I believe Africans didnt evolved a great civilization because of High Inhib Passive Cuck Lifestyle

[Deleted member 2933]

Watch this video, i think violence and wars make civilizations evolve and not peace and stability.

Take a look of how passive West africa have been for centuries! No war, no expansion, no shit...

 

[Ghostcel]

Shit thred

 

[Andromeda88]

 

[Deleted member 773]

It's because of IQ, to this day Africans have not built any real countries or cities. China comes in and builds buildings, and of course you have the European countries who did the same in the 1800s.

 

[Aesthetic]

By your logic middle eastern countries have the most evolved great civilization in existence.

 

[Deleted member 685]

It's because of IQ, to this day Africans have not built any real countries or cities. China comes in and builds buildings, and of course you have the European countries who did the same in the 1800s.

Yeah but you gotta understand the cause. Lower IQ because of easier attainable resources and less tough environment

 

[FatJattMofo]

 

[Deleted member 2933]

By your logic middle eastern countries have the most evolved great civilization in existence.

Just watch the video cunt, civilization begun at the middle east.

 

[rockndogs]

Black people are less intelligent and more agressive. Thats it bro

 

[Deleted member 2933]

It's because of IQ, to this day Africans have not built any real countries or cities. China comes in and builds buildings, and of course you have the European countries who did the same in the 1800s.

They ve been at wars since the begin of civilization.

 

[Andromeda88]

 

[pisslord]

I respect your views king

 

[Aesthetic]

Just watch the video cunt, civilization begun at the middle east.

What is that for stupid ass logic and what does it have to do withy anything??? Bcs civilization began in one place doesn't mean it has evolved to the best one in the world.

 

[Deleted member 1182]

its obviously because of their dicks, they were busy fucking each other so there was no time for them to build empires

 

[Deleted member 2933]

I respect your views king

Its just a theory, i dont give a fuk if average IQ of negros are 80 or 50 or 100. I care about me.

 

[xit]

you realize africans are constantly warring right?

they just never needed to evolve higher iq due to easy climate

keep coping though.

 

[pisslord]

Its just a theory, i dont give a fuk if average IQ of negros are 80 or 50 or 100. I care about me.

I care about you king
This what matters the most

 

[Deleted member 2933]

What is that for stupid ass logic and what does it have to do withy anything??? Bcs civilization began in one place doesn't mean it has evolved to the best one in the world.

Until 1500 or so, arabs were dominant on the middle east and almost conquered europe. But after the industrial revolution UK managed to raise europe standards while arabs were still throwing stones at each other. All that shit we have today started around 200 years ago, its not old.

you realize africans are constantly warring right?

they just never needed to evolve higher iq due to easy climate

keep coping though.

100 years of warring is not enough to evolve a civilization cunt.

 

[FatJattMofo]

retarded shit thread. africans made a civilization

 

[Deleted member 2933]

retarded shit thread. africans made a civilization

Elab

 

[Aesthetic]

Until 1500 or so, arabs were dominant on the middle east and almost conquered europe. But after the industrial revolution UK managed to raise europe standards while arabs were still throwing stones at each other. All that shit we have today started around 200 years ago, its not old.

It doesnt matter how old it is. That simple 200 years have evolved civilization to another level, never seen before.

You are not making counterarguments jfl. Like i said bcs a place has alot of war doesnt mean it is the most evolved one civilization wise. Same goes for the opposite. Your logic is flawed.

 

[Deleted member 1507]

Until 1500 or so, arabs were dominant on the middle east and almost conquered europe. But after the industrial revolution UK managed to raise europe standards while arabs were still throwing stones at each other. All that shit we have today started around 200 years ago, its not old.

Jfl, Europe was already superior 3000 years ago with Greece and then Roman Empire

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Jfl, Europe was already superior 3000 years ago with Greece and then Roman Empire

They were on par with arabs, probably a little better.

It doesnt matter how old it is. That simple 200 years have evolved civilization to another level, never seen before.

You are not making counterarguments jfl. Like i said bcs a place has alot of war doesnt mean it is the most evolved one civilization wise. Same goes for the opposite. Your logic is flawed.

If the industrial revolution happened in the middle east, they would be on top today. Its just a luck move.

 

[reptiles]

It's because of IQ, to this day Africans have not built any real countries or cities. China comes in and builds buildings, and of course you have the European countries who did the same in the 1800s.

Low iq tbh i can name 7 off the bat https://www.history.com/news/7-influential-african-empires and these are really bloody ancient the africans have built empire it's (((they))) the climate commission of the elites that are trying to destroy africa's independence it's a part of agenda 21 and agenda 2030

 

[fOreVER]

It is because africans are made to be civilized not create civilizations, you imbecile

 

[Deleted member 773]

Low iq tbh i can name 7 off the bat https://www.history.com/news/7-influential-african-empires and these are really bloody ancient the africans have built empire it's (((they))) the climate commission of the elites that are trying to destroy africa's independence it's a part of agenda 21 and agenda 2030

7 empires, almost all of them mud hutts.

Compared to european and asian history it's almost nothing. Think Roman Empire, all the Chinese Dynasties, africa has nothing even remotely close to that, infact less than 10 million people lived on the continent until the 1700's

 

[FatJattMofo]

who cares about civilisation when you look like this

 

[Aesthetic]

If the industrial revolution happened in the middle east, they would be on top today. Its just a luck move.

Water is wet.

Getting an advanced civilization is all based on the luck that you have a few people that invent new stuff that progresses the entire society.

You literally defused your own base argument.

 

[FatJattMofo]

Water is wet.

Getting an advanced civilization is all based on the luck that you have a few people that invent new stuff that progresses the entire society.

You literally defused your own base argument.

the first civs were near rivers

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Water is wet.

Getting an advanced civilization is all based on the luck that you have a few people that invent new stuff that progresses the entire society.

You literally defused your own base argument.

This is my point:

I believe Africans didnt evolved a great civilization because of High Inhib Passive Cuck Lifestyle

 

[Aesthetic]

the first civs were near rivers

Ofcouse bcs water is needed for humans to survive. Tho those first civilizations werent advanced tho. So whats your point?

 

[FatJattMofo]

Ofcouse bcs water is needed for humans to survive. Tho those first civilizations werent advanced tho. So whats your point?

they remained powerful and advanced
and became
*

 

[reptiles]

7 empires, almost all of them mud hutts.

Compared to european and asian history it's almost nothing. Think Roman Empire, all the Chinese Dynasties, africa has nothing even remotely close to that, infact less than 10 million people lived on the continent until the 1700's

Really this is a mud hut ?

really mud huts i can see 1 which was a mud hut and this mogs what the other civilizations had before did you see the pagans during the bloody early days they had even worser shit.

Also the roman empire had more blacks than 1 can imagine they had black leaders ffs.

And fuck china it's a land full of parasites they build nothing they just steal kill and conquer.


And this is not even talking about all the kings left out by history by the (((victors)))

 

[Aesthetic]

This is my point:

I believe Africans didnt evolved a great civilization because of High Inhib Passive Cuck Lifestyle

Its just that they had a climatic advantage so they never needed to advance their civilization because there was always enough stuff around to survive.

Its not because they didnt get into wars or didnt try to conquer other countries. Also i have already defused your logic in my first post ITT

 

[reptiles]

Watch this video, i think violence and wars make civilizations evolve and not peace and stability.

Take a look of how passive West africa have been for centuries! No war, no expansion, no shit...

Greece>any other time period the greeks made aristotle tbh

 

[Andromeda88]

 

[Deleted member 773]

Really this is a mud hut ? View attachment 133816 View attachment 133819 really mud huts i can see 1 which was a mud hut and this mogs what the other civilizations had before did you see the pagans during the bloody early days they had even worser shit.

Also the roman empire had more blacks than 1 can imagine they had black leaders ffs.

And fuck china it's a land full of parasites they build nothing they just steal kill and conquer.


And this is not even talking about all the kings left out by history by the (((victors)))

LMAO the first image is of Carthage, which was a distinctively European / middle eastern settlement in North Africa.

Second is of the Great Zimbabwe which people's were proven to have Asian ancestry. To this day Somalians and South Africans have evidence of asian ancestry.

And the roman empire had no black leaders. That is completely false. In fact, blacks were enslaved.

 

[Aesthetic]

they remained powerful and advanced
and became
*

They became advanced bcs they had the ability and necessity to do so. Not because of how much power the civilization had.

Most advancements made in civilizations came through just a couple of people. Not by the entire civilization.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Its just that they had a climatic advantage so they never needed to advance their civilization because there was always enough stuff around to survive.

Its not because they didnt get into wars or didnt try to conquer other countries. Also i have already defused your logic in my first post ITT

Cool.

They didnt get into wars because they never needed to leave their territory to have acess to better resources.
The enviromment made them cucks.
Hard times create great civilization.

Shall we agree?

 

[Deleted member 3142]

To this day Somalians and have evidence of asian ancestry.

Did u pull this pile of garbage from your butthole? U kids should stop engaging in topics u know nothing about.

Dont spread false information about my people.

 

[Aesthetic]

Cool.

They didnt get into wars because they never needed to leave their territory to have acess to better resources.
The enviromment made them cucks.
Hard times create great civilization.

Shall we agree?

Yeh i agree with that.

 

[Deleted member 1100]

"i think violence and wars make civilizations evolve and not peace and stability."

That's the shitties theory I've ever read

 

[Andromeda88]

 

[Deleted member 2933]

"i think violence and wars make civilizations evolve and not peace and stability."

That's the shitties theory I've ever read

Elab

 

[Deleted member 1100]

.

Africans haven't envolved mostly because of war, in a place of the size of New York city alone there are probably 948209348 different tribes that are enemies of each other

If everyone is your enemy = less trade = less savings both in money and supplies = less development of all production chains = less specialization = less supplies/products to trade = repeat

Imagine you're enemy with everyone, you'll have to produce everything, it's humanly impossible to become a specialist in everything, the reason why you can have a house is because you're friends with the guy who built it and he's willing to sell it to you, same way as the architect was friends with him, and the guy painted the house, the guy who made the roof and so on...
.

Besides that Africa is just a big shit hole of a continent, you can barely plant shit there. They don't even have the basics to envolve

 

[reptiles]

LMAO the first image is of Carthage, which was a distinctively European / middle eastern settlement in North Africa.

Second is of the Great Zimbabwe which people's were proven to have Asian ancestry. To this day Somalians and South Africans have evidence of asian ancestry.

And the roman empire had no black leaders. That is completely false. In fact, blacks were enslaved.

''LMAO the first image is of Carthage, which was a distinctively European / middle eastern settlement in North Africa.''

Why does it matter who set that shit up it should matter who runs the damn thing also just leaving this out their

Beyond a shadow of a doubt in examination so were talking phenotypes here rather than colour cause you cannot fraud bones you can fraud skin you can fraud height but bones cannot be frauded not at this time period.

Very much so appernt in black phenotype skin color is nothing here bone>everything

Like this is well documented http://en.lisapoyakama.org/carthage-was-a-black-civilization/

''Second is of the Great Zimbabwe which people's were proven to have Asian ancestry. To this day Somalians and South Africans have evidence of asian ancestry.''

Notice though these ethnicites as far as i am aware have no Asian ancestory but African even though their multi ethnic main reason is cause their is no singular black race their are phenotypes and certain phenotypes are better than others it's why i hesitate to say the black or white pheno things are not as black and white.

History of Great Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe's largest daily newspaper

www.herald.co.zw

And the roman empire had no black leaders. That is completely false. In fact, blacks were enslaved.

I swear rome had black emperors it encompassed half the middle east it encompassed africa as well.

Depending on your sources you can low ball this to 4 or high ball to 6 but their were black roman emperors this is a is a lie to say their wasn't.

How many roman emperors were black? - Answers

Depending on your source, there were either four or six black emperors of Rome. --------------- First 3 members of Severan Dynasty were part-Berber or Punic from North Africa, followed by a Berber Usurper, and the next 2 were part Syrian. None were likely black as we think of it

www.answers.com

Also leaving this out their http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_...Crests/History_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire_2.htm



You starting to see why this isn't so damn black and white

.

Africans haven't envolved mostly because of war, in a place of the size of New York city alone there are probably 948209348 different tribes that are enemies of each other

If everyone is your enemy = less trade = less savings both in money and supplies = less development of all production chains = less specialization = less supplies/products to trade = repeat

Imagine you're enemy with everyone, you'll have to produce everything, it's humanly impossible to become a specialist in everything, the reason why you can have a house is because you're friends with the guy who built it and he's willing to sell it to you, same way as the architect was friends with him, and the guy painted the house, the guy who made the roof and so on...
.

Besides that Africa is just a big shit hole of a continent, you can barely plant shit there. They don't even have the basics to envolve

Finally someone who has half the fucking brains here it's not iq but incentives that build rich nations i swear people need to study the basics

 

[Lorsss]

Watch this video, i think violence and wars make civilizations evolve and not peace and stability.

Take a look of how passive West africa have been for centuries! No war, no expansion, no shit...

actually in africa there was war and expansion, however the populations were illiterate so there was nobody who wrote about historical events and so we have no testimony of african history until western civilizations colonized africa and taught africans how to write and read

 

[Deleted member 1507]

''LMAO the first image is of Carthage, which was a distinctively European / middle eastern settlement in North Africa.''

Why does it matter who set that shit up it should matter who runs the damn thing also just leaving this out their View attachment 133845


Beyond a shadow of a doubt in examination so were talking phenotypes here rather than colour cause you cannot fraud bones you can fraud skin you can fraud height but bones cannot be frauded not at this time period.

View attachment 133850

View attachment 133858


Very much so appernt in black phenotype skin color is nothing here bone>everything

View attachment 133871

View attachment 133875


Like this is well documented http://en.lisapoyakama.org/carthage-was-a-black-civilization/


View attachment 133876

''Second is of the Great Zimbabwe which people's were proven to have Asian ancestry. To this day Somalians and South Africans have evidence of asian ancestry.''

View attachment 133879


Notice though these ethnicites as far as i am aware have no Asian ancestory but African even though their multi ethnic main reason is cause their is no singular black race their are phenotypes and certain phenotypes are better than others it's why i hesitate to say the black or white pheno things are not as black and white.

History of Great Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe's largest daily newspaper

www.herald.co.zw

And the roman empire had no black leaders. That is completely false. In fact, blacks were enslaved.

I swear rome had black emperors it encompassed half the middle east it encompassed africa as well.


View attachment 133881


Depending on your sources you can low ball this to 4 or high ball to 6 but their were black roman emperors this is a is a lie to say their wasn't.

How many roman emperors were black? - Answers

Depending on your source, there were either four or six black emperors of Rome. --------------- First 3 members of Severan Dynasty were part-Berber or Punic from North Africa, followed by a Berber Usurper, and the next 2 were part Syrian. None were likely black as we think of it

www.answers.com

Also leaving this out their http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_...Crests/History_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire_2.htm



You starting to see why this isn't so damn black and white




Finally someone who has half the fucking brains here it's not iq but incentives that build rich nations i swear people need to study the basics

You're beyond saving.

 

[reptiles]

You're beyond saving.

I backed up every single thing i said down to the nitty gritty i pointed out the high and low balls factors i showed why it wasn't so black and white and i rebutted every claim he made and this took a while cause when someone makes a fucking claim you need to fact check it

 

[Deleted member 1507]

I backed up every single thing i said down to the nitty gritty i pointed out the high and low balls factors i showed why it wasn't so black and white and i rebutted every claim he made and this took a while cause when someone makes a fucking claim you need to fact check it

None of the Roman Emperors were niggers, that's a fact.
And there hasn't been a single fucking nigger who wasn't a slave that lived on the Mediterranean coast at that time.