Hypergamy is not natural

[Mongrelcel]

The percentage of men who are able to obtain sexual access is highly variable depending on culture. Feminist and polygamous societies entail a large percentage of men forced into celibacy. Interestingly, the 20 most unstable societies in the world are polygamous and racked by civil war.

In hunter-gatherer bands (nomadic foragers) some men have sex much more than others (hence the DNA disparities) but all or most young men have sex. Attempts to monopolize either resources or sexual access are considered the greatest social transgression:

Yet nomadic hunter-gatherers have nevertheless been uniformly egalitarian, seemingly for thousands if not millions of years. Boehm explains this seeming contradiction with the claim that hunter-gatherers have “reverse dominance hierarchies”: the adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a few allies, from dominating the others. Male egalitarianism is not necessarily extended to females—the degree to which females are subject to male despotism varies, even among hunter-gatherers. But the reverse dominance hierarchy prevents the monopolization of females by dominant males. This makes possible the heterosexual nuclear family as we know it, based on (relatively) stable cross-gender pair bonding and mutual nurturance of children by parents, precisely what is missing in our closest primate relatives.

(http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Hunter-Gatherers’_Egalitarianism)

When hierarchies developed, rulers realized that enforced monogamy would "spread the wealth" and make it less likely that they'd be overthrown.
Since we have lived as nomadic foragers for 95 percent of our history, and since most societies developed enforced monogamy, one could well argue that feminist societies are extremely unnatural.

TLDR: the argument many people use (even here) that women are naturally hypergamous, and that it makes sense that only the best of the best men have access to sex, is a total nonsense. During most of our history, the societies were balanced, all men had access to sex (AF/BB still occurred however), but modern hellscape of dating is a result of unnatural feminist intervention.

 

[thereallegend]

Hunter-Gatherer times were a form of primitive communism because humans had to work together to survive. No surplus value could be created. Humans were scrapping for bare essentials.

The Agricultural Revolution allowed humans to produce surplus value and hence it wasn't distributed evenly. Class divisions were made. Most men were slaves at this point.

Hypergamy was exacerbated by the Agricultural Revolution because the socioeconomic differences became too hard to ignore.

 

[thereallegend]

Don't think just become something isn't "natural" that it isn't beneficial.

The problem with Tails' theory on why women should be given full agency to select sexually is that women with bad genes get to reproduce.

If one were to make a eugenicist argument for modern dating, men would also need more power to weed out these landwhales from the gene pool.

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

Don't think just become something isn't "natural" that it isn't beneficial.

The problem with Tails' theory on why women should be given full agency to select sexually is that women with bad genes get to reproduce.

If one were to make a eugenicist argument for modern dating, men would also need more power to weed out these landwhales from the gene pool.

Nothing wrong with landwhales genetics they’re just fat

But if anything a slim girl with a reccessed jaw has a way better chance of getting a chad than a landwhale who’s probably better genetic stock does

 

[Deleted member 21620]

Nothing wrong with landwhales genetics they’re just fat

But if anything a slim girl with a reccessed jaw has a way better chance of getting a chad than a landwhale who’s probably better genetic stock does

a lot of girls with good faces fuck themselves up by getting fat