I don’t look much better at 12. Percent bf compared to 16

tgun564636

tgun564636

Luminary
Joined
Dec 8, 2025
Posts
6,203
Reputation
7,875
Physique is better at 12 percent , but facially I look different, not necessarily better. Idk how to explain it. I’ve eaten lots of slop and I look diffferent, not worse
 
Upper eyelid exposure, dark circles, overall depleted eye area can happen that low. If you need to go below 15% then your face is probably weak. Chads and robust guys can slay at 20% easily. It’s like this used to be common knowledge but this has turned into some anorexia forum where people use leanness to cope with their lack of bone mass.
 
Upper eyelid exposure, dark circles, overall depleted eye area can happen that low. If you need to go below 15% then your face is probably weak. Chads and robust guys can slay at 20% easily. It’s like this used to be common knowledge but this has turned into some anorexia forum where people use leanness to cope with their lack of bone mass.
whats the point of leanmaxxing if ur not gonna go the full way
 
Physique is better at 12 percent , but facially I look different, not necessarily better. Idk how to explain it. I’ve eaten lots of slop and I look diffferent, not worse
mirin, but I think 12 percent is too lean to be sustainable :feelswah::ogre::soy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: tgun564636

Similar threads

tgun564636
Replies
53
Views
228
UndaDog
UndaDog
tgun564636
Replies
13
Views
92
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin
Matrix88
Replies
0
Views
41
Matrix88
Matrix88
tgun564636
Replies
19
Views
78
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin
_MVP_
Replies
12
Views
65
Nathan Fielder
Nathan Fielder

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top