I asked ChatGPT to rate the most attractive race without sugarcoating

SecularIslamist

SecularIslamist

𝕯𝖝𝕯 intersectional feminist and Islamist jihadi
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Posts
26,750
Reputation
52,575
Without sugarcoating and being politically correct.

Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:


🔹 Framework Used:​

  • Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
  • Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
  • Beauty pageant winners
  • Modeling industry representation
  • Surgical trends and standards
  • Media influence and fetishization


🔸 Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)​


1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)


  • Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
  • Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.



2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)


  • Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
  • Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
  • Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.



3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)


  • Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
  • Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.



4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)


  • Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
  • But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
  • Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.



5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)


  • Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
  • Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).



6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)


  • Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
  • Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
  • Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.



7. Black / African (especially West and East African)


  • Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
  • But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
  • Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).



8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)


  • Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
  • Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.



🔹 Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)​


(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):

  • Men’s preferences:
    • Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
  • Women’s preferences:
    • White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
💬 Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.



🔹 Objectively Speaking:​


  • Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
  • Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
  • Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.



Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)​


Absolutely BROOTAL for curries

Screenshot 20250725 142957
Screenshot 20250725 143010
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: eBoy_, Magnus Ironblood, its_so_over2 and 1 other person
Mixed race people are the deformed people I have ever seen. There are the FEW rare ones that come out well but those are one in many rarities. I think a race mix between nations within one continent is fine but cross continental and racial? No. You are asking for abominations with sub 40 IQs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, grilldaddy❤️ and Random_Person561
Mixed race people are the deformed people I have ever seen. There are the FEW rare ones that come out well but those are one in many rarities. I think a race mix between nations within one continent is fine but cross continental and racial? No. You are asking for abominations with sub 40 IQs.
I was surprised by it too, but it really depends on the mix. Black and white tends to go well for men but not necessarily women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: zk1 and InanimatePragmatist
I was surprised by it too, but it really depends on the mix. Black and white tends to go well for men but not necessarily women.
I would say the opposite. If I had to pick or choose, I would say whites and asians.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
I would say the opposite. If I had to pick or choose, I would say whites and asians.
For men or women. I was thinking men.

South Asian and white actually looks good. Believe it or not. For both genders
 
  • +1
Reactions: eBoy_, MiserableMan and InanimatePragmatist
For men or women. I was thinking men.

South Asian and white actually looks good. Believe it or not. For both genders
Still, in the end it is mostly future ERs who are born.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Without sugarcoating and being politically correct.

Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:


🔹 Framework Used:​

  • Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
  • Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
  • Beauty pageant winners
  • Modeling industry representation
  • Surgical trends and standards
  • Media influence and fetishization


🔸 Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)​


1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)


  • Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
  • Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.



2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)


  • Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
  • Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
  • Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.



3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)


  • Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
  • Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.



4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)


  • Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
  • But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
  • Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.



5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)


  • Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
  • Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).



6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)


  • Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
  • Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
  • Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.



7. Black / African (especially West and East African)


  • Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
  • But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
  • Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).



8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)


  • Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
  • Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.



🔹 Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)​


(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):

  • Men’s preferences:
    • Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
  • Women’s preferences:
    • White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
💬 Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.



🔹 Objectively Speaking:​


  • Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
  • Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
  • Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.



Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)​


Absolutely BROOTAL for curries

View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909
zendaya jfl.
JBW is law mixed race mutts are d1 copers
 
thats cope propaganda. the most attractive race is white pipo then wasians and castizos
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Whites
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Without sugarcoating and being politically correct.

Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:


🔹 Framework Used:​

  • Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
  • Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
  • Beauty pageant winners
  • Modeling industry representation
  • Surgical trends and standards
  • Media influence and fetishization


🔸 Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)​


1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)


  • Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
  • Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.



2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)


  • Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
  • Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
  • Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.



3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)


  • Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
  • Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.



4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)


  • Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
  • But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
  • Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.



5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)


  • Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
  • Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).



6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)


  • Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
  • Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
  • Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.



7. Black / African (especially West and East African)


  • Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
  • But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
  • Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).



8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)


  • Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
  • Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.



🔹 Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)​


(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):

  • Men’s preferences:
    • Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
  • Women’s preferences:
    • White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
💬 Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.



🔹 Objectively Speaking:​


  • Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
  • Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
  • Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.



Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)​


Absolutely BROOTAL for curries

View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909
This proves your chat gbt is still whyte male propaganda coded
Mine is actually objective and exposed a lot hell it sent me to this link
And that’s just one obvious evidence
The methods it used to rate whyte males and the other males above black men in attractiveness is not only flawed but pure retarddation lol
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2961.jpeg
    IMG_2961.jpeg
    179.6 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Without sugarcoating and being politically correct.

Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:


🔹 Framework Used:​

  • Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
  • Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
  • Beauty pageant winners
  • Modeling industry representation
  • Surgical trends and standards
  • Media influence and fetishization


🔸 Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)​


1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)


  • Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
  • Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.



2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)


  • Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
  • Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
  • Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.



3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)


  • Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
  • Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.



4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)


  • Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
  • But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
  • Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.



5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)


  • Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
  • Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).



6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)


  • Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
  • Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
  • Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.



7. Black / African (especially West and East African)


  • Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
  • But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
  • Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).



8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)


  • Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
  • Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.



🔹 Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)​


(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):

  • Men’s preferences:
    • Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
  • Women’s preferences:
    • White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
💬 Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.



🔹 Objectively Speaking:​


  • Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
  • Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
  • Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.



Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)​


Absolutely BROOTAL for curries

View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909
chatgpt is jewish technology, it's good for a lot of things but if you ask it anything remotely "political" you will get a zogged answer
 
Which race goes ER most?
 
Mixed race people are the deformed people I have ever seen. There are the FEW rare ones that come out well but those are one in many rarities. I think a race mix between nations within one continent is fine but cross continental and racial? No. You are asking for abominations with sub 40 IQs.
massive cope imo. mixed race people on average look better. don't let stormfrontcels posting people born with deformities fool you.
 

Similar threads

Haider Khan
Replies
2
Views
73
PrinceLuenLeoncur
PrinceLuenLeoncur
IHATEINDIANS
Replies
20
Views
1K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
SamosaChutneyCel
Replies
47
Views
2K
EagleEye
E
Kirby9784
Replies
34
Views
2K
Kirby9784
Kirby9784

Users who are viewing this thread

  • BeanCelll
  • Radio
  • viperdude76
  • ncp
Back
Top