic status, women preferred husbands who were better educated than they were and who earned more money than they did. Buunk and colleagues found the same pattern for women ranging in age from their 20s to their 60s (Buunk, Dijkstra, Fetchenhauer, & Kenrick, 2002)

Spoiler: quotes

http://web.simmons.edu/~turnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf

Also even if it's true there is a difference between what you desire and what you "settle" with. Human females generally seek partners who are of higher looks, status or income than them, but some will compromise in marriage for various reasons. What most people end up marrying does not disprove the point.

4. No, it's proof that many women are delusional and simps are partally to blame.

Your ealier 3rd point contradicts that statement. If women are delusional about their looks because of simps, then how can you say they mostly pair with their looksmatch, that they should normally find to be below them if we are to believe that statement you just made?
And that doesn't disprove what I said. Women can be delusional, and it can be because of simps, but that would still show that ugly men are very limited in their options compared to ugly females, and that "hypergamy" exists since ugly females are more likely to "date up" in looks, money and status.

Not only that, but all delusion and simps do is amplify something that already exists. It's very well known in evolutionary psychology that women are more selective than men in their mate choices and have always been, and not just human females!

5. If taken to its logical conclusion why would a woman EVER be with an average guy, even momentarily?

What logical conclusion?
That females generally seek partners that are above them in looks, money and status does not mean that a female cannot pair bond or that average males absolutely cannot ever get a woman in any circumstance.

 

[Deleted member 9819]

They dont

ur projecting

 

[Meteor21]

So you admit that looks play a role. I think we all agree on that and I don't think anyone claimed that it was solely looks, but mostly. Would you agree looks play the most important role when it comes to attraction, especially initially?

That's not hypergamy, that's monkey-branching. Two related, but different things. Monkey-branching is influenced by hypergamy, but monkey-branching isn't hypergamy. A woman needs to be in a relationship to monkey-branch, while a virgin single girl that never previously dated in her life can practice hypergamy. That said, are you denying that monkey-branching does happen?

Provide evidence for that statement. I will at least address the part about money.
Historically women have always married men who were more wealthy than them, and men never had much issues with dating a woman of lower economic status compared to them, and still don't, while wealth is very important to this day for women.

Spoiler: quotes

The most extensive of these studies included 10,000 people in 37 cultures across six continents and five islands (Buss, 1989). On the mate choice survey, women rated “good financial prospect” higher than did men in all cultures

Across age, ethnic status, and socioeconomic status, women preferred husbands who were better educated than they were and who earned more money than they did. Buunk and colleagues found the same pattern for women ranging in age from their 20s to their 60s (Buunk, Dijkstra, Fetchenhauer, & Kenrick, 2002)

Spoiler: quotes

http://web.simmons.edu/~turnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf

Your ealier 3rd point contradicts that statement. If women are delusional about their looks because of simps, then how can you say they only pair with their looksmatch, that they should normally find to be below them if we are to believe that statement?
And that doesn't disprove the statement. Women can be delusional, and it can be because of simps, but that would still show that ugly men are very limited in their options compared to ugly females, and that "hypergamy" exists since females are more likely to "date up" in looks, money and status.

Not only that, but all delusion and simps do is amplify something that already exists. It's very well known in evolutionary psychology that women are more selective than men in their mate choices and have always been, and not just human females!

What logical conclusion?
That females generally seek partners that are above them in looks, money and status does not mean that a female cannot pair bond or that average males absolutely cannot ever get a woman in any circumstance.

1. Mostly? Idk, she just gotta be attracted to you. Some ddes are fucked in that regard, regardless of how they improve.

2. I don't think falling in love is the same as her thinking you're as gl as Chad. If she's in love with you though you're basically chad though cause you're that special to her.

3. Regardless, most women date and marry goes with a more or less average income. That's my point, that it's not just her really after your money. Women have highr smv than men too, why is that not hypergamy?

4. Because in the normal range looks are more subjective, women just have more options and are pumped with validation. Doesnt mean an average guy cant get a decent looking gf, simps just make it harder.

5. Why would she pair bond if she can do better? That disproves hypergamy. Even if she cant secure chad she can secure a guy that's better than average looking with an average income.

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Say how I'm wrong instead of crying like a faggot lol

Uses the "lol" like an insecure whore hahahhahaha

 

[Deleted member 15338]

1. Mostly? Idk, she just gotta be attracted to you. Some ddes are fucked in that regard, regardless of how they improve.

2. I don't think falling in love is the same as her thinking you're as gl as Chad. If she's in love with you though you're basically chad though cause you're that special to her.

3. Regardless, most women date and marry goes with a more or less average income. That's my point, that it's not just her really after your money. Women have highr smv than men too, why is that not hypergamy?

4. Because in the normal range looks are more subjective, women just have more options and are pumped with validation. Doesnt mean an average guy cant get a decent looking gf, simps just make it harder.

5. Why would she pair bond if she can do better? That disproves hypergamy. Even if she cant secure chad she can secure a guy that's better than average looking with an average income.

I can tell u are a high inhib faggot by your posts, you will deny it obviously here but both u and me know it babyyy

 

[Meteor21]

Uses the "lol" like an insecure whore hahahhahaha

Lol

 

[Meteor21]

I can tell u are a high inhib faggots by your posts, you will deny it obviously here but both u and me know it babyyy

No u

 

[Deleted member 15338]

No u

Come clean, imagine larping on an incrl forum

 

[Racky]

Women have highr smv than men too, why is that not hypergamy?

Why do women have higher SMV than men?
They are more selective and men are less selective.

Because in the normal range looks are more subjective, women just have more options and are pumped with validation. Doesnt mean an average guy cant get a decent looking gf, simps just make it harder

I don't think anyone claimed that average men cannot ever in any circumstance get a woman, however they have much less options than women and average women are more likely than them to date up (hypergamy).

Why would she pair bond if she can do better?

Because she bonded?

That disproves hypergamy

Not it does not.
Women can generally seek men who are better in looks, money or status than them and still be able to pair bond.
If monkey-branching happens then it's because the bond is weak or damaged.
Hypergamy does not mean that monkey-branching automatically happens in literally every relationship circumstance.

Even if she cant secure chad she can secure a guy that's better than average looking with an average income

Indeed but who does she truly seek more? Who does she initially desire more?

 

[Meteor21]

Come clean, imagine larping on an incrl forum

What am I larping about? Everything you say is rooted in theory and pessimism

 

[Deleted member 15338]

What am I larping about? Everything you say is rooted in theory and pessimism

PSL stuff is just common sense and has nothing to with pessimism

 

[Meteor21]

Why do women have higher SMV than men?
They are more selective and men are less selective.

I don't think anyone claimed that average men cannot ever in any circumstance get a woman, however they have much less options than women and average women are more likely than them to date up (hypergamy).

Because she bonded?

Not it does not.
Women can generally seek men who are better in looks, money or status than them and still be able to pair bond.
If monkey-branching happens then it's because the bond is weak or damaged.
Hypergamy does not mean that monkey-branching automatically happens in literally every relationship circumstance.

Indeed but who does she truly seek more? Who does she initially desire more?

1. Cause men are horny. If you switch your settings to men on Tinder any dude will get 99+ likes in an hour.

2. They statistically still end up with an average looking guy with an average salary. If you don't deny they can do better it undermines the theory of hypergamy.

3. Yes, there's no room for love in hypergamy.

4. Chad if we mean putely aesthetics. But again, love undermines that. If you love your gf you're not likely to leave her even if Stacy says she wants to fuck you

 

[Meteor21]

PSL stuff is just common sense and has nothing to with pessimism

Yeah, rating people that are noticeably above average looking as 5.5 rather than 5 is common sense, only according to you autists

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Yeah, rating people that are noticeably above average looking as 5.5 rather than 5 is common sense, only according to you autists

Who cares about muh psl chart

Theories like 80/20 rule are just common sense and biology 101

 

[CFW432]

Yeah dik where this comes from but incels think that every time women don't date chads they are betabuxxing or some shit. They don't realize how psychology, human nature and rejection plays a role. Women are (at least for a certain period) monogamous. If they get rejected (in real life) they literally have traumas and tend to take the next best thing that gives them validation as women. But that doesn't mean getting the next best thing isn't genuine love. Tinder and the internet as a whole just fucks with their brains.

Actually wrong, studies find that if a woman is rejected by a man that she wants, she tends to reject the next average guy that ask her out in order to make up for her previous rejection. Look it up.

 

[Racky]

1. Cause men are horny.

Exactly! You just gave one biological reason for hypergamy and men being less selective than women

2. They statistically still end up with an average looking guy with an average salary. If you don't deny they can do better it undermines the theory of hypergamy.

Provide the statistic
Hypergamy can exist and women can still get a betabuxx. This does not disprove anything. I already provided a study showing women generally seek men who are above them in money and status.
Also hypergamy isn't even "muh pessimistic PSL theory". It's evo-psych and sociology that was established before FaceandLMS ever made a video.

3. Yes, there's no room for love in hypergamy.

4. Chad if we mean putely aesthetics. But again, love undermines that. If you love your gf you're not likely to leave her even if Stacy says she wants to fuck you

How does "love" initially happen?

 

[Meteor21]

Who cares about muh psl chart

Theories like 80/20 rule are just common sense and biology 101

So what? Why do you need an abundance of women?

 

[Deleted member 15338]

So what? Why do you need an abundance of women?

What a retarded mindset why do u need yo live then just kys

 

[anticel]

Actually wrong, studies find that if a woman is rejected by a man that she wants, she tends to reject the next average guy that ask her out in order to make up for her previous rejection. Look it up.

not talking about 1 rejection but consistently being cucked by a friend of her for example and consistently being ignored by chads

 

[Meteor21]

Exactly! You just gave one biological reason for hypergamy and men being less selective than women

Provide the statistic
Hypergamy can exist and women can still get a betabuxx. This does not disprove anything. I already provided a study showing women generally seek men who is above them in money and status.
Also hypergamy isn't even "muh pessimistic PSL theory". It's evo-psych and sociology that was established before FaceandLMS ever made a video.


How does "love" initially happen?

1. How is that hypergamy?

2. Are you fucking serious rn? Chad is rare, most men are average, most men get married

3. Again, why do most women marry a guy with average looks and income if hypergamy is real? Nobody is betabuxxing a guy with average income, holy shit

4. Attraction, personality, etc