i bet 100% of users dont understand this statement: Can integer factorization be solved in polynomial time on a classical computer?

_MVP_

_MVP_

C making Money is easy, but Not For me
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Posts
70,616
Reputation
77,197
RL, u idiot.
 
That's useless information, waste of neuron storage
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 88079
the "you're so smart" validation ur looking for is outside, IRL
 
I'd say probably not, otherwise asymmetric cryptography would be fucked. This is the holy grail of crypto-crackers, and I cannot imagine how many man-hours of extremely intelligent people have been sunken into this problem. Whoever finds an algorithm requiring only polynomial time would instantly be forcibly recruited by the NSA or killed.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: _MVP_
I'd say probably not, otherwise asymmetric cryptography would be fucked. This is the holy grail of crypto-crackers, and I cannot imagine how many man-hours of extremely intelligent people have been sunken into this problem. Whoever finds an algorithm requiring only polynomial time would instantly be forcibly recruited by the NSA or killed.
u understand the problem?
 
u understand the problem?
The problem is, in plain terms, whether there is a method (an algorithm) that can find the prime factors of any non-prime integer (integer factorization) that is sufficiently fast (runs in polynomial time).

And figuring this out is super hard.
 

Similar threads

LeonardMariana
Replies
3
Views
54
OldRooster
OldRooster
brazilianltn
Replies
4
Views
45
brazilianltn
brazilianltn
valentine
Replies
11
Views
94
SilvioMoltisantiDan
SilvioMoltisantiDan
eology
Replies
5
Views
55
eology
eology
Jordan Barrett
Replies
28
Views
169
Jordan Barrett
Jordan Barrett

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top