I asked ChatGPT to pick a pill but jailbroken this time. (Greypill)

[NZb6Air]

From what I understand you are a Blackpiller? Then you would agree that the Blackpill proposes a genetically deterministic worldview where looks are the primary factor in regards to sexual attractiveness.

The Whitepill is dependent on the Blackpill, and operates on the same worldview. If the Blackpill is an accurate description of reality, the Whitepill, while based on the same assumptions of the Blackpill, instead of describing reality proposes, (or prescribes) individual behavior in response to these assumptions.

Ye so it doesn't propose anything, the blackpill isn't a genetically deterministic worldview (that's your fabrication), it's just that social dynamics are primarily based on looks, the way you operate around this worldview is thru looksmaxxing which proposes the idea that looks are alterable (water)

Whitepill therefore does not mean anything, since looksmaxxing would the be whitepill according to your definition, nor serves any purpose

Yes, I can't see a benefit in seriously discussing a meme and treating it like its anything other. You are actually autistic

I'm not autistic, you're just an animal (thinks only in self-gain) i.e. too low iq to understand the benefits of truth seeking, keep calling it a meme to make your retard self feel better

 

[VHD]

I'm autistic

Glad you agree

 

[NZb6Air]

Glad you agree

mirin low iq nigger can't form a logical (or even funny) sentence to save his life, you'll be the first to die when life gets harder, I hope life gets harder

 

[VHD]

im a low iq nigger

If you say so

 

[Tabula Rasa]

Ye so it doesn't propose anything, the blackpill isn't a genetically deterministic worldview (that's your fabrication), it's just that social dynamics are primarily based on looks, the way you operate around this worldview is thru looksmaxxing which proposes the idea that looks are alterable (water)

Whitepill therefore does not mean anything, since looksmaxxing would the be whitepill according to your definition, nor serves any purpose

My suggesting that the Blackpill has ties to the notion of genetic determinism isn't some novel fabrication of mine, it's a concept that has been long-discussed within Blackpill and incel communities extensively, and why wouldn't it, when looks are part of the swath of genetically pre-determined traits which dictate social and romantic success.

But let's say for your sake that we use your more simplified and to the point definition. Even the Incel Wiki notes that the idea of genetic determinism is only an extended definition of the Blackpill, and not part of the core proposal of the Blackpill (that socio-sexual dynamics are based around physical attractiveness).

You use the phrase 'the way you operate around this worldview'. If the Blackpill proposes that social dynamics are primarily based on looks, why should one looksmax? What was proposed is a description of reality -- raw information. An individual can do any number of things in response to this information. They could looksmax, like you've said, or maybe they'd opt to become a hermit or monk. Perhaps they'd decide to live a life of hedonism and wantonness, or even make plans to end their own life. Or they could just simply go about their day without a care in the world.

With your definition, you are prescribing a positive judgemental action/behavior, being that one should looksmax. Looksmaxxing does not 'propose' anything, it is a neutral action. The Whitepill likewise prescribes behavior, but expands it more broadly than just looksmaxxing.

 

[NZb6Air]

My suggesting that the Blackpill has ties to the notion of genetic determinism isn't some novel fabrication of mine, it's a concept that has been long-discussed within Blackpill and incel communities extensively, and why wouldn't it, when looks are part of the swath of genetically pre-determined traits which dictate social and romantic success.

But let's say for your sake that we use your more simplified and to the point definition. Even the Incel Wiki notes that the idea of genetic determinism is only an extended definition of the Blackpill, and not part of the core proposal of the Blackpill (that socio-sexual dynamics are based around physical attractiveness).

You use the phrase 'the way you operate around this worldview'. If the Blackpill proposes that social dynamics are primarily based on looks, why should one looksmax? What was proposed is a description of reality -- raw information. An individual can do any number of things in response to this information. They could looksmax, like you've said, or maybe they'd opt to become a hermit or monk. Perhaps they'd decide to live a life of hedonism and wantonness, or even make plans to end their own life. Or they could just simply go about their day without a care in the world.

With your definition, you are prescribing a positive judgemental action/behavior, being that one should looksmax. Looksmaxxing does not 'propose' anything, it is a neutral action. The Whitepill likewise prescribes behavior, but expands it more broadly than just looksmaxxing.

A bunch of nothing, you're still not saying what the whitepill proposes

Looksmaxing isn't to sustain a hedonistic lifestyle, it's to stop the useless suffering that comes with being ugly, which is what salvation is about : reducing suffering

 

[Tabula Rasa]

A bunch of nothing, you're still not saying what the whitepill proposes

Looksmaxing isn't to sustain a hedonistic lifestyle, it's to stop the useless suffering that comes with being ugly, which is what salvation is about : reducing suffering

It looks like you didn't understand my argument which you'd see if you read it carefully. I never said that looksmaxxing was hedonistic, you just latched onto the word and made your own assumptions without going through the paragraph.

Here's what I was trying to explain more succinctly. The Blackpill is raw information, like you've said, 'social dynamics are primarily based on looks'. However, one can react in anyway in response to this information, which can include looksmaxxing, as well as living a hedonistic lifestyle, among a myriad of other things.

Re-read and pay more attention to what I've written and come back to me when we're more or less on the on the same page.

 

[NZb6Air]

It looks like you didn't understand my argument which you'd see if you read it carefully. I never said that looksmaxxing was hedonistic, you just latched onto the word and made your own assumptions without going through the paragraph.

Here's what I was trying to explain more succinctly. The Blackpill is raw information, like you've said, 'social dynamics are primarily based on looks'. However, one can react in anyway in response to this information, which can include looksmaxxing, as well as living a hedonistic lifestyle, among a myriad of other things.

Re-read and pay more attention to what I've written and come back to me when we're more or less on the on the same page.

A bunch of nothing, how about you tell me what the whitepill proposes positively (it means proactively) instead of saying "a behaviour beyond just looksmaxxing" over and over

 

[whiteislandpill]

I agree with the robot

 

[sb23]

muh progress despite le fatalism, that's just looksmaxxing which is the blackpill,

I think the Elysium forum is cool cus it's more niche and the users are kind but the ideology just seems like a copy and paste of bp. I fail to see a dif.

 

[Tabula Rasa]

A bunch of nothing, how about you tell me what the whitepill proposes positively (it means proactively) instead of saying "a behaviour beyond just looksmaxxing" over and over

I'd prefer it if you'd not argue so disingenuously by insulting and making no attempt to understand my position, but I'll take the bait.

That you're waving away my previous responses and condensing it to 'a behaviour beyond just looksmaxxing' shows that you have a hazy idea of what I'm explaining. The Blackpill is raw information, they are observations about the world we are living in. The Whitepill agrees with the same premises of the Blackpill.

The Whitepill however, further proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

 

[Tabula Rasa]

I think the Elysium forum is cool cus it's more niche and the users are kind but the ideology just seems like a copy and paste of bp. I fail to see a dif.

Pm me and we can discuss further.

 

[NZb6Air]

I'd prefer it if you'd not argue so disingenuously by insulting and making no attempt to understand my position, but I'll take the bait.

That you're waving away my previous responses and condensing it to 'a behaviour beyond just looksmaxxing' shows that you have a hazy idea of what I'm explaining. The Blackpill is raw information, they are observations about the world we are living in. The Whitepill agrees with the same premises of the Blackpill.

The Whitepill however, further proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

Wtf are you saying, acting like a fed up educator or some shit

The point here is to define something and YOU CANT DEFINE IT, you're not EXPLAINING WHAT IT IS, "you have a hazy idea" ye no shit since you don't even know what you're trying to define

The Whitepill proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

GROUND BREAKING THEORY, SO DEEP ! !

 

[Tabula Rasa]

Wtf are you saying, acting like a fed up educator or some shit

The point here is to define something and YOU CANT DEFINE IT, you're not EXPLAINING WHAT IT IS, "you have a hazy idea" ye no shit since you don't even know what you're trying to define

The Whitepill proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

GROUND BREAKING THEORY, SO DEEP ! !

I defined it in the most simplest terms in that last sentence I wrote. But it looks like we're not really getting through to each other, so I'd rather we leave this discussion for another time. Thank you for the conversation.

 

[NZb6Air]

I defined it in the most simplest terms in that last sentence I wrote. But it looks like we're not really getting through to each other, so I'd rather we leave this discussion for another time. Thank you for the conversation.

You're confused not deep

 

[Nazi Germany]

You have no clue why I am talking about this, I don't consider @Angutoid and @Nazi Germany strangers

either way

You're too low iq to consider truth to be above anything else (implied with time), it's alien to midwits like you (judgment assessed overtime seeing your replies)

You're dumb to call a discussion a schizo meltdown cause you can't see a carnal benefit to it (again normie thinking : you'd probably better spend time eating or working )

YOU PRIMITIVE PATTERN MATCHING MACHINE NORMIEFAG SUPERIORIST RETARDED MOROCCANIGGA. I HATE Talking WITH A LOW IQ NIGGA LIKE YOU you are a pig worn out with a HUMAN costume.
You PATHETIC Oxygen Wasting Meatbag Increase**) my blood pressure.
If You can't understand single shit then Your brain isn't capable to understand/comprehend. And Stop finding NONSENSE Shitlogics

I defined it in the most simplest terms in that last sentence I wrote. But it looks like we're not really getting through to each other, so I'd rather we leave this discussion for another time. Thank you for the conversation.

Man, I hate this LOWIQFAG.

 

[NZb6Air]

YOU PRIMITIVE PATTERN MATCHING MACHINE NORMIEFAG SUPERIORIST RETARDED MOROCCANIGGA. I HATE Talking WITH A LOW IQ NIGGA LIKE YOU you are a pig worn out with a HUMAN costume.
You PATHETIC Oxygen Wasting Meatbag Increase**) my blood pressure.
If You can't understand single shit then Your brain isn't capable to understand/comprehend. And Stop finding NONSENSE Shitlogics

midwit

 

[Nazi Germany]

midwit

Sorry to say, You are so dumb. The primary 12 yo kid can understandi If I give 5 min lecture on Optimism.
Sadly, Iam not a keyboard warrior like you.

 

[NZb6Air]

Sorry to say, You are so dumb. The primary 12 yo kid can understandi If I give 5 min lecture on Optimism.
Sadly, Iam not a keyboard warrior like you.

Classic case of dunning kruger, confuses word salad with depth cause he lacks logic, then tries to emulate that depth by wordsaladmaxxing then loses his shit when confronted with simple unforgiving cold logic

The whitepill proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

I've been caging at this statement, so fucking dumb

 

[Nazi Germany]

The whitepill proposes that a person should maximise happiness for themself.

I've been caging at this statement, so fucking dumb

Sorry for the rage bhai.

Okay

The Whitepill proposes that in a world of inevitable suffering and chaos, conscious optimism and relentless self-determination are not delusions but calculated acts of existential rebellion, making resilience the ultimate defiance against despair.