I always thought Michele moronne was south Asian until I realized he’s Italian

soggra

soggra

Fuchsia
Joined
Jun 12, 2023
Posts
10,907
Reputation
12,669
1758211480508

Looks very brown ngl looks a bit Indian

And here’s proof he’s italian
1758211507139



This is just proof that Italians are brown and not white yet Italians are still one of the most desirable to women
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: vernier, PrinceLuenLeoncur, Tigermoggerlol and 5 others
Sorry, but he does not look South Asian, sure he has a darker complexion than say an average Northern European, but he looks European to me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shade91, Gengar, LTNUser and 4 others
Nigga he is NOT south Asian
 
Sorry, but he does not look South Asian, sure he has a darker complexion than say an average Northern European, but he looks European to me
Maybe he’s Arab passing
 
  • +1
Reactions: aladdinmaxxer and whiteegyptian
he looks south asian in that pic but that one is cherrypicked, he does look italian in most vids/pics
 
South Asian? Lmao what the hell bro.

He looks half italian half albanian/balkan or something.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and soggra
South Asian? Lmao what the hell bro.

He looks half italian half albanian/balkan or something.
Yeah my bad, I’d say he’s more so Arab passing than south Asian passing and he could also pass as a tanned southern Italian
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and mrdouchebag
Everyone's coping he literally looks like an Indian
The only difference is he has high amount of red undertones unlike indians
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and soggra
@Tigermoggerlol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
White mogger of shitskins
 
His brown skin and jet black hair tells me he’s not white and instead, brown.
The skull and good looks tells me hes white, not a ethnic subhuman
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LTNUser
The skull and good looks tells me hes white, not a ethnic subhuman
Just claim every good looking ethnic as white and every ugly ethnic as ethnic theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and Saint Casanova
He is an ethnic mogger of cumskins. That’s all that matters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and soggra
He is an ethnic mogger of cumskins. That’s all that matters.
If he is mogger of whites then why did Megan fox not feel comfortable around him when they were talking with each other one day?
 
  • +1
Reactions: soggra
If he is mogger of whites then why did Megan fox not feel comfortable around him when they were talking with each other one day?
Because once you become too good looking, you start to become intimidating to women.
 
It doesnt matter, u arent even close to the same species as the white mogger op posted u deformed somalian subhuman
I’m half med idiot. I’m baiting you pinkies. Anyways meds aren’t white regardless
 
Michele Monroe is from Apulia which is the "heel" of Italy. Southern Italians are ~40% Middle Eastern on average and they have "intermediate skin". His former partner was also Lebanese.

I bet Xangsane thinks he's "browner" than MM. 🤣🤣🤣
 
View attachment 4123991
Looks very brown ngl looks a bit Indian

And here’s proof he’s italian
View attachment 4123994


This is just proof that Italians are brown and not white yet Italians are still one of the most desirable to women
like brazilian people, they tend to be paler in the winter and tanned in the summer. hes really tanned here idk what he has been doing
 
He doesn’t look South Asian one bit. Just a tanned southern European.
Where is the line between "tanned" and "brown"? Are Lebanese (who are a substantial proportion of their ancestry with Apulians) "tanned" or are they "brown"? Are Turks from Thrace "Southern European"? Are they "tanned" or are they "brown"? They share even MORE ancestry with Apulians than the Lebanese do.
 
Where is the line between "tanned" and "brown"? Are Lebanese (who are a substantial proportion of their ancestry with Apulians) "tanned" or are they "brown"? Are Turks from Thrace "Southern European"? Are they "tanned" or are they "brown"? They share even MORE ancestry with Apulians than the Lebanese do.
They're brown. People prefer the term "swarthy." There's white-passing individuals but we shouldn't be looking at cherrypicking. Even South Asians have a substantial portion that is European-derived, but that doesn't make any of us European. We are brown because most of us are brown. There are Indians who are lighter than many Europeans themselves but like I said, we shouldn't cherrypick. We should look at the majority of a certain ethnic group and judge off of that. Using "tanned" isn't an accurate description because anyone can be tanned. One of my friends who is black was tanned himself a couple of days ago.
 
They're brown. People prefer the term "swarthy." There's white-passing individuals but we shouldn't be looking at cherrypicking. Even South Asians have a substantial portion that is European-derived, but that doesn't make any of us European. We are brown because most of us are brown. There are Indians who are lighter than many Europeans themselves but like I said, we shouldn't cherrypick. We should look at the majority of a certain ethnic group and judge off of that. Using "tanned" isn't an accurate description because anyone can be tanned. One of my friends who is black was tanned himself a couple of days ago.
This is a false equivalence fallacy. Turks, Lebanese and Southern Italians overlap significantly and the others don't. Why make such arbitrary distinctions/similarities that just DON'T exist?

South Asians aren't physically or genetically closer to Turks or Lebanese than Apulians are. The opposite is true. Calling people "tanned" based an arbitrary boundaries makes no sense especially when the FORMER has a significant proportion of its population in said arbitrary boundary.

The term "white passing" is a dumb Americanism that doesn't make sense. The genes for "white skin" in Lebanon aren't different to Germans. There's no major genetic differences between Western Eurasians that there is between Western Eurasians and South Asians. Ethnicity isn't even determined by skin colour anyway especially for diverse peoples like Turks, Southern Italians and Lebanese.

Also, Apulians have the same average skin tone as Turks.
 
This is a false equivalence fallacy. Turks, Lebanese and Southern Italians overlap significantly and the others don't. Why make such arbitrary distinctions/similarities that just DON'T exist?

South Asians aren't physically or genetically closer to Turks or Lebanese than Apulians are. The opposite is true. Calling people "tanned" based an arbitrary boundaries makes no sense especially when the FORMER has a significant proportion of its population in said arbitrary boundary.

The term "white passing" is a dumb Americanism that doesn't make sense. The genes for "white skin" in Lebanon aren't different to Germans. There's no major genetic differences between Western Eurasians that there is between Western Eurasians and South Asians. Ethnicity isn't even determined by skin colour anyway especially for diverse peoples like Turks, Southern Italians and Lebanese.

Also, Apulians have the same average skin tone as Turks.
The only reason South Asians aren't close to Europeans is because we have SAHG admixture, this is so foreign to the European genome that we are pulled away from them. But still, MENA aren't white. Even not all Europeans are considered white. Never heard of Apulians BTW.
 
The only reason South Asians aren't close to Europeans is because we have SAHG admixture, this is so foreign to the European genome that we are pulled away from them. But still, MENA aren't white. Even not all Europeans are considered white. Never heard of Apulians BTW.
You're a moron. How is a white skinned Middle Easterner with the SAME SLCA4A5 genes "distinct" from a German with said genes?

The boundaries between "Europeans" (especially Southern Europeans) and "Middle Easterners" (especially Turks and Southern Caucasians) are without precedence.

"MENA" is a dumb term since most North Africans are more genetically distant to most West Asians than they are to even most Northern Europeans LET ALONE Southern Europeans, LET ALONE Southern Italians and Greek Islanders.

Again, what about groups like Turks who are both West Asian and Southern European?

Making an arbitrary "white" or "non-white" boundary based on the artificial boundaries between West Asia and Europe and ignoring phenotypic diversity is STUPID.

Nobody said ALL or MOST West Asians are "white". What we with sense are saying is that we CANNOT classify West Asians or even Southern Europeans in stupid, inaccurate essentialist terms. There's too much phenotypic. diversity in both regions for that nonsense. Nor can we use terms to imply that West Asians with "white skin" are have a distinct variant of said feature from most Europeans when they do NOT.

West Asians and Europeans are genetically and physically closer to each other than the former is to South Asians. South Asians aren't just distinct from Europeans; they're distinct from West Asians as well.

So let me ask again, why place these arbitrary boundaries between West Asians and (Southern) Europeans that don't exist? Doing so is beyond anti-science.
 
You're a moron. How is a white skinned Middle Easterner with the SAME SLCA4A5 genes "distinct" from a German with said genes?

The boundaries between "Europeans" (especially Southern Europeans) and "Middle Easterners" (especially Turks and Southern Caucasians) are without precedence.

"MENA" is a dumb term since most North Africans are more genetically distant to most West Asians than they are to even most Northern Europeans LET ALONE Southern Europeans, LET ALONE Southern Italians and Greek Islanders.

Again, what about groups like Turks who are both West Asian and Southern European?

Making an arbitrary "white" or "non-white" boundary based on the artificial boundaries between West Asia and Europe and ignoring phenotypic diversity is STUPID.

Nobody said ALL or MOST West Asians are "white". What we with sense are saying is that we CANNOT classify West Asians or even Southern Europeans in stupid, inaccurate essentialist terms. There's too much phenotypic. diversity in both regions for that nonsense. Nor can we use terms to imply that West Asians with "white skin" are have a distinct variant of said feature from most Europeans when they do NOT.

West Asians and Europeans are genetically and physically closer to each other than the former is to South Asians. South Asians aren't just distinct from Europeans; they're distinct from West Asians as well.

So let me ask again, why place these arbitrary boundaries between West Asians and (Southern) Europeans that don't exist? Doing so is beyond anti-science.
Retard alert. Arabs don't cluster with Europeans. The only Semitic people that do are Ashkenazi Jews but that's because they have a lot of European blood to begin with. And even then, they cluster close to Southern Europeans mainly. And MENA is a perfectly normal term, it's a geographical term which encompasses many ethnic groups. Nothing controversial about it.
 

Similar threads

InanimatePragmatist
Replies
22
Views
678
EthiopianMaxxer
EthiopianMaxxer
PolisCommov
Replies
52
Views
3K
Mushroom
Mushroom
D
Discussion My confession
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
4Christ_sake
4Christ_sake
True truecel
Replies
150
Views
11K
bakpaokukus
bakpaokukus

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top