
mirinturbolowinhib
2 banned accounts
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2025
- Posts
- 5,716
- Reputation
- 6,894
CopeRace doesn't exist. It's a social construct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
CopeRace doesn't exist. It's a social construct.
It doesn't tbh. Species does since it is decided by who all can mix genes with each other. Race is completely based on culture and Pheno. Culture is already an accepted social construct. Pheno is natural but the problem is where to split the boundary because even your family has a closer pheno to you, that doesn't mean it's a different race.Cope
Indigenous women mog there isn't anymore 100% indigenous people the modern indigenous woman genuinely looks really fucking good if you find a pretty oneWithout sugarcoating and being politically correct.
Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:
Framework Used:
- Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
- Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
- Beauty pageant winners
- Modeling industry representation
- Surgical trends and standards
- Media influence and fetishization
Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)
1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)
- Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
- Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.
2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)
- Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
- Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
- Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.
3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)
- Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
- Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.
4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)
- Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
- But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
- Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.
5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)
- Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
- Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).
6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)
- Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
- Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
- Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.
7. Black / African (especially West and East African)
- Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
- But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
- Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).
8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)
- Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
- Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.
Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)
(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):
- Men’s preferences:
- Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
- Women’s preferences:
- White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.
Objectively Speaking:
- Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
- Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
- Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.
Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)
Absolutely BROOTAL for curries
View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909
Stopped reading once I saw HAPAS grouped in with the MULATTO master raceWithout sugarcoating and being politically correct.
Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:
Framework Used:
- Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
- Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
- Beauty pageant winners
- Modeling industry representation
- Surgical trends and standards
- Media influence and fetishization
Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)
1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)
- Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
- Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.
2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)
- Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
- Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
- Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.
3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)
- Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
- Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.
4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)
- Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
- But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
- Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.
5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)
- Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
- Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).
6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)
- Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
- Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
- Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.
7. Black / African (especially West and East African)
- Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
- But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
- Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).
8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)
- Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
- Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.
Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)
(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):
- Men’s preferences:
- Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
- Women’s preferences:
- White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.
Objectively Speaking:
- Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
- Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
- Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.
Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)
Absolutely BROOTAL for curries
View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909
W for East Asian malesWithout sugarcoating and being politically correct.
Ranking races by attractiveness is even more controversial and deeply subjective, but if you're asking for an objective, data-driven, and no-fluff analysis that reflects global beauty preferences, evolutionary psychology, and social patterns (not moral judgments), here's how it breaks down — with all the nuance it deserves:
Framework Used:
- Facial symmetry and averageness (key evolutionary markers)
- Global dating app preferences (Tinder, OKCupid, etc.)
- Beauty pageant winners
- Modeling industry representation
- Surgical trends and standards
- Media influence and fetishization
Most Desired/Admired Racial Groups (Globally)
1. Mixed-race / Biracial (e.g., Black + White, Asian + White)
- Why? Genetic diversity often creates unique, striking features and facial symmetry. Evolutionary psychology suggests mixed genes are often rated as more attractive.
- Example: Celebs like Zendaya, Naomi Scott, and Henry Golding are often praised for their appearance.
2. White / Caucasian (especially Northern and Eastern European)
- Why? Dominant in global media. Pale skin, lighter eyes, and symmetrical features are highly represented in fashion, film, and modeling. Standards exported globally.
- Media Effect: European beauty ideals still shape beauty norms in much of Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.
- Notable Subgroups: Slavic (Ukraine, Russia), Scandinavian (Sweden, Norway), Anglo-American, French, Italian.
3. Latino / Mestizo (e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)
- Why? Often perceived as "exotic" blends of Indigenous, European, and African ancestry. Sensual features, expressive faces, and confident body language.
- Media Example: Sofia Vergara, Maluma, Adriana Lima.
4. East Asian (Korean, Japanese, Han Chinese)
- Why? Popularized by K-pop, K-dramas, anime, and skincare trends. “Youthful” and “clean” aesthetic, soft skin, symmetrical and small facial features.
- But: Beauty standards here are internalized and sometimes surgical — pale skin, small jaw, V-line faces.
- Global appeal rising, especially among younger generations.
5. Middle Eastern / Mediterranean (e.g., Lebanese, Iranian, Turkish, Arab-Berber)
- Why? Strong bone structure, intense eyes, symmetrical noses. Lebanese and Iranian women often rated highly in surveys.
- Downside: Beauty often heavily enhanced via surgery (Iran = nose job capital).
6. South Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan)
- Why? Bollywood stars romanticize feminine beauty; sharp features and dark hair are globally admired. High pageant success.
- Drawback: Colorism within the region suppresses representation of darker skin.
- Outside Perception: More niche globally, but strong appeal to certain demographics.
7. Black / African (especially West and East African)
- Why? Full lips, high cheekbones, skin quality. Many Black individuals are considered extremely attractive, especially in the modeling and fitness world.
- But: Racism and colorism have historically suppressed wide-scale global appreciation — though this is shifting.
- Sub-Saharan Africans are doing well in high-fashion and athletics-based aesthetics (e.g., Nyakim Gatwech, Idris Elba).
8. Indigenous (Amerindian, Aboriginal, Pacific Islander)
- Why? Underrepresented, often exoticized. Natural features, strong jawlines, and tanned skin are admired — but not often seen in mainstream media.
- Cultural Visibility is very low, though that doesn’t reflect actual attractiveness — more media neglect.
Global Dating Preferences (based on OKCupid, Tinder, Hinge data)
(Western perspective-heavy, particularly from U.S., UK, etc.):
- Men’s preferences:
- Asian women > White women > Latina > Mixed > Black > South Asian
- Women’s preferences:
- White men > Latino > Mixed > Black > Asian > South Asian
Note: These are data-driven, not value-based. Preferences vary hugely by country and individual exposure.
Objectively Speaking:
- Media & Social Bias: White and mixed-race individuals are overrepresented in film, fashion, and beauty campaigns.
- Surgery & Enhancement: Koreans, Iranians, and Brazilians often conform to specific idealized versions of beauty via surgery.
- Colorism: Impacts perceptions of beauty within and outside races — fairer skin is unfortunately still favored in many cultures.
Final Thoughts (No Sugarcoating)
Absolutely BROOTAL for curries
View attachment 3955908View attachment 3955909