I don't understand "objective" ratings

[hopecel271]

I usually get rated at around top 20% facially (only front) or MTN or sum shit, but today someone rated me at around 50% facially on a real basis, it`s only a picture that go rated, and i know its a dumb question, but how objective are looks really?

 

[volgaTz]

harmony is objective

but ur harmony score is only a part of ur actual attractiveness

 

[bigboss7732]

grey

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

Attractiveness not even close to objective. Harmony as mentioned before is but a lot more goes into SMV than just that.

Of course it's less subjective than "nah bro don't worry, someone will find you attractive!" in regards to a subhuman but there is a lot of variation in archetype preference, physique preference, height preference (but the 'preference' typically only appears when they are already among the top tier)

 

[enlightful]

I usually get rated at around top 20% facially (only front) or MTN or sum shit, but today someone rated me at around 50% facially on a real basis, it`s only a picture that go rated, and i know its a dumb question, but how objective are looks really?

They are objective but not everyone can rate faces accurately since objective facial attractive criterias are very nuanced