i bough a $115 rating - here are the results

I mean you can visually see the difference isn’t that high

Anyway Crawfords objective score was

7.9
Mine was 7.75

Case is closed , you can’t argue with your subjective opinion over science backed highly researched data on what composes an attractive face
There is a notable difference bro...yes I agree chace isnt an 8.25 that was and overrate he is more of an 8 you are just blind thinking that you are basically on the same level as him(on his prime) . You might have gotten that score but that score might not be accurate at all. For example lets take this good rater that is called chronic in yt.
He scores Taylor Lautner at a 7.5 and he clearly isnt worse looking than you by 0.25 points. Same with hayden christensen.
Was that the guy that rated you?if it is its then its very interesting because a lot of people would agree that you are not near chad level
1000089909
 
There is a notable difference bro...yes I agree chace isnt an 8.25 that was and overrate he is more of an 8 you are just blind thinking that you are basically on the same level as him(on his prime) . You might have gotten that score but that score might not be accurate at all. For example lets take this good rater that is called chronic in yt.
He scores Taylor Lautner at a 7.5 and he clearly isnt worse looking than you by 0.25 points. Same with hayden christensen.
Was that the guy that rated you?if it is its then its very interesting because a lot of people would agree that you are not near chad level
View attachment 4029266
chronic was the one that rated me 🤣 what are you talking about
so yes, from an objective stand point i do mog lautner and christensen

and i didn't claim to be near chad level either, but most people who would score an '8' wouldn't even get rated chad

look at sean faris , chronic rated him a 7.8 in his prime but he is unknown noone would say he is high lite
1755442525824
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
chronic was the one that rated me 🤣 what are you talking about
so yes, from an objective stand point i do mog lautner and christensen

and i didn't claim to be near chad level either, but most people who would score an '8' wouldn't even get rated chad

look at sean faris , chronic rated him a 7.8 in his prime but he is unknown noone would say he is high lite View attachment 4029275
that guy does look high chadlite unlike you
Also everyone agrees that chace looks better
1000089914


1000089916
also jfl at paying more than 100 fucking dollars honestly
 
You will age like shit. These guys you posted are 20+ and look good while you will look awful at their age
 
so the package included 63 facial measurements

a facial harmony score

dimorphism, angularity and features assesment

symmetry assesment

overall score and rarity

i'll just lay out the score i got

harmony: 91.4%
front profile harmony: 96.6% 🤣
side profile harmony: 80.8%

features score: 7.64/10
dimorphism score: 6.71/10
angularity score: 6.75/10
symmetry: 89.2%
overall score: 7.75

rarity 0.08% or 1/1278
i think the percentile is based on people aged 18-30 in first world countries iirc

lmk what you guys think, did he do a good job?








View attachment 4029005View attachment 4029004
97% seems too high. Otherwise very accurate
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
yeah i know most people on org cant rate shit but some can do it good plus 100 dollars for a facial analysis is crazy to me ngl
was htis from faceiq?
 

Similar threads

jordanbarett122
Replies
9
Views
261
jordanbarett122
jordanbarett122
jordanbarett122
Replies
17
Views
327
Itsnotover77
Itsnotover77
jordanbarett122
Replies
23
Views
550
copester2
copester2
NuclearGeo20
Replies
53
Views
1K
NuclearGeo20
NuclearGeo20
RealFunkyFlamingo
Replies
14
Views
3K
itsovERpt
itsovERpt

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top