Hyperinflation of "Rating" threads.

[iwannabechanglite]

Its no secret that the people who post on the rate threads are either the most good looking people you will see ever borderline Chads, or the worst of the worst LTNs. Why is it like this? Does invoke unrealistic rating standards?

Simply yes, the extremely good looking people cause a hyperinflation in the rate form, causing the most retarded .org users to either deflate or inflate their ratings. Keep in mind most people are usually High LTN, however if someone just has a good jaw that automatically locks him for HTN all of a sudden. Ratings on org are the most bullshit way to actually deem your looks.

Very rarely does anyone get rated what they are, if you do not have girls asking you out every now and then, you can just assume your on the lower spectrum. If you have decent game, you can expect yourself to be in mid-high range. Rating though can be determined objectively, are decided purely of instinctive choice (First person rating) and most people follow the herd or standing in a neutral stance in case it might turn on them. It's a online forum, if your so scared of what people are going to think of you, don't post yourself.

If your going to rate someone you should base your rating of instinctive looks. Basically, if you see someone and it makes you wonder "damn" in a good sense, clearly he is HTN +, anything that isn't surprising will be in the High LTN - MTN range, and something that makes you think "damn" in a bad sense is clearly LTN.

However this hyperinflation in the rate forums actually evens out at times, because very rarely does the average looking person post, its the incels who do.

 

[Xangsane]

Its no secret that the people who post on the rate threads are either the most good looking people you will see ever borderline Chads, or the worst of the worst LTNs. Why is it like this? Does invoke unrealistic rating standards?

Simply yes, the extremely good looking people cause a hyperinflation in the rate form, causing the most retarded .org users to either deflate or inflate their ratings. Keep in mind most people are usually High LTN, however if someone just has a good jaw that automatically locks him for HTN all of a sudden. Ratings on org are the most bullshit way to actually deem your looks.

Very rarely does anyone get rated what they are, if you do not have girls asking you out every now and then, you can just assume your on the lower spectrum. If you have decent game, you can expect yourself to be in mid-high range. Rating though can be determined objectively, are decided purely of instinctive choice (First person rating) and most people follow the herd or standing in a neutral stance in case it might turn on them. It's a online forum, if your so scared of what people are going to think of you, don't post yourself.

If your going to rate someone you should base your rating of instinctive looks. Basically, if you see someone and it makes you wonder "damn" in a good sense, clearly he is HTN +, anything that isn't surprising will be in the High LTN - MTN range, and something that makes you think "damn" in a bad sense is clearly LTN.

However this hyperinflation in the rate forums actually evens out at times, because very rarely does the average looking person post, its the incels who do.

PAT PAT!

 

[Bryce]

I just ignore the ratings thread at this point. Cheekbiting MTNs and awful ragebait is all it is

 

[Saint Casanova]

I don’t get why it’s so hard to understand that if you’re not doing well ( in OLD matches, and best of all sexual outcomes) then you’re most likely not GL enough.

It’s very simple to understand.

 

[Bryce]

I don’t get why it’s so hard to understand that if you’re not doing well ( in OLD matches, and best of all sexual outcomes) then you’re most likely not GL enough.

It’s very simple to understand.

Not when you're a fucking idiot like 99% of the people who create their account just to ask for a rating. Never posted my face here and never will, I own a mirror and can actually understand social cues jfl