i bough a $115 rating - here are the results

@alix what do you think
 
Joaquin said:
You clearly doesnt mogg pattinson nor the other guy
Click to expand...
i agree with pattinson but crawford you are wrong

i clearly have better features proportions and bonemass, just worse dimo
 
Joaquin said:
@alix what do you think
Click to expand...
He is a retarded that got scammed looks like a femboy and look at some proportions:lul::ROFLMAO:
this guy comparing to Robert Pattinson :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
schizowillascend said:
i agree with pattinson but crawford you are wrong

i clearly have better features proportions and bonemass, just worse dimo
Click to expand...
U DONT HAVE BETTER BONEMASS,PROPORTIONS U LOOK LIKE A FISH :lul: lmao kys faggot
 
alix said:
U DONT HAVE BETTER BONEMASS,PROPORTIONS U LOOK LIKE A FISH :lul: lmao kys faggot
Click to expand...
jealousy speaks louder, i mog your entire bloodline brutally
 
schizowillascend said:
i agree with pattinson but crawford you are wrong

i clearly have better features proportions and bonemass, just worse dimo
Click to expand...
Crawford mogs you too
And he has better features, idk about harmony tho. Also better coloring
1000089895
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
Joaquin said:
Crawford mogs you too
And he has better features, idk about harmony tho. Also better coloring
View attachment 4029226
Click to expand...
crawford doesn't have better features, and colouring is equal
i have higher angularity then crawford
higher harmony

he just takes dimo, features are equal
 
schizowillascend said:
jealousy speaks louder, i mog your entire bloodline brutally
Click to expand...
I have more appeal than u, i am not jeaulous of you, u are a stupid guy who thinks hes htn just because four randoms told you so, and who also got scammed 10$


@Joaquin should i tag the gang? They would laugh asf:feelskek:
 
schizowillascend said:
so the package included 63 facial measurements

a facial harmony score

dimorphism, angularity and features assesment

symmetry assesment

overall score and rarity

i'll just lay out the score i got

harmony: 91.4%
front profile harmony: 96.6% 🤣
side profile harmony: 80.8%

features score: 7.64/10
dimorphism score: 6.71/10
angularity score: 6.75/10
symmetry: 89.2%
overall score: 7.75

rarity 0.08% or 1/1278
i think the percentile is based on people aged 18-30 in first world countries iirc

lmk what you guys think, did he do a good job?








View attachment 4029005View attachment 4029004
Click to expand...
Chinese ai could do this
 
alix said:
I have more appeal than u, i am not jeaulous of you, u are a stupid guy who thinks hes htn just because four randoms told you so, and who also got scammed 10$


@Joaquin should i tag the gang? They would laugh asf:feelskek:
Click to expand...
chadlite*

'the gang' 🤣
you have more appeal then me?
want to prove that

i have about 100k tiktok followers that would disagree
 
schizowillascend said:
chadlite*

'the gang' 🤣
you have more appeal then me?
want to prove that

i have about 100k tiktok followers that would disagree
Click to expand...
nigga u got 0 bonemass and some proprtions are fucked asf i got better coloring to and dimorphism ur faggot
Whats ur tiktok and bro u are not cl stop :lul:
 
schizowillascend said:
crawford doesn't have better features, and colouring is equal
i have higher angularity then crawford
higher harmony

he just takes dimo, features are equal
Click to expand...
Hoe come features are equilibrada his Eyes are obviously better same with eyebrows and lips.He just looks better and anyone will agree with this im not lying im not telling you are bad looking either you look pretty good but not at their level for sure.
1000089893
1000089898
1000089896
 

Attachments

  • 1000089895.jpg
    1000089895.jpg
    460.5 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
alix said:
nigga u got 0 bonemass and some proprtions are fucked asf i got better coloring to and dimorphism ur faggot
Whats ur tiktok and bro u are not cl stop :lul:
Click to expand...
'some proportions' which ones?

EVIDENCE BASED CLAIMS BRO 🤣

0 bonemass? lmao

not even gonna talk to u the ragebait is insane
 
terrible haircut. you need to show your forehead would compliment the angularity.
 
Joaquin said:
Hoe come features are equilibrada his Eyes are obviously better same with eyebrows and lips.He just looks better and anyone will agree with this im not lying im not telling you are bad looking either you look pretty good but not at their level for sure.View attachment 4029233View attachment 4029235View attachment 4029232
Click to expand...
his eye area mogs, i would have to agree
but my lips are infinitely better

Lip width
Philtrum length
Philtrum ridges
Lip fullness
Lip health
Commisures
Cupids bow
Lip seal
i take all of those categories
 
schizowillascend said:
so the package included 63 facial measurements

a facial harmony score

dimorphism, angularity and features assesment

symmetry assesment

overall score and rarity

i'll just lay out the score i got

harmony: 91.4%
front profile harmony: 96.6% 🤣
side profile harmony: 80.8%

features score: 7.64/10
dimorphism score: 6.71/10
angularity score: 6.75/10
symmetry: 89.2%
overall score: 7.75

rarity 0.08% or 1/1278
i think the percentile is based on people aged 18-30 in first world countries iirc

lmk what you guys think, did he do a good job?








View attachment 4029005View attachment 4029004
Click to expand...
i agree with most of it apart from the symmetry, still solid hhtn tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
paz said:
i agree with most of it apart from the symmetry, still solid hhtn tho
Click to expand...
so you agree that its 7.75 but also think hhtn?
 
schizowillascend said:
his eye area mogs, i would have to agree
but my lips are infinitely better

Lip width
Philtrum length
Philtrum ridges
Lip fullness
Lip health
Commisures
Cupids bow
Lip seal
i take all of those categories
Click to expand...
Ur lips looks like anus KYS :lul:
 
Say HI to tiktok ur faggot 115$ for a shit ratingg:feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:
 
schizowillascend said:
his eye area mogs, i would have to agree
but my lips are infinitely better

Lip width
Philtrum length
Philtrum ridges
Lip fullness
Lip health
Commisures
Cupids bow
Lip seal
i take all of those categories
Click to expand...
Im sorry but I still think he looks better than you no offence, do you mind me doing a mog battle between you and chace to see what people think?
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
Joaquin said:
Im sorry but I still think he looks better than you no offence, do you mind me doing a mog battle between you and chace to see what people think?
Click to expand...
No there isn’t any point because he has a status halo

You can keep your opinion that is ok

But from an objective standpoint we are in a similar range , I think he might be slightly higher in his prime by like 0.2 👍
 
schizowillascend said:
No there isn’t any point because he has a status halo

You can keep your opinion that is ok

But from an objective standpoint we are in a similar range , I think he might be slightly higher in his prime by like 0.2 👍
Click to expand...
JFL
 
schizowillascend said:
so the package included 63 facial measurements

a facial harmony score

dimorphism, angularity and features assesment

symmetry assesment

overall score and rarity

i'll just lay out the score i got

harmony: 91.4%
front profile harmony: 96.6% 🤣
side profile harmony: 80.8%

features score: 7.64/10
dimorphism score: 6.71/10
angularity score: 6.75/10
symmetry: 89.2%
overall score: 7.75

rarity 0.08% or 1/1278
i think the percentile is based on people aged 18-30 in first world countries iirc

lmk what you guys think, did he do a good job?








View attachment 4029005View attachment 4029004
Click to expand...
fuck you too
 
schizowillascend said:
No there isn’t any point because he has a status halo

You can keep your opinion that is ok

But from an objective standpoint we are in a similar range , I think he might be slightly higher in his prime by like 0.2 👍
Click to expand...
So if I put Diddy and you people will choose Diddy because of "status halo"
Makes no sense also if he were unknown I would say the same
 
  • JFL
Reactions: paz
schizowillascend said:
No there isn’t any point because he has a status halo

You can keep your opinion that is ok

But from an objective standpoint we are in a similar range , I think he might be slightly higher in his prime by like 0.2 👍
Click to expand...
u look good bhai but crawford mogs u
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
paz said:
u look good bhai but crawford mogs u
Click to expand...
nah theyre in the same ballpark hes not lying i dont think he mogs but he woulnt be mogged side by side.
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend and paz
Richard Cheese said:
nah theyre in the same ballpark hes not lying i dont think he mogs but he woulnt be mogged side by side.
Click to expand...
if were talking about crawford in his prime i think he mogs him nowerdays i can understand what ur saying tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
Joaquin said:
So if I put Diddy and you people will choose Diddy because of "status halo"
Makes no sense also if he were unknown I would say the same
Click to expand...
No because diddy isn’t glazed in PSL?
 
paz said:
if were talking about crawford in his prime i think he mogs him nowerdays i can understand what ur saying tho
Click to expand...
No he obviously means his prime
I just did an analysis on Crawford and he got 7.9 so he is 0.15 higher in his prime
 
Joaquin said:
Honestly I think crawford is like 8.25 and he is a 7
Click to expand...
I mean you can visually see the difference isn’t that high

Anyway Crawfords objective score was

7.9
Mine was 7.75

Case is closed , you can’t argue with your subjective opinion over science backed highly researched data on what composes an attractive face
 
Richard Cheese said:
nah theyre in the same ballpark hes not lying i dont think he mogs but he woulnt be mogged side by side.
Click to expand...
Ye I mean he is 0.15 higher objectively
But I don’t understand how people are falling under the status halo so bad

You can see side by side it isn’t brutal
People just love to underrate

Like how is everyone trying to argue with something that is made solely to be objective
🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top