I don’t understand how to perceive this study

[.*my*.]

At 3–4 months of age, infants respond to gender information in human faces. Specifically, young infants display a visual preference toward female over male faces. In three experiments, using a visual preference task, we investigated the role of hairline information in this bias. In Experiment 1, we presented male and female composite faces with similar hairstyles to 4-month-olds and observed a preference for female faces. In Experiment 2, the faces were presented, but in this instance, without hairline cues, and the preference was eliminated. In Experiment 3, using the same cropping to eliminate hairline cues, but with feminized female faces and masculinized male faces, infants’ preference toward female faces was still not in evidence. The findings show that hairline information is important in young infants’ preferential orientation toward female faces.

 

[.*my*.]

This is just weird tbh

 

[BigBiceps]

Who tf reads and searches shit like this? You have too much free time

 

[MansNotHot]

4 month infants can't see shit so the only clue they can analyze in a face is the hairline.
That's what i got from it

 

[Deleted member 5698]

4 month infants can't see shit so the only clue they can analyze in a face is the hairline.
That's what i got from it

 

[.*my*.]

4 month infants can't see shit so the only clue they can analyze in a face is the hairline.
That's what i got from it

No 4 months have almost clear vision. It’s strange because there are other dimorphism signs. Why hairline?

 

[.*my*.]

Who tf reads and searches shit like this? You have too much free time

I didn’t search it intentionally.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

This is just weird tbh

XD

 

[Deleted member 6403]

 

[Deleted member 6403]

[QUOTE="kjsbdfiusdf, post: 4913582, member: 6403"