casety
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2023
- Posts
- 53
- Reputation
- 33
think of it this way, there is already an asymmetry caused by anisogamy (eggs are big and costly while sperm is cheap and small), which gets amplified by the fact that mammalian birth involves internal fertilization, pregnancy, childbirth, and prolonged parental care by both parents.
Now, imagine over 2 million years some females belonging to a certain human species, living in groups, made poor decisions in choosing a mate and hence ended up giving birth to suboptimal offspring. Their offspring would end up childless due to their suboptimal traits and would ultimately get removed from the gene pool. Hence, over time, the selective females would dominate human species over 2 million years which would create an asymmetry in choosing mates since a male human could impregnate several women in a single day.
This is actually the leading theory behind the neanderthals’ extinction, they cucked homo sapiens and got bred out of existence because they were manlier. Modern europeans’ neanderthal gene contributions are mostly from male neanderthals.
Now, imagine over 2 million years some females belonging to a certain human species, living in groups, made poor decisions in choosing a mate and hence ended up giving birth to suboptimal offspring. Their offspring would end up childless due to their suboptimal traits and would ultimately get removed from the gene pool. Hence, over time, the selective females would dominate human species over 2 million years which would create an asymmetry in choosing mates since a male human could impregnate several women in a single day.
This is actually the leading theory behind the neanderthals’ extinction, they cucked homo sapiens and got bred out of existence because they were manlier. Modern europeans’ neanderthal gene contributions are mostly from male neanderthals.