I am returned in serene indignation.

ban that jew mod
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, Healthymaxxer and Сигма Бой
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and loyolaxavvierretard
it appears soon if your pc aint shit
Over for shitcels. :blackpill::feelsrope:
383647853e4916048482a89603f96f6e
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494 and loyolaxavvierretard
We must stand up :what:
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: widehipcel and Сигма Бой
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Healthymaxxer, Underdog9494 and widehipcel
That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan
Would help, but I'm not that high in authority yet.
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard and Сигма Бой
  • JFL
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard
That is inaccurate, 1,000,000 is not massive by the definition. It is massive once it exceeds the numeral value of 1,000,000. However, We adhere to the additional 5 mentions law given by thyself, your lordness. :soy:
That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan
so she mass reported bc „too many“ people were tagged is that correct or did i read it wrong
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой
so she mass reported bc „too many“ people were tagged is that correct or did i read it wrong
Xe banned it for unproven mass-tagging.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ¿Nero

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top