I don't think Hinduism is retarded at all

[Jason Voorhees]

As a Christian I find it interesting. Hinduism has a lot of super interesting ideas stuff like neti neti feels more like a mental workout or deep introspection than anything religious. You're not being told "believe this," but more like "strip away what you're not and see what's left."

There are different sects with completely different beliefs. Some people follow Vedic rituals, others are into philosophical schools like Vedanta or Yoga and many worship local village gods or tribal deities that aren't even mentioned in mainstream scriptures. Many people worship cows, others eat them.Yes there are many Hindus that eat beef. You can even completely reject all the mainstream hindu gods/teachings and maintain a seperate identity as Nastika in Hinduism too.

Kabir and Swami Vivekanda if you want to read about edgy and controversial figures. Kabir openly roasted muslims and hindus. He rejected temple rituals, caste, and scripture-worship. Called out Brahmins, Mullahs and even yogis. Swami Vivekanda attacked caste. Introduced science and rational thought and criticism in Hinduism

But yeah once you go deeper, a lot of it does lean into metaphysical claims you kind of have to just accept like "the self is Brahman" or "the soul reincarnates based on karma." There's no way to prove that stuff, and most of the time it's like "this is true because the Upanishads or Gita say so."

So if you're looking for a reason-only, evidence-based system, it does hit a wall eventual . Still, I think parts of Hindu philosophy and ideas can be applied exploring consciousness and identity without needing to buy into everything. Hinduism has got it's gems, but you gotta sift through a lot of "just take it on faith" stuff too.

 

[lastredeemer]

c-cow is mother ???

 

[Vantablack]

Buddhism is a better and cleaner version of Hinduism

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@Surfsup @Chadeep

 

[Duke Archer]

All religions are a joke

Only humans blame imaginary beings for their problems

And then ask other imaginary beings to save them

This is because animals are more logical than humans

 

[Jason Voorhees]

c-cow is mother ???

Buddhism is a better and cleaner version of Hinduism

I dont think so. Buddhism is essentially a branch of Hinduism. Just read the Bhagavad Gita. It explores a lot of interesting ideas.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

c-cow is mother ???

There are Hindus that eat cows btw.

 

[Copercel]

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@Bryce @AuraMaxxing

 

[yandex99]

Buddhism is a better and cleaner version of Hinduism

literally believes you go extinct with only your karma left when you die.theres 0 point in following the path.it's absolutely nihilist relativism.no objective beauty or love or morals or anything in that context.

 

[Bryce]

I wouldn't necessarily say I find the religion to be retarded, but I find the people who follow it to be

As with 99% of religions

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I wouldn't necessarily say I find the religion to be retarded, but I find the people who follow it to be

As with 99% of religions

Tbh I agree. A lot of Hinduism are fake. They never read a line of the gita and get influenced by some scam artist gurus.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

All religions are a joke

Only humans blame imaginary beings for their problems

And then ask other imaginary beings to save them

This is because animals are more logical than humans

Philosophical thought and deeper thinking is what seperates Animals and Humans.

 

[ltncurry]

Good thread op

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I wouldn't necessarily say I find the religion to be retarded, but I find the people who follow it to be

As with 99% of religions

I’ll admit most followers of religions are retarded and have shit reason for it. But most Gaytheists esp the militant ones like yourself are 100% of the time absolute fucking morons themselves too high on their own false superiority complex to actually realise they are just as retarded as the people they look down upon.

The educated are people like me who study this shit for sport and genuinely follow it for philosophical reasons realising that it’s true but using a different vector

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@FaceandBBC

 

[Bryce]

like yourself

Who says I am a atheist

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I’ll admit most followers of religions are retarded and have shit reason for it. But most Gaytheists esp the militant ones like yourself are 100% of the time absolute fucking morons themselves too high on their own false superiority complex to actually realise they are just as retarded as the people they look down upon.

The educated are people like me who study this shit for sport and genuinely follow it for philosophical reasons realising that it’s true but using a different vector

You should read the Gita and some kd the vedas. Hinduism isn't retarded. It is a deeply philosophical and logical religion.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@the_machinist_786 @imontheloose

 

[imontheloose]

@the_machinist_786 @imontheloose

Overheard theology students say atheism is even allowed as part of Hinduism and that it is more so a way of life than a religious doctrine. Sounds more like culture than religion.

 

[the_machinist_786]

There are both dehati and classy variants of Hinduism.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You should read the Gita and some kd the vedas. Hinduism isn't retarded. It is a deeply philosophical and logical religion.

I’ve researched eastern faiths. They have no credible historical attestation, they are full of contradictions but that based sex book I forgot the name I have practiced on curry foids before because I found it funny .

Something contradictory cannot be true and when you ask for epistemic foundations Hindus and Buddhists admit to having none and when you point out their philosophical weak points they agree and admit it’s supposed to make no sense which to me destroys any credibility those have. Buddhists are more unified and organised with their beliefs tbh but a lot of the issues of Monism and the epistemic question of Values and ethics get called into question and there’s no credible response.

 

[Aven]

DNR, we all know you are a pajeet

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Overheard theology students say atheism is even allowed as part of Hinduism and that it is more so a way of life than a religious doctrine. Sounds more like culture than religion.

Yes I even mentioned it in op. Even atheists and agnostics are accepted in Hinduism.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Who says I am a atheist

Oh so you follow the church cult of Bryce. Even worse at least Gaytheists are consistent but those like you who create your own cult are riddled with even more pride. Good luck with that

 

[Duke Archer]

Philosophical thought and deeper thinking is what seperates Animals and Humans.

Deeper thinking doesn't mean more logical

When something doesn't make sense

Animals stop doing it or get rid of it

Meanwhile humans attempt to justify everything

 

[Bryce]

like yourself are 100% of the time absolute fucking morons

The educated are people like me

too high on their own false superiority complex to actually realise they are just as retarded as the people they look down upon.

 

[FaceandBBC]

@FaceandBBC

The art of Hindu gods are so clean. Ever since I was a kid, they always gave me this weird feeling of nostalgia.

 

[160cmcurry]

cope, all religion is retarded

 

[Abdullahm06]

i found this interesting and want to try it

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Overheard theology students say atheism is even allowed as part of Hinduism and that it is more so a way of life than a religious doctrine. Sounds more like culture than religion.

This is my issue with the RELGION, it’s too flexible it bends to literally anything and everything and that’s why it’s staying power outside of its core territories is impossible. When you bend and absorb every belief your belief becomes nothing.

This is how Manachiesm disappeared from the world stage by doing this shit. Had it not been for the Caste system all Indians would be muslim or Christian by now

 

[Bryce]

Oh so you follow the church cult of Bryce. Even worse at least Gaytheists are consistent but those like you who create your own cult are riddled with even more pride. Good luck with that

You are one of the most annoying niggers on this forum and a huge reason as to why people HATE religion, it's because of niggers like you

I don't give a FUCK about religion, I do what I want and I don't praise myself for anything, you're the one over here sucking your cock about how smart and educated you are anyways

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I’ve researched eastern faiths. They have no credible historical attestation, they are full of contradictions but that based sex book I forgot the name I have practiced on curry foids before because I found it funny .

Something contradictory cannot be true and when you ask for epistemic foundations Hindus and Buddhists admit to having none and when you point out their philosophical weak points they agree and admit it’s supposed to make no sense which to me destroys any credibility those have. Buddhists are more unified and organised with their beliefs tbh but a lot of the issues of Monism and the epistemic question of Values and ethics get called into question and there’s no credible response.

Eastern faiths like Hinduism and Buddhism prioritize experiential insight over rigid logic, which can make them seem contradictory or lacking epistemic foundations from a Western perspective. But many of their paradoxes are intentional, it may not satisfy analytic standards, their focus is more on lived wisdom and inner transformation than on offering airtight philosophical proofs.

 

[ybuyhgui]

As a Christian I find it interesting. Hinduism has a lot of super interesting ideas stuff like neti neti feels more like a mental workout or deep introspection than anything religious. You're not being told "believe this," but more like "strip away what you're not and see what's left."

There are different sects with completely different beliefs. Some people follow Vedic rituals, others are into philosophical schools like Vedanta or Yoga and many worship local village gods or tribal deities that aren't even mentioned in mainstream scriptures. Many people worship cows, others eat them.Yes there are many Hindus that eat beef. You can even completely reject all the mainstream hindu gods/teachings and maintain a seperate identity as Nastika in Hinduism too.

Kabir and Swami Vivekanda if you want to read about edgy and controversial figures. Kabir openly roasted muslims and hindus. He rejected temple rituals, caste, and scripture-worship. Called out Brahmins, Mullahs and even yogis. Swami Vivekanda attacked caste. Introduced science and rational thought and criticism in Hinduism

But yeah once you go deeper, a lot of it does lean into metaphysical claims you kind of have to just accept like "the self is Brahman" or "the soul reincarnates based on karma." There's no way to prove that stuff, and most of the time it's like "this is true because the Upanishads or Gita say so."

So if you're looking for a reason-only, evidence-based system, it does hit a wall eventual . Still, I think parts of Hindu philosophy and ideas can be applied exploring consciousness and identity without needing to buy into everything. Hinduism has got it's gems, but you gotta sift through a lot of "just take it on faith" stuff too.

Hindu's spit facts about reincarnation tbh

surely when we die infinite time passes in a blink meaning as long as life exists you'll be alive again immediately in that living organism

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

@Bryce i get your point with those quotes but I’m not even tooting my own horn in critiquing your pompous attitude when you have 0 knowledge of your own. I am confident in what I bekive because I can defend it against ANY assault.

I’m a man on a fortress . You’re a man in a hut mocking others in your predicament but in the other village. Hence my comment.

But yes we must all follow the cult of Bryce all hail Bryce

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The art of Hindu gods are so clean. Ever since I was a kid, they always gave me this weird feeling of nostalgia.
View attachment 3999482View attachment 3999483

Hinduism has both versions. One that is utterly retarded but also one that is extremely high iq

 

[aladdinmaxxer]

As a Christian I find it interesting. Hinduism has a lot of super interesting ideas stuff like neti neti feels more like a mental workout or deep introspection than anything religious. You're not being told "believe this," but more like "strip away what you're not and see what's left."

There are different sects with completely different beliefs. Some people follow Vedic rituals, others are into philosophical schools like Vedanta or Yoga and many worship local village gods or tribal deities that aren't even mentioned in mainstream scriptures. Many people worship cows, others eat them.Yes there are many Hindus that eat beef. You can even completely reject all the mainstream hindu gods/teachings and maintain a seperate identity as Nastika in Hinduism too.

Kabir and Swami Vivekanda if you want to read about edgy and controversial figures. Kabir openly roasted muslims and hindus. He rejected temple rituals, caste, and scripture-worship. Called out Brahmins, Mullahs and even yogis. Swami Vivekanda attacked caste. Introduced science and rational thought and criticism in Hinduism

But yeah once you go deeper, a lot of it does lean into metaphysical claims you kind of have to just accept like "the self is Brahman" or "the soul reincarnates based on karma." There's no way to prove that stuff, and most of the time it's like "this is true because the Upanishads or Gita say so."

So if you're looking for a reason-only, evidence-based system, it does hit a wall eventual . Still, I think parts of Hindu philosophy and ideas can be applied exploring consciousness and identity without needing to buy into everything. Hinduism has got it's gems, but you gotta sift through a lot of "just take it on faith" stuff too.

every religion becomes retarded when they experience poverty

 

[imontheloose]

This is my issue with the RELGION, it’s too flexible it bends to literally anything and everything and that’s why it’s staying power outside of its core territories is impossible. When you bend and absorb every belief your belief becomes nothing.

This is how Manachiesm disappeared from the world stage by doing this shit. Had it not been for the Caste system all Indians would be muslim or Christian by now

Well it’s basically a culture among ethnic Indian folk isn’t it. You don’t convert or get proselytised to Hinduism practically, you instead adopt a specific set of Indian cultural values. Hinduism consequently has to be awfully vague due to the diversity of the nation itself.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@diss

 

[diss]

@diss

Its cool i guess

I learned a little about it in school, i was locked in on it ngl

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Eastern faiths like Hinduism and Buddhism prioritize experiential insight over rigid logic, which can make them seem contradictory or lacking epistemic foundations from a Western perspective. But many of their paradoxes are intentional, it may not satisfy analytic standards, their focus is more on lived wisdom and inner transformation than on offering airtight philosophical proofs.

That’s the point if it’s a paradox then it literally can’t be true, if it’s illogical then guess what it doesn’t pose any epistemic value in any way intentional or not.

If it’s experimental then it need not be taken seriously. Even their “transformation” is for what? There’s no greater purpouse esp in Buddhism as they are atheists basically so what even is our purpouse? To achieve enlightenment but what even truly is that? And to do that one must remove all desires which is hilarious once you realise achieving enlightenment is an DESIRE . They can’t even say why things are the way they are what caused those things to act in this way why the world is this way. At least Hindus have a God to explain this shit but Buddhists .

Both are riddled with this nonsense and are ultra messy esp Hinduism by far the messiest RELGION on earth with basically no dogmatic core of beliefs that kicks people out of the faith for heresy.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Well it’s basically a culture among ethnic Indian folk isn’t it. You don’t convert or get proselytised to Hinduism practically, you instead adopt a specific set of Indian cultural values. Hinduism consequently has to be awfully vague due to the diversity of the nation itself.

Ultimately it’s about the “truth” and a contradiction cannot be true by default which thus excludes both Buddhism and Hinduism. And idc about that niggercel who converted to Buddhism here crying I blocked him because he runs his mouth then when I respond he goes quiet every time.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

That’s the point if it’s a paradox then it literally can’t be true, if it’s illogical then guess what it doesn’t pose any epistemic value in any way intentional or not.

If it’s experimental then it need not be taken seriously. Even their “transformation” is for what? There’s no greater purpouse esp in Buddhism as they are atheists basically so what even is our purpouse? To achieve enlightenment but what even truly is that? And to do that one must remove all desires which is hilarious once you realise achieving enlightenment is an DESIRE . They can’t even say why things are the way they are what caused those things to act in this way why the world is this way. At least Hindus have a God to explain this shit but Buddhists .

Both are riddled with this nonsense and are ultra messy esp Hinduism by far the messiest RELGION on earth with basically no dogmatic core of beliefs that kicks people out of the faith for heresy.

You're applying rigid logic to systems that were never trying to be logical in the first place it’s like criticizing poetry for not being a math equation. Eastern traditions aren't aiming to construct objective truth claims in the Western sense they operate more like frameworks for introspection, not scientific models. Buddhism doesn’t try to answer "why the world exists" because it considers that question irrelevant to the problem of suffering, which is its central concern. You’re right that the desire to end desire seems contradictory but Buddhism acknowledges this and resolves it pragmatically, not theoretically (like using a thorn to remove another).

As for Hinduism, its pluralism isn’t a weakness it reflects a civilizational philosophy that tolerates ambiguity and evolving interpretations rather than enforcing creeds. It’s messy, yes, but it’s also one of the few ancient traditions that never needed to purge heretics to survive. That might not make it epistemically satisfying, but it does make it enduring.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Well it’s basically a culture among ethnic Indian folk isn’t it. You don’t convert or get proselytised to Hinduism practically, you instead adopt a specific set of Indian cultural values. Hinduism consequently has to be awfully vague due to the diversity of the nation itself.

Read the second paragraph

You're applying rigid logic to systems that were never trying to be logical in the first place it’s like criticizing poetry for not being a math equation. Eastern traditions aren't aiming to construct objective truth claims in the Western sense they operate more like frameworks for introspection, not scientific models. Buddhism doesn’t try to answer "why the world exists" because it considers that question irrelevant to the problem of suffering, which is its central concern. You’re right that the desire to end desire seems contradictory but Buddhism acknowledges this and resolves it pragmatically, not theoretically (like using a thorn to remove another).

As for Hinduism, its pluralism isn’t a weakness it reflects a civilizational philosophy that tolerates ambiguity and evolving interpretations rather than enforcing creeds. It’s messy, yes, but it’s also one of the few ancient traditions that never needed to purge heretics to survive. That might not make it epistemically satisfying, but it does make it enduring.

 

[Bryce]

@Bryce i get your point with those quotes but I’m not even tooting my own horn in critiquing your pompous attitude when you have 0 knowledge of your own. I am confident in what I bekive because I can defend it against ANY assault.

I’m a man on a fortress . You’re a man in a hut mocking others in your predicament but in the other village. Hence my comment.

But yes we must all follow the cult of Bryce all hail Bryce

You are a legend in your own mind.

Seriously, you're one of the only people on this forum who has a moral superiority complex, everyone else is normal. I honestly do commend you for being this confident in your own retardation

You don't have to keep going around trying to prove to other men how smart and right you are on everything, did your father ever validate you at a young age? Probably not, sorry about that, us WASPs (or cumskins as you like to repeatedly call us) don't have to worry about having a functional nuclear family

Also, you nonstop violate the 1st commandment

 

[imontheloose]

That’s the point if it’s a paradox then it literally can’t be true, if it’s illogical then guess what it doesn’t pose any epistemic value in any way intentional or not.

If it’s experimental then it need not be taken seriously. Even their “transformation” is for what? There’s no greater purpouse esp in Buddhism as they are atheists basically so what even is our purpouse? To achieve enlightenment but what even truly is that? And to do that one must remove all desires which is hilarious once you realise achieving enlightenment is an DESIRE . They can’t even say why things are the way they are what caused those things to act in this way why the world is this way. At least Hindus have a God to explain this shit but Buddhists .

Both are riddled with this nonsense and are ultra messy esp Hinduism by far the messiest RELGION on earth with basically no dogmatic core of beliefs that kicks people out of the faith for heresy.

Hard to prove a religion is illogical when it is vague and bendable; you instead have to invoke an experimental or useless clause, as you did, since you’re now effectively trying to prove that it cannot have truth value (whether that is something they believe in or not, I am unaware of) due to its utility.

Islam is not like that at all and is rather a very rigid doctrine that cannot be changed. Muslims slaughter each other simply because of their minute differences of ideal Caliph. Hinduism doesn’t have these problems to reconcile and the cases of such will likely be family, economically, or tribally motivated.

These sort of religions are very different to the Semitic ones, indeed.

 

[imontheloose]

Read the second paragraph

Didn’t see this. I would’ve erased half my above post if so.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You're applying rigid logic to systems that were never trying to be logical in the first place it’s like criticizing poetry for not being a math equation. Eastern traditions aren't aiming to construct objective truth claims in the Western sense they operate more like frameworks for introspection, not scientific models. Buddhism doesn’t try to answer "why the world exists" because it considers that question irrelevant to the problem of suffering, which is its central concern. You’re right that the desire to end desire seems contradictory but Buddhism acknowledges this and resolves it pragmatically, not theoretically (like using a thorn to remove another).

As for Hinduism, its pluralism isn’t a weakness it reflects a civilizational philosophy that tolerates ambiguity and evolving interpretations rather than enforcing creeds. It’s messy, yes, but it’s also one of the few ancient traditions that never needed to purge heretics to survive. That might not make it epistemically satisfying, but it does make it enduring.

Then once again why take it seriously? Even their philosophical system literally makes no coherent sense I can’t use that to explain reality and why things are the way they are it’s make belief from demons which trolled the pajeets in Curryland. I mean even Islam a religion I despise at least makes some sense and only at deeper inspection do the cracks start to form.

Eastern faiths by its nature on its surface raise too many questions it doesn’t have the answer 2 and when you ask like you said your told to “deal with it” well nah I’ll let you be in your delusion of Hinduism.

As god said in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-11

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Hard to prove a religion is illogical when it is vague and bendable; you instead have to invoke an experimental or useless clause, as you did, since you’re now effectively trying to prove that it cannot have truth value (whether that is something they believe in or not, I am unaware of) due to its utility.

Islam is not like that at all and is rather a very rigid doctrine that cannot be changed. Muslims slaughter each other simply because of their minute differences of ideal Caliph. Hinduism doesn’t have these problems to reconcile and the cases of such will likely be family, economically, or tribally motivated.

These sort of religions are very different to the Semitic ones, indeed.

Semitic religions like Islam are built on divine revelation and rigid orthodox so deviation is heresy. That's why they're internally volatile but externally unified disagreement is existential. Hinduism on the other hand, functions more like a meta religion or civilization wide philosophy than a doctrinal system.

 

[imontheloose]

Semitic religions like Islam are built on divine revelation and rigid orthodox so deviation is heresy. That's why they're internally volatile but externally unified disagreement is existential. Hinduism on the other hand, functions more like a meta religion or civilization wide philosophy than a doctrinal system.

That’s my point.